Hulk vs Thanos-The strongest there is

Started by Nihilist35 pages

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
[B]In a mental plane set up by a high level telepath that is assisting him and so long as you consider getting nearly destroyed the equivalent of "take on."
She did nothing in the actual battle,as clearly shown it was Thanos and Thanos alone that took on Galactus.
Moondragon statd that "Galactus was ready for us." Which means she wasn't just a passive observer. Thanos and Moondragon set up a trap and still failed.
😂 You know that was just a figure of speach, and Odin didnt exactly win in his TP battle with Galactus he had to retreat.

It's one glaring piece of evidence that shows that Thanos' telepathy is far inferior to Odin's.
Lulz, barring the Galactus encounter.

Nothing changes that Thanos got beat down by an Odin who was holding back. And that conclusion is what we agree on. Your red herrings change nothing.
Another dodge on the issue 👆 thought better of you to acknowledge the fact his stronger blasts werent used and would have had a effect.

Its funny the fact youre so keen to keep saying about Odin holding back yet, flat out refuse to even say Thanos may have been using his stronger ep.

So Much For Getting Tired Of This Hulk vs Thanos Debate 🙄

Originally posted by Nihilist
She did nothing in the actual battle,as clearly shown it was Thanos and Thanos alone that took on Galactus. 😂

You know that was just a figure of speach, and Odin didnt exactly win in his TP battle with Galactus he had to retreat.

Lulz, barring the Galactus encounter.

She was there. She set up the mental plane in their favor to glean information from Galactus. Thanos still had to get the phuck out or risk destruction. Thanos and Moondragon talked afterwards about how "Galactus was ready for us." Thanos even mentions that he wouldn't be using anymore of Moondragon's assistance because she was a "liability." You don't characterize someone as a liability if they were a completely passive observer. All that context doesn't just suggest that Thanos took advantage of Moondragon's telepathic assistance, it outright confirms that he did.

Don't even try to compare Thanos' telepathy with Odin's. It's good, and Thanos is a high-level telepath. But he's inferior to Odin by a wide margin, proven by Blood and Thunder and further supported by their respective tp battles against Galactus.

It's also clear you're failed to appreciate the respective goals Thanos and Odin had. Thanos tried to ambush Galactus with assistance to simply steal information under the pretense of a mere telepathic conversation. Odin engaged in outright telepathic warfare with Galactus. So not only did Thanos fail (despite having assistance), he failed in a goal that set its bar far lower than Odin set for himself. And Odin still performed better at his relatively far more difficult task without assistance.

Originally posted by Nihilist
Another dodge on the issue 👆 thought better of you to acknowledge the fact his stronger blasts werent used and would have had a effect.

Its funny the fact youre so keen to keep saying about Odin holding back yet, flat out refuse to even say Thanos may have been using his stronger ep.

I'm not entertaining your red herrings. You want to speculate that Thanos wasn't using stronger blasts and was countenancing getting thrown across the battlefield like a ragdoll? I couldn't care less. Even granting your speculative excuses, it was clear that Odin wasn't using his stronger blasts.

You haven't presented me any evidence of anything that I should even consider. You're asking me to confirm there was a possibility that Thanos may have been able to muster a stronger blast. Based on what? I can't rule anything 100% out but I'm not going to be pressed into proving a negative, i.e., prove Thanos didn't use his strongest blasts. And that's all you're doing. It;s about as cogent as me speculating that the blasts Thanos used in that fight were actually the strongest blasts he's used. Can you rule that out 100%? No, you can't. Does that speculation mean sh1t?

No, because it doesn't change sh1t: Thanos got wrecked by an Odin that clearly wasn't going all-out. <--- And that's the notion that I'm dealing with, because I can, in fact, prove Odin wasn't going all-out with clear evidence. It's the only notion I care to discuss because it doesn't involve red herrings based on nothing but speculation.

Maybe now you get why I'm not going to enter into this back-and-forth red herring crap. Because it's worthless and I expected you to realize how pointless it was. As it stands, you've proved to be a disappointment in this regard and made me spend a few paragraphs deconstructing it. I shouldn't have to waste electrons pointing this out. Don't make me do it again. Make a better argument.

Thanos CRUSHES The Hulk and it's really THAT easy. By the way... Thanos DID do better agaisnt Galactus than Odin did... Fact!! In TP and in battle ...

