Full Power Tyrant vs Thanos...

Started by Stoic9 pages
Originally posted by Sirius77
Damn there were some good points made in this thread. I really don't see how tyrant wouldn't take this definitively.

The writers of Marvel, including the person that created Thanos could come to this forum, and tell Quanchi, that he is not beating Tyrant of any stature, and Quanchi would likely tell them that they are wrong, and that he is right. This is all because Quanchi, doesn't seem to enjoy defeat.

Thanos is not challenging Tyrant, and he certainly won't make Galactus, Odin, Zeus, Seth, or anyof these guys sweat too hard. One day Thanos will get the butt kicking of a life time, and on that day I hope Quanchi will be able to live with it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos has faced off against Maker and won. Thanos did show he had the power to launch Galactus hundreds of yards into the air while he was well nourished. Galactus is more powerful than Tyrant. Tyrant has a body so does the Maker. Thanos didn't kill her but physically was causing her pain.
It hurt him obviously but not significantly at that point. That was before his upgrade anyway.
Galactus was trying to kill Thanos and by doing so he depleted vital energies which suggests Tyrant does the same and gets weaker faster.

Thanos is more durable/more powerful and immune to death.

Tyrant isn't as powerful as Galactus and he depleted himself just through one shield.

Thanos wins a battle of attrition.

It's only a battle of attrition when both sides sustain and deal damage until 1 outlasts the other at great cost. Thanos was dead with 2 blasts from G.That Galactus was considerably less prepared for battle than against Fp Tyrant. What can Thanos do to Tyrant? Beating lord marvel is not impressive.

Thanos was killed by a bomb. Do you believe that Fp tyrant has insufficient power to attain the same effects.

Nothing displayed in Thanos imperative remotely suggests he has a boost in power that enables him to hang with the likes of Fp tyrant. Certainly not durability since he was exploded by drax bomb. Thanos has never beaten someone on depowered tyrants level, nevermind Fp tyrant. He's shown he is unable to hang with beings of that power. Tyrant isn't mentally insecure or unstable like beyonder. Thanos hasn't beaten anyone on tyrants level. He already withdrew before, so we know Thanos is ultimately afraid to confront tyrant. Why would he suddenly find the courage to do so now. The "amp" from death allowed him to best lord Marvell. No where in the story did he face anyone on tyrants level so from the get go your position is undermined.

Originally posted by Stoic
The writers of Marvel, including the person that created Thanos could come to this forum, and tell Quanchi, that he is not beating Tyrant of any stature, and Quanchi would likely tell them that they are wrong, and that he is right. This is all because Quanchi, doesn't seem to enjoy defeat.

Thanos is not challenging Tyrant, and he certainly won't make Galactus, Odin, Zeus, Seth, or anyof these guys sweat too hard. One day Thanos will get the butt kicking of a life time, and on that day I hope Quanchi will be able to live with it.

😂

Originally posted by Stoic
The writers of Marvel, including the person that created Thanos could come to this forum, and tell Quanchi, that he is not beating Tyrant of any stature, and Quanchi would likely tell them that they are wrong, and that he is right. This is all because Quanchi, doesn't seem to enjoy defeat.

Thanos is not challenging Tyrant, and he certainly won't make Galactus, Odin, Zeus, Seth, or anyof these guys sweat too hard. One day Thanos will get the butt kicking of a life time, and on that day I hope Quanchi will be able to live with it.

Agreed. I don't know much about tyrant other than his fight with thanos while depowered, but you pretty much spelled it out as to why he's winning lol.

Originally posted by Stoic
No I'm not. There are several debaters on this forum that I would never dream of getting into it with. I just simply have my opinion based on this particular thread, and its subject matter.
But You Debate damn well better than any i've seen...

Originally posted by Stoic
As far as I know, you were reaching, and i beat you several posts ago.

👆

Originally posted by King Kandy
Far less has put him down when he is starving or near death. This was a Galactus well fed and prepared for battle and not even 5 CCs can put him down. Even Thanos himself, could do Galactus no harm as he can reconstitute such minor injuries without effort, even destroying his body to nothingness could not slay him in such a state. Even if he could not kill Thanos he could subdue him much as the CC could.
A depowered Tyrant was putting down a well fed and prepared Galactus. Do you think a depowered Tyrant is equal to 5 cc's ? I for one don't. If his entire body is destroyed that's a loss according to most posters anyway. So no you can't have it both ways most posters now agree destroying a body is a win. Either way you look at it if it isn't a win Thanos can't die Galactus can. Galactus will tire out Thanos won't.

Galactus depleted vital energies in breaching one shield. That's a fact. Thanos did injure him just not significantly enough.

The cc didn't subdue him alone it was only that which opened him up to being mindlocked at this critical moment against a feral Thanos.

