And since I know how much you love trees:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v282/Ironboy/The%20Thing/FantasticFour112-06.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v282/Ironboy/The%20Thing/FantasticFour112-07.jpg
And since I know how much you love trees:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v282/Ironboy/The%20Thing/FantasticFour112-06.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v282/Ironboy/The%20Thing/FantasticFour112-07.jpg
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
It's fiction, most characters picking up large structures shouldn't work but it does. Part of the suspension of disbelief.That's my bad, I clicked on the first link on google. I'm not often lazy when in a discussion, won't happen again.How do you figure? According to the handbooks, 95 tons is above his limit. Here he effortlessly lifts and tosses a 95 ton object.
And here he easily swings around Cleopatra's needle (Nearly 200 tons as far as I can tell):
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v282/Ironboy/The%20Thing/FantasticFour112-08.jpgRips out a tower and sends an object over the horizon:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v282/Ironboy/The%20Thing/fantasticfour16-21.jpgThe narration clearly states that the device was exerting enough force to shatter a mountain. It wasn't a level it was going to reach, it was a level it had reached. Not really sure what you find confusing there.
It's part durability but strength was clearly intended to play a large part in it.
Not really.
Context? Tanaraq version? Walter was no stronger here than at any other point in his history.
I get it, you only dismiss the ones you don't like.
Did you just tell me to learn a little about Marvel? Haha. Can we please move this discussion over to the comic vs. section? I don't want any off topic nonsense getting in the way.
Yes, I realize that Walter has been able to grow stronger over the years as he loses more control but Walter was no stronger there than at any other point in his history. Yes he is.
Drax fights Thanos and destroys a planet:
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t173/EndlessMike9/drax/draxthanosplanetbust.jpg
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t173/EndlessMike9/drax/draxthanosplanetbust1.jpgDestroys another planet:
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t173/EndlessMike9/drax/draxplanetbusting.jpgRips apart a planet and a Star:
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t173/EndlessMike9/drax/draxstarbusting.jpgDecided powersets according to whom? The handbooks? Like I said before, those are extremely flawed sources for power stats.
One should place characters based on their average performance seen in comic books. Every character has good and bad days but it's possible to find a level where they generally operate.
I would but I can't help myself after reading such ignorant posts.
Yes, I'm sure that's the only reason why. Personally, I want to make sure our discussion isn't interrupted at any point and it wouldn't in the vs. forum. I also don't want shitty excuses like "wrong forum" thrown around if you dislike the way the conversation is turning.
Are you like a dog with a bone?
So you'll ignore any evidence that doesn't fit into the limits set by handbooks? Is there any actual reason for this or is it just because?
Coward.
Are you joking or being serious? I cannot tell but I really hope you aren't. Thor is my area of expertise and handbooks have been oh so terribly incorrect about him as well as Odin.
I don't even know what the hell you're talking about here.
No one is forcing you to read them. 🙂
I won't however sit here while you making such incredibly ignorant statements regarding characters and how the medium works.
GTFO with that sh*t. Go back to the CBVF.
Edward can kick Sasquatch's ass. Deal with it and stop whining.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I won't however sit here while you making such incredibly ignorant statements regarding characters and how the medium works.
No, you'll just sit there and have to deal with someone stating their opinion. And you'll either like it or ignore it.
Thing is weaker than Edward. Deal with it. The handbooks are better than the actual comic books. Deal with it.
Oh, and, Thor is weaker than Thing at times. You going to rage at me about that, too?
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Gotta love preconceived notions and immaturity.Admit you're wrong? Never! Continue on arguing despite looking ignorant and foolish to avoid learning? Definitely.
Coming from the guy throwing out insults left and right. lol
Additionally, you came into this thread knowing full well that I said I IGNORE feats I don't like. Looks like you were just steaming to argue for no reason. Lame.
Edit - It is taking a lot to resist replying to your wrong points. pained So...very...hard.... pained
Originally posted by dadudemon
GTFO with that sh*t. Go back to the CBVF.Edward can kick Sasquatch's ass. Deal with it and stop whining.
