Happy Gilmore vs Denton Van Zan

Started by Robtard4 pages
Originally posted by Lestov16
Perhaps I exaggerated on the Special Ops part, but still I'm pretty sure military regiment sent from the States has to have some pretty good credentials

Considering how poorly he fought Quinn with the schoolyard moves, he doesn't have any sort of special training.

Originally posted by Lestov16
When he introduced himself he said he was from a regiment from Kentucky

Meaning even though he may be from a special forces regiment in the Kentucky Army. They exist in a primitive medieval state and don't have access to the kind of expertise a modern day special forces training program would have to offer.

Originally posted by the ninjak
Bob Barker has film feats. He beat the crap out a guy who killed an alligator pro wrestling style.

Barker jabs Van Zan into wooziness then takes him down. Van Zan doesn't know what hits him.

Glad you gave up on the argument that Happy Gilmore's fictional events are canon to Reign of Fire.

Vam Zan doesn't even feel his punches. He headbutts Bob Barker out. Barker was down against Happy and he let off him. Zan won't give him a moment's reprieve.

Originally posted by Robtard
So you agree that your silly claim was based off an assumption and has nothing to support it. Good, moving on.

Happy Gilmore beats the living crap out of Van Zan, he actually has fighting feats of worth, unlike Zan Van's nigh nothing. Happy Gilmore is the guy you should have pitted against McClane, that's a proper fight. Hopefully you learned something from this.

We don't assume a modern day earth takes into consideration another comedic movie's events as canon. It's laughable.

Getting beat up by someone in their 80's is pitiful. Zan sonns him.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We don't assume a modern day earth takes into consideration another comedic movie's events as canon. It's laughable.

Getting beat up by someone in their 80's is pitiful. Zan sonns him.

You just said you're the one assuming things, which you are. I know. Stop crying about it, you made a claim; couldn't support it. We've moved on.

Sure, keep ignoring (Happy's) high end feats. It's all you can do as shown over and over, thread after thread.

Originally posted by Robtard
You just said you're the one assuming things, which you are. I know. Stop crying about it, you made a claim; couldn't support it. We've moved on.

Sure, keep ignoring (Happy's) high end feats. It's all you can do as shown over and over, thread after thread.

Common sense is just within my being unlike yourself.

Happy got beat up by an older man. That's pretty low end, dude.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Common sense is just within my being unlike yourself.

Happy got beat up by an older man. That's pretty low end, dude.

You just said you based your claim on an assumption, which you couldn't back-up. Stop lying.

That old man would do the same to Van Zan, considering Happy beat-up an alligator and a shitload of other guys. So keep ignoring.

Originally posted by Robtard
You just said you based your claim on an assumption, which you couldn't back-up. Stop lying.

That old man would do the same to Van Zan, considering Happy beat-up an alligator and a shitload of other guys. So keep ignoring.

Reign of Fire takes into consideration modern day earth not another fictional comedic movie's actions as canon. Get real.

Nah, Gilmore let up where it's within Zan's character to not stop until the man is dead.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Reign of Fire takes into consideration modern day earth not another fictional comedic movie's actions as canon. Get real.

Nah, Gilmore let up where it's within Zan's character to not stop until the man is dead.

10th time asking: Prove it, or STFU.

Funny, Quinn was fine and alive after their schoolyard-like fight. You need to pay better attention.

Originally posted by Robtard
10th time asking: Prove it, or STFU.

Funny, Quinn was fine and alive after their schoolyard-like fight. You need to pay better attention.

You can either prove it or not. You made the claim from the same verse.

Because someone pulled him off this is a one on one thread fight. Wow.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You can either prove it or not. You made the claim from the same verse.

Because someone pulled him off this is a one on one thread fight. Wow.

Another dodge. I'd ask an 11th time, but you'd just dodge and do some more monkey-flips.

LoL, more assuming and speculation.

Zan beat up some random dude.

Gilmore physically killed a gator with his bare hands.

Now Quan, I know even reading my post is incredibly mentally taxing for you, but try to see reason by admitting I am right and a much better person than you.

Originally posted by Robtard
Another dodge. I'd ask an 11th time, but you'd just dodge and do some more monkey-flips.

LoL, more assuming and speculation.

We don't ever assume another universe's actions are canon unless it is stated.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Zan beat up some random dude.

Gilmore physically killed a gator with his bare hands.

Now Quan, I know even reading my post is incredibly mentally taxing for you, but try to see reason by admitting I am right and a much better person than you.

Gilmore beat up a gator. Zan killed a dragon.

Zan crushed a man in peak physical condition whereas Gilmore lost to someone in their twilight years.

Now Nemebro I know you're kinda of a sad guy begging for those to recognize it's your birthday and all but losing to a man in his golden years is kinda pathetic.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Gilmore beat up a gator. Zan killed a dragon.

Not physically. Just because a skinny twerp could kill Brock Lesnar, for example, with an assault rifle doesn't mean that said twerp could beat Brock in a fistfight.

Zan crushed a man in peak physical condition whereas Gilmore lost to someone in their twilight years.

Joe Greenstein at the age of 80 could burst multiple steel chains by expanding his chest, change a tire without any tools, bend coins with his thumb and forefinger, and chew nuts and bolts into powder.

Bob Barker being old means absolutely nothing, and attacking his age shows your incompetency. You have no argument, and you know this.

Now Nemebro I know you're kinda of a sad guy begging for those to recognize it's your birthday and all but losing to a man in his golden years is kinda pathetic.

It is not wrong for God to expect worship. Be thankful I did not smite your souls for not recognising the day I assumed this corporeal form.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Not physically. Just because a skinny twerp could kill Brock Lesnar, for example, with an assault rifle doesn't mean that said twerp could beat Brock in a fistfight.

Joe Greenstein at the age of 80 could burst multiple steel chains by expanding his chest, change a tire without any tools, bend coins with his thumb and forefinger, and chew nuts and bolts into powder.

Bob Barker being old means absolutely nothing, and attacking his age shows your incompetency. You have no argument, and you know this.

It is not wrong for God to expect worship. Be thankful I did not smite your souls for not recognising the day I assumed this corporeal form.

Wrong. A dragon's speed, power, size, and vision is far greater than a gator's.

If you are using one man as an example whereas he's a freak you already lost. There are much stronger peak males than the best older peak male. Test levels drastically start going down in your thirties and on. Anyone saying someone in their 80's is better than someone in their thirties isn't being realistic.

Just admit Van wins. For the kids.

Beating an Aligator with your bare hands is more impressive than shooting dragons with guns and harpoons.

Quan, you are really overestimating that fight. You need to take a look at the aftermath of it

Gilmore wins. Then Bob's got dibs.

Originally posted by the ninjak
Beating an Aligator with your bare hands is more impressive than shooting dragons with guns and harpoons.
Not when you see him beaten down by a 70 year old man. You have to look at his whole body of work not just focus on his gator win.
Originally posted by Lestov16
Quan, you are really overestimating that fight. You need to take a look at the aftermath of it
No, I am really not.

Quan, I'm not trying to be mean, but I think you are. Watch the aftermath. As they pull Zan off of Quinn, Quinn is as vigorous as ever. He needed people to hold him back

Originally posted by Lestov16
Quan, I'm not trying to be mean, but I think you are. Watch the aftermath. As they pull Zan off of Quinn, Quinn is as vigorous as ever. He needed people to hold him back
The point is Zan would have killed him had they continued and despite him not being critically injured he still would have finished him and was clearly in control up until they broke it up.