Happy Gilmore vs Denton Van Zan

Originally posted by the ninjak
Robocop vs Terminator.
Alien vs Predator.
Freddy vs Jason.

Proof that the idea of two different franchises can coexist simply because someone wrote it.

Are you denying Bob Barker existed before the Dragons attacked?

Originally posted by Robtard
Common sense when two films are very opposing to each other, these two aren't; there's no reason to believe that Happy Gilmore didn't exist in America at the same time Quinn existed(as a very young child) in England in the same Earth/Universe. So since your point of view is going against logic and reason, it's on you to prove it.

So prove it, or STFU.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You have to prove your claim we don't automatically assume they are from the same universe until proven so. Common sense.

Other way around, logic tells us it's the same exact Earth just in different points of time, you need to prove it isn't as you claimed first.

I know you can't; you know you can't. Concession accepted.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You kinda prpved my point for me. You can make another universe canon to your own like in these instances but without doing so the events of each movies are in their own.

Well yeah. Cept the fact that Bob Barker definitely existed before Reign of Fire. And he has feats of kicking ass cooler than Van Zan.

Originally posted by the ninjak
Well yeah. Cept the fact that Bob Barker definitely existed before Reign of Fire. And he has feats of kicking ass cooler than Van Zan.

Originally posted by Robtard
Other way around, logic tells us it's the same exact Earth just in different points of time, you need to prove it isn't as you claimed first.

I know you can't; you know you can't. Concession accepted.

Happy Gilmore killed a gator with his bare hands.

That is in fact a better feat than beating up a random dude and jumping off a building and getting eaten.

Originally posted by quanchi112

So you believe every movie unless proven otherwise exists in the same universe. Honestly, roberto.

Don't try and twist what I said into what you need.

That's the 5th time now you've dodged supporting the silly claim you made, Quancheese.

So prove it, or STFU.

Originally posted by Robtard
Don't try and twist what I said into what you need.

That's the 5th time now you've dodged supporting the silly claim you made, Quancheese.

So prove it, or STFU.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You made the claim.

LoL, you clownshoe. You posted in here BEFORE I did and in that post you claimed that Van Zan and Happy Gilmore were from different universes.

It's now the 6th time you've dodged supporting it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So by your logic any futuristic movie means Happy Gilmore took place in it. Unless they make it so each universe is different.

No. Only if it existed after 1996.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Happy Gilmore killed a gator with his bare hands.

That is in fact a better feat than beating up a random dude and jumping off a building and getting eaten.

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, you clownshoe. You posted in here BEFORE I did and in that post you claimed that Van Zan and Happy Gilmore were from different universes.

It's now the 6th time you've dodged supporting it.

Originally posted by the ninjak
No. Only if it existed after 1996.

And Bob Barker beat the crap out of him. He wins this.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Because that's what we assume unless otherwise proven. Then you need to prove it. The rules don't state everything exists in the same universe unless you can prove it the common accepted belief is that each verse is different unless otherwise proven in each universe like in Freddy Vs. Jason.

Happy Gilmore 1996. Reign of Fire 2002. The actual film is based 20 years after 2002, 2022.

Bob Barker beats the crap out of a guy who beat an alligator into unconsciousness if not death. Bob Baker beats the crap out of a guy who beat up an idealistic Christian Bale and who jumped into a dragon's mouth.

I would like to see Van Zan fight an Alligator.

Originally posted by the ninjak
Happy Gilmore 1996. Reign of Fire 2002. The actual film is based 20 years after 2002, 2022.

Bob Barker beats the crap out of a guy who beat an alligator into unconsciousness if not death. Bob Baker beats the crap out of a guy who beat up an idealistic Christian Bale and who jumped into a dragon's mouth.

I would like to see Van Zan fight an Alligator.

Zan bests a guy who got destroyed by an old host from the Price's Right.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Zan bests a guy who got destroyed by an old host from the Price's Right.

That Price is Right host beat the crap out of a guy who performed a feat Van Zan would have a problem doing. Being beating an alligator into unconsciousness.

Originally posted by the ninjak
Robocop vs Terminator.
Alien vs Predator.
Freddy vs Jason.

Proof that the idea of two different franchises can coexist simply because someone wrote it.

Are you denying Bob Barker existed before the Dragons attacked?

Originally posted by Robtard
Common sense when two films are very opposing to each other, these two aren't; there's no reason to believe that Happy Gilmore didn't exist in America at the same time Quinn existed(as a very young child) in England in the same Earth/Universe. So since your point of view is going against logic and reason, it's on you to prove it.

So prove it, or STFU.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am saying the events from happy gilmore aren't anon to reign of fire. If Bob Barker exists it's the realistic person not the movie role from Gilmore.

Bob Barker has film feats. He beat the crap out a guy who killed an alligator pro wrestling style.

Barker jabs Van Zan into wooziness then takes him down. Van Zan doesn't know what hits him.

I just watched Reign of Fire a little bit. You could have told me that he was part of a U.S Special Forces regiment before his unit got attacked. That would have made a much better better argument than "He died better than McClane ever lived!!!!!"

Originally posted by Lestov16
I just watched Reign of Fire a little bit. You could have told me that he was part of a U.S Special Forces regiment before his unit got attacked. That would have made a much better better argument than "He died better than McClane ever lived!!!!!"

How old is the guy??? considering the film is based 20 years after the dragons decimate the Earth.

When he introduced himself he said he was from a regiment from Kentucky

Originally posted by quanchi112
Because that's what we assume unless otherwise proven.

So you agree that your silly claim was based off an assumption and has nothing to support it. Good, moving on.

Happy Gilmore beats the living crap out of Van Zan, he actually has fighting feats of worth, unlike Zan Van's nigh nothing. Happy Gilmore is the guy you should have pitted against McClane, that's a proper fight. Hopefully you learned something from this.

Perhaps I exaggerated on the Special Ops part, but still I'm pretty sure military regiment sent from the States has to have some pretty good credentials