Originally posted by Enzeru
Everything I need to say right now would actually be "the Flash". That guy is bending the laws of physics since 1940.The entire concent behind the Flash-character is entire bullcrap and that's coming out of my mouth, someone who used to have a huge Flash-fetish some time ago. I even bought the entire Flash series from the 90 for my girlfriend, so that she could watch it too.
But there Flash was awesome.Everything in comics is plain old bullcrap. Him saving 500.000 people in 0.00001 seconds? Flash could solo the entire planet in under 5 seconds, if he feels like it. And then you have characters like Zoom, who are even faster then Flash? And basically not even one comic book reader understands their powers.
Marvel never pulled off something as stupid as that and actually tried to explain it with the laws of physics, like the Flash writers are sometimes trying to do it desperately.
I mean, okay Marvel has his weird-o's too like the reality warpers and so on, but that's something I can go with. They change the reality, good for them. They manipulate the molecules, awesome.But the Flash? Non-sense and I actually really like the Flash. I would like to have his powers, but they're as unrealistic as purple crap.
Flash moving at light speed and phasing through solid objects, just because he can control every single atom in his body simultaneously and phasing through solid objects? Bullcrap. If someone runs with the speed of light towards a wall, he destroys it, or he kills himself, what ever.
But the speed force gives the hosts the ability to add a protective field, bullrush through basically everything, or simply phase through it.Marvel pulled off something like that too and that's a pity. Since the mutant speed was also able to phase through solid objects once.
It's a difference if someone has the ability to control the atoms thanks to his power set (like the Sentry) and if someone phases through solid objects by being fast (like the Flash).But the Flash is not even the worst DC characters, when it comes to logic. I really, really light Nightwing. He is one of my favorite characters and the same goes for the Red Hood, but I often pity that they're parts of the Batfamily. I ... HATE ... And I really, really mean it: I HATE BATMAN.
In my opinion, Batman is one of the biggest abortions the comics ever came up with. That guy sees his parents getting murdered and wants to avenge them. So far so good. He becomes the Batman and he wants to protect the people. So far so good, but then it starts getting downhill.
He has a bunch of rogues, who are mostly all just ordinary people with guns. They're psychopaths and they get arrested over and over again. He often busts him himself, puts him into Arkham and then they escape, kill 10 people, and if it's the Joker, he kills 100 people, without having a reason. Batman catches him and puts him into Arkham, Joker breaks out and kills 200 people.Batman has the advantage over the Joker. He could kill him with mere punches, but he never does something like that, because he does not want to become like them. So he captures them, they break out and kill 300 people. People who had families, yet Batman is totally fine with that. He never changes his way. It's like he is into the adventures and likes chasing them, yet he always talks about the mission and abbandons his friends for the sake of the mission, yet he always fails to do the right thing. To kill these psychopaths and save thousands of people in the future.
Additionally to that he really like to train children, who are at the age of 10 more skilled then everyone Gotham City throws at them and that without having super powers. No matter if you shoot with a AK-47 at them, they dodge everything.Gotham City sucks. Their policemen are are in love with the villains. They would never even think about killing someone like the Joker, who simply stands around, wide open for assassination, yet they don't shoot.
And then we have the big, blue boyscout. A character like the Sentry. Either you like him, or you hate him.
For me Superman is one of the most writer-wanked characters ever created and the Silver Age was the prime-time for that.
No matter what obstacle you throw at him, he is better in everything, and only he. He is a Kryptonian, just like Supergirl, Power Girl and so on, yet he is the only who is immune to simply everything what could become dangerous to him and no matter if he faces god, he has a fair fighting chance.
He is an ode to the superheroes the old geezers of writers grew up with and they would never throw at him some real problems, since he is Superman after all.
He has an arch-enemy and it's Lex Luthor, the guy could heal cancer in a matter of days, but he simply chooses not to, because he hates Superman and wants to take him down and it's not like he is the only shitty, unrealistic villain in DC.
Your infomation is outdated.
Plus, the X-Men.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank"Issues" that didn't prevent him from turning him into a plant. It's a high feat for his healing factor, if anything. After all, Molecule Man had no issue with turning Ares, who has his own healing factor, into metal. Or turning Bullseye and his adamantium laced spine into living water.
Personally, I don't think Molecule Man as he was portrayed in Dark Avengers would beat the shit out of Thanos. He had issues dealing with Daken's healing factor and was threatened by nukes. It would be pushing it calling him Skyfather, let alone higher.
And I would disagree with your use of the term, "threatened." He waved them off with his hands. Thanos has blocked Mjolnir too with raised hands. I wouldn't characterize Thanos as being threatened.
Even I forget this often: Molecule Man may have lost to Sentry, but Molecule Man destroyed/recomposed Sentry three times over until Sentry finally got the hang of it.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
"Issues" that didn't prevent him from turning him into a plant. It's a high feat for his healing factor, if anything. After all, Molecule Man had no issue with turning Ares, who has his own healing factor, into metal. Or turning Bullseye and his adamantium laced spine into living water.And I would disagree with your use of the term, "threatened." He waved them off with his hands. Thanos has blocked Mjolnir too with raised hands. I wouldn't characterize Thanos as being threatened.
Even I forget this often: Molecule Man may have lost to Sentry, but Molecule Man destroyed/recomposed Sentry three times over until Sentry finally got the hang of it.
Amen.
jesus! my god, somebody broke quanchi....
I say this is a draw as Sentry going all out would tend towards wide-area damage (as he did against Hulk) rather than trying to focus that power on one specific target.
Thanos, like Hulk, should be able to comfortably tank what Sentry's outputting, but I doubt he can wear down Sentry as Hulk did... so stalemate.
Originally posted by janus77By broke do you mean taking a few days off but already getting the last word in. Because quan doesn't break.
jesus! my god, somebody broke quanchi....I say this is a draw as Sentry going all out would tend towards wide-area damage (as he did against Hulk) rather than trying to focus that power on one specific target.
Thanos, like Hulk, should be able to comfortably tank what Sentry's outputting, but I doubt he can wear down Sentry as Hulk did... so stalemate.
Thanos vs Void
Thanos vs Void
For the purposes of this thread We have Bob getting "access" or unleashing the Void, going Voidtry or whatever you want to call it. THIS IS NO WIMPY CRY BABY BOB
NO Outside amps
No BFR, CIS OFF.
This is no BS scenario, everything can be destroyed like it will really happen in a fight between this two.
There is nothing to debate about this matter. Thanos wins 11/10.
Originally posted by TheHulk
Crybaby Sentry loses
Top of game Sentry spilt or Thanos
Voidtry wins 6.9/10
Void 8/10
Originally posted by SamZED
Void.
Originally posted by yaadaveyaa
VOID EASILY
