Ron Paul exposes the neocons.

Started by Omega Vision14 pages

Edit: I'm just going to leave since this is going nowhere productive.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Edit: I'm just going to leave since this is going nowhere productive.
Couldn't agree more. It usually gets derailed with comments such as this.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
I'm now starting to suspect that Mairuzu is paid by the Romney campaign to post here.

stoned

I guarantee you the corporate controlled media is covering this up about their CFR poster boy Romney getting little support here in detroit like Paul is.lol.hee hee.

http://www.politicalforum.com/elections-campaigns/235136-ron-paul-gets-crowd-mitt-gets-empty-stadium-michigan.html

this is such a great thread.needs to be brought back.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
this is such a great thread.needs to be brought back.

Ron who? 😉

What's a Paul? You're a Paul!

I haven't heard anything about him in over a month.

For that matter, I've heard more about the French election than the American campaign trail in the last few weeks.

I guess nothing's happening.

Really? You must not have very good sources of info. I hear about Paul daily, if that's who you're referring to.

Turns out he wins Iowa all along. As well as minnesota.

Possibly going for the Warren G Harding 1920 win. Had a pretty good couple of weeks.

More bullshit going on in Alaksa this time around from Romney supporters who are in charge of delegate process. With everyone claiming Romney won the nominee already, they sure are trying their hardest to prevent Paul from obtaining delegates.

We'll see how it all pans out stoned

Originally posted by Mairuzu
Turns out he wins Iowa all along. As well as minnesota.

I guess if you consider third and second as "wins" or is this another claim of fraud?

edit: I see it looks like he took a bunch of delegates despite not getting votes from the people. Weird.

Ron Paul will most likely drop out if he doesn't do well today.

Wow, what a ridiculous election system.

So in Iowa the committee who decides the winner is no way bound to follow the popular vote. It happened to be stuffed with Paul supporters who just gave him the majority.

Candidate of the people, clearly.

So far a guaranteed half and it can only get better from there. Clear win in Iowa. He's been saying he's going to be win these states the whole time, and now its all unfolding. Paul won't drop out till the end and he will make a showing at the convention.

Philly had a good turnout even with rain. 4,000+

We'll see how that gets turned into votes though, and especially delegates.

YouTube video

Originally posted by Mairuzu
Really? You must not have very good sources of info. I hear about Paul daily, if that's who you're referring to.


BBC.

I guess they only cover American people who matter.

Lol i love your little baits you little master baiter.

You only have one source though? Dangerous. Makes sense though.

Originally posted by Mairuzu
Lol i love your little baits you little master baiter.

You only have one source though? Dangerous. Makes sense though.


That wasn't a bait. A bait would imply I actually care to engage you further in discussion. Think of it more as a comment.

And BBC tends to be a lot more level headed about American politics than CNN, Fox, or whatever Ron Paul-centered internet news feed you follow.

I tend to avoid that main stream bull shit they call news. The only decent anchor on FOX right now is Ben Swann, reality check.

BBC? Even I see brits on other forums expressing their views on Ron Paul, even on recent news. They're obviously getting their info from other sources other than just BBC 😛

Originally posted by Mairuzu
I tend to avoid that main stream bull shit they call news. The only decent anchor on FOX right now is Ben Swann, reality check.

BBC? Even I see brits on other forums expressing their views on Ron Paul, even on recent news. They're obviously getting their info from other sources other than just BBC 😛


BBC has talked about Ron Paul, just not in the last month.

Just like Santorum or Gingrich haven't appeared in any of their articles in over a week, except in brief mentions.

At this point there's little reason to talk about anyone other than Romney unless you're talking about who will be Romney's VP.

Makes sense seeing how Gingrich is having some debt issues and is going to drop out if he doesn't do well in Delaware. Santorum dropped out, what is there to talk about?

Lol, so you think it matters what is being said about Romney even if he wins the GOP nomination? You do realize that he will never win against Obama? I don't think he was ever meant to. Either way, Goldman Sachs wins.

Originally posted by Mairuzu
Makes sense seeing how Gingrich is having some debt issues and is going to drop out if he doesn't do well in Delaware. Santorum dropped out, what is there to talk about?

Lol, so you think it matters what is being said about Romney even if he wins the GOP nomination? You do realize that he will never win against Obama? I don't think he was ever meant to. Either way, Goldman Sachs wins.


What's with the "even if"? Barring an act of God, Romney will take the GOP nomination.

I didn't say he'd win against Obama. But he is more relevant and newsworthy than your man Paul.