Hulk stomps

Carter.. I'm waiting on you to make a case on how Hulk wins...

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Carter.. I'm waiting on you to make a case on how Hulk wins...

Easily..

Going by fts, Hulk has melted Heralds without touching them.

Going by showings...an amped Thanos got overpowered and worked by Hulk and Drax (and he had to shrink them to get them off of him) whereas WBH fought similar beings and they couldnt even budge him, let alone damage him.

World Breaker Hulk would outright kill Thanos. WWH would be a better fight (even though he would pull a majority).

Originally posted by carver9
Easily..

Going by fts, Hulk has melted Heralds without touching them.

Going by showings...an amped Thanos got overpowered and worked by Hulk and Drax (and he had to shrink them to get them off of him) whereas WBH fought similar beings and they couldnt even budge him, let alone damage him.

World Breaker Hulk would outright kill Thanos. WWH would be a better fight (even though he would pull a majority).

You haven't proven your case. Thanos has slapped Hulk and Drax like women.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You haven't proven your case. Thanos has slapped Hulk and Drax like women.

Hulk and Drax have also laid waste to Thanos as well and Thanos was amped.

Originally posted by carver9
Hulk and Drax have also laid waste to Thanos as well and Thanos was amped.
Thanos defeated them while amped. he did so easily while it was an entire group of heroes attacking from all sides not just the two of them.

Originally posted by carver9
Easily..

Going by fts, Hulk has melted Heralds without touching them.

Going by showings...an amped Thanos got overpowered and worked by Hulk and Drax (and he had to shrink them to get them off of him) whereas WBH fought similar beings and they couldnt even budge him, let alone damage him.

World Breaker Hulk would outright kill Thanos. WWH would be a better fight (even though he would pull a majority).

Are you going in Carter mode here...

First, Thanos has OWEND the Hulk EACH AND EVERY TIME THEY HAVE EVER MET. The first time, he laughed at the one thing Hulk is known for and EASILY overpowered him WHILE HE HAD HELP.

Another interaction they had to guage their power was the Quasar shielding situation.. hulk was pounding on the shield alogn with many others.. NOTHING happened... Thanos one shots it with ease.

The next time they met... Thanos was PUTTING ON A SHOW and wasn't just attacked by Hulk and drax but attacked by all heroes... he easily dealt with Hulk there and won again. Don't also forget about him pimp slapping Hulk and Drax like red headed stepchild with ease.

The most recent time they met.. Thanos EASILY mindraped hulk with a mere thought. The way I count it.. That' is 3 -0 for Thanos against hulk in their history

Did Carver leave again.... Just as I thought...

Hulk, IMO

In overall powers and abilities, Thanos by light years!!

Hulk wins. damn near any marvel writer would write hulk as being physically stronger even if not by much.

Based on feats? Hulk

but is kind of unfair for Thanos because he is a villain and he is most likely to have less feats than Hulk.

He will probably have better vs feats, but not better lifting feats.

Originally posted by biensalsa
Based on feats? Hulk

but is kind of unfair for Thanos because he is a villain and he is most likely to have less feats than Hulk.

He will probably have better vs feats, but not better lifting feats.

You really determine superiority based off of feats. Shame.

Carver is still hiding from me...

Lol...you didn't say anything for me to hide from. I already gave my answer. Hulk is stronger, Hulk is more durable, faster, and more powerful. Hulk will pop Thanos head like a cherry.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Are you going in Carter mode here...

First, Thanos has OWEND the Hulk EACH AND EVERY TIME THEY HAVE EVER MET. The first time, he laughed at the one thing Hulk is known for and EASILY overpowered him WHILE HE HAD HELP.

Another interaction they had to guage their power was the Quasar shielding situation.. hulk was pounding on the shield alogn with many others.. NOTHING happened... Thanos one shots it with ease.

The next time they met... Thanos was PUTTING ON A SHOW and wasn't just attacked by Hulk and drax but attacked by all heroes... he easily dealt with Hulk there and won again. Don't also forget about him pimp slapping Hulk and Drax like red headed stepchild with ease.

The most recent time they met.. Thanos EASILY mindraped hulk with a mere thought. The way I count it.. That' is 3 -0 for Thanos against hulk in their history

Address the above quote