Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
It was an energy blast the originated from Thor, not a lightning bolt from the sky. Do you even read the scans I post?
Yes I read it. Thor say's he is the god of thunder and then you see a bolt from the sky aimed on him. Almost Shazam like. I seen that scan before though several times.
Depends on whether or not you count it as a God Blast. I personally don’t, ODG might. Either way, it’s sufficiently powerful enough to finish off Superman.
It's not a god blast so I disagree. It may hurt Superman but Superman at his best has endured far worst magical blasts and remained in the fight. He even endured Kryptonite and Red Sun radiation when he was determined enough.
It was an omni-directional explosion when Thor struck the Midgard Serpent, it counts.
No it wasn't. It was multi-directional but not omni.
Still sufficiently powerful enough to suit the needs of this discussion.
No it isn't. Supes can avoid it if it's not omnidirectional or just by attacking Thor before he does it. And it isn't powerful enough to finish Superman off, maybe hurt him but not finish him off.
Please stop talking out of your ass, it was cannon.
I accepted it, did you read ALL of my post? Why waste your time and energy here?
What’s your definition of omni-directional?
ALL directions covered. No space between.
What the hell are you talking about? We can see the energy blast being projected from Thor.
I said I accept that one too. Read my post again. It just look like something from the top though. Why talk as if I didn't accept it?
In all of those instances I posted, he draws the energy into the hammer. Thor pointing Mjolnir at the source isn’t prove that he can’t absorb energy without pointing in that direction.
I have no idea why I’m indulging your stupidity but here he doesn’t even point the hammer towards the energy source:
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/NullBombAbsorb.jpg
You didn't understand me. I said a BEAM. He can't absorb a beam (like a laser) without pointing towards the beam. For, example if a beam is shot from behind him. Then even if Mjolnir can try to absorb it, the beam would go straight through Thor (if it is strong enough) in order for Mjolnir to try to absorb is since the angle of the beam with the hammer is negligible. Note: This is assuming that Thor can even absorb beams without even blocking the beam straight on.
Skuttlebutt flies past Thor at many times the speed of light. The Odinson turns around and immediately catches up to it. This proves that he doesn’t need to whirl his hammer or any other such bullshit to hit speeds far faster than light.
Huh? I never said Thor needs to whirl the hammer to fly faster than light. I said he needs the whirl it to throw the hammer faster than light. Once in flight Thor can always accelerate without whirling the hammer. You got me all messed up here. Also, it took Thor time to catch up with it, it wasn't instant. Also, I'm referring to speed from rest and not speed when someone is already going faster than light. It takes time for Thor to reach light speed from rest. This is all that matters in this fight.
I’m not going to indulge your trolling.
How did I troll? I accepted some of the feats as omnidirectional. I even made new arguments for them. But clearly you are arguing for ODG since he was the one who claimed GOD blast when it wasn't shown to be.
Not a likely scenario.He isn’t withstanding those attacks and then counterattacking in that manner.
You claim that the scene with Durok is irrelevant and yet you reference it here as evidence that a God Blast weakens Thor?
I’ve proven otherwise.
It's more likely than Thor doing a omnidirectional blast from the bell. If he does it then Superman pops him before he tries or at worst Superman withstands enough HV through Thor.
It wasn't a god blast. Comics already portrayed the God blast weakening Thor after awhile of emitting it. Should we throw that out? Or should we accept (without on panel evidence) that Thor contradicts what was shown before and can God blast for eternity without ever getting weak from it?
1) Like I said, depends entirely on ODG definition. If he wants to call it a God Blast type attack, you are really in no position to argue with him.
Of course I am. Actually it isn't an opinion. Nothing exists in comics until proven otherwise. The onus is to prove it is a God blast. After all he made the claim. If he can't do that then it isn't by default (and thus a fact).
2) That’s a blatant lie.
If it is a lie then which scan shows Thor absorbing a BEAM without pointing towards it?
3) That’s a blatant lie.
Show me the scan where Thor reaches light speed from rest without any time passing by and then it will be an untruth on my part (not a blatant lie though lol).
4) What?
I brought that point up against ODG and it wasn't refuted by the scans.