Whining? I'm systematically destroying all your incredibly incorrect claims, the only one who seems to be whining here is you.
The only one here who has problems dealing with shit is once again (Surprise!) you.
Originally posted by dadudemon
No, you'll just sit there and have to deal with someone stating their opinion. And you'll either like it or ignore it.Thing is weaker than Edward. Deal with it. The handbooks are better than the actual comic books. Deal with it.
Oh, and, Thor is weaker than Thing at times. You going to rage at me about that, too?
Well, you can think whatever you want. The vast majority -writers and editors of the comics/handbooks included- would agree with my stance and I've thoroughly proved you wrong so I'm content.
😮💨
Originally posted by dadudemon
Coming from the guy throwing out insults left and right. lolAdditionally, you came into this thread knowing full well that I said I IGNORE feats I don't like. Looks like you were just steaming to argue for no reason. Lame.
Edit - It is taking a lot to resist replying to your wrong points. pained So...very...hard.... pained
I called you an idiot once, and all things considered it was a fairly accurate assessment. My point still stands, you are either a sorry excuse for a troll or a 10 year old.
Unfortunately I was well into the discussion before I discovered how far you'd go to maintain your ignorant stance.
It feels like I just got into an argument with a creationist. Ignorance is one thing, but willful ignorance? Few things irritate me as much, I've actually exercised considerable restraint in this particular discussion.
That's right, run away with your tail between your legs.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Whining? I'm systematically destroying all your incredibly incorrect claims, the only one who seems to be whining here is you.The only one here who has problems dealing with shit is once again (Surprise!) you.
Well, you can think whatever you want. The vast majority -writers and editors of the comics/handbooks included- would agree with my stance and I've thoroughly proved you wrong so I'm content.
😮💨
I called you an idiot once, and all things considered it was a fairly accurate assessment. My point still stands, you are either a sorry excuse for a troll or a 10 year old.
Unfortunately I was well into the discussion before I discovered how far you'd go to maintain your ignorant stance.
It feels like I just got into an argument with a creationist. Ignorance is one thing, but willful ignorance? Few things irritate me as much, I've actually exercised considerable restraint in this particular discussion.
That's right, run away with your tail between your legs.
I responded via PM. Enjoy. 🙂
Rage.Of.Olympus, I'm glad to see you posting in here, but I should make it clear that we don't go by comic book feats in the Movie Versus Forum. We go by what is seen on screen as canon. If you look at the stickied rules thread of the MVF, you'll see the "MVF Golden Rule" that implies on screen feats as canon.
If I allowed comic book feats to be integrated into movie fights, then it would be a splendiferous clusterf*ck.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I responded via PM. Enjoy. 🙂
😂
What on Earth makes you think I'd reply to that? I couldn't care less about changing your mind, you've made it clear that you'll ignore any evidence presented so why even bother?
The only reason I replied to your last post is because I enjoy highlighting your idiocy, something about you just screams point and laugh. Where's the fun in that if it isn't public?
Originally posted by Impediment
Rage.Of.Olympus, I'm glad to see you posting in here, but I should make it clear that we don't go by comic book feats in the Movie Versus Forum. We go by what is seen on screen as canon. If you look at the stickied rules thread of the MVF, you'll see the "MVF Golden Rule" that implies on screen feats as canon.If I allowed comic book feats to be integrated into movie fights, then it would be a splendiferous clusterf*ck.
My apologies. I wont derail this thread any more (If you have the balls to reply DDM, do it CBvs section), but it was never about using comic book feats for movie characters.
Thanks for the welcome.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
😂What on Earth makes you think I'd reply to that? I couldn't care less about changing your mind, you've made it clear that you'll ignore any evidence presented so why even bother?
The only reason I replied to your last post is because I enjoy highlighting your idiocy, something about you just screams point and laugh. Where's the fun in that if it isn't public?
(If you have the balls to reply DDM, do it CBvs section),
I responded via PM, again. Let's not derail this thread anymore. 🙂