Originally posted by Stoic
As far as I know, you were reaching, and i beat you several posts ago.
No, as far as I know you lost already. It's quite clear you aren't getting it so I will further explain it. Any other writers outside Thanos Imperative doesn't pertain to how he was portrayed in that arc. Galactus was losing despite having major backup in the cancerverse. Thanos meanwhile through his actions alone destroyed the entire universe and was capable of delivering permanent death. That should tell you right there he beats depowered Tyrant since even Galactus was nothing in this story but a mere pawn.

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
It's only a battle of attrition when both sides sustain and deal damage until 1 outlasts the other at great cost. Thanos was dead with 2 blasts from G.That Galactus was considerably less prepared for battle than against Fp Tyrant. What can Thanos do to Tyrant? Beating lord marvel is not impressive.

Thanos was killed by a bomb. Do you believe that Fp tyrant has insufficient power to attain the same effects.

Thanos was never killed so two blasts is speculation and you are forgetting about his upgrade. Galactus was fully prepared against depowered Tyrant. The outcome was going to be different but Galactus wasn't caught unprepared. That's you trying to put a spin on it because you didn't like the outcome. Beating Lord Mar-vell is very impressive. Being starved out by Beta Ray Bill is not impressive however.

Nothing displayed in Thanos imperative remotely suggests he has a boost in power that enables him to hang with the likes of Fp tyrant. Certainly not durability since he was exploded by drax bomb. Thanos has never beaten someone on depowered tyrants level, nevermind Fp tyrant. He's shown he is unable to hang with beings of that power. Tyrant isn't mentally insecure or unstable like beyonder. Thanos hasn't beaten anyone on tyrants level. He already withdrew before, so we know Thanos is ultimately afraid to confront tyrant. Why would he suddenly find the courage to do so now. The "amp" from death allowed him to best lord Marvell. No where in the story did he face anyone on tyrants level so from the get go your position is undermined. [/B]
Thanos was delivering permanent death in the cancerverse something Galactus wasn't 'even capable of. The avatar of death was on a scale of the major abstracts of the universe. Thanos was weakened against the bomb. Galactus has been knocked on his ass by the Thing and his helmet severely damaged by Thor. Thanos has beaten cube beings and quite easily. Thanos as avatar of death was stomping unkillable beings and yet in the same story Galactus was unable to kill anyone. 🙂

Thanos wasn't afraid of Tyrant he already stole and withstood his assaults preupgrade.

Thanos is a lot more powerful and durable since becoming the avatar of death.

Quanchi, even if the writer of Thanos Imperative told you that Thanos would not be able to beat Tyrant even with the aid of Lord Mar-Vell, you would still tell them that they were wrong, and that you are right. You simply have an over inflated ego, which is exactly why you refuse to give this futile debate up. You simply hate losing. All of the posters that posted saying that Thanos would not win are not wrong. You are I wouldn't be surprised if you opened 3 separate sock accounts and placed the 4 votes yourself.

Most of the things that you are claiming were not even stated in the TI arc. You think that since Thanos holds the title of being the Avatar of Death, that this somehow means that he has the power of Lady Death herself. You would be right, except for one thing, it never once stated on panel that he had gotten a physical boost, it was only stated that he was simply the bane of the Ftahng Club. You claim that because a feat-less dagger broke on his skin that he has somehow become more than he once was. This is speculation that no one with a brain in their heads would agree to, simply because holding such a strong stance, demands an equally strong amount of evidence. Your evidence pales in comparison to you argument.

You are wrong, and simply made more out of many aspects in that comic arc than there actually was. I could see the writer looking at you and saying "WTF are you talking about", while scratching his head. You know how ridiculous a claim this is? If Thanos was so much more powerful than Odin, Zeus, Tyrant, Seth, Galactus, or anyone close to those classes, he would have been able to do at least what Thor did when he dented America's Shield. He didn't even make a scratch on it.

Feats Quanchi!!! Feats are what make people listen to the absurd, and what you have suggested all along, is just that. Absurd.

Originally posted by Stoic
Quanchi, even if the writer of Thanos Imperative told you that Thanos would not be able to beat Tyrant even with the aid of Lord Mar-Vell, you would still tell them that they were wrong, and that you are right. You simply have an over inflated ego, which is exactly why you refuse to give this futile debate up. You simply hate losing. All of the posters that posted saying that Thanos would not win are not wrong. You are I wouldn't be surprised if you opened 3 separate sock accounts and placed the 4 votes yourself.
Even if the writer told you as avatar odf death he could you wouldn't listen. The point is the writers haven't said as much so please pull yourself together. You're so wrapped up in this you admitted you want Thanos to lose. When you admit to hoping for an outcome you lost all objectivity. Yes, you are right they are wrong.

Most of the things that you are claiming were not even stated in the TI arc. You think that since Thanos holds the title of being the Avatar of Death, that this somehow means that he has the power of Lady Death herself. You would be right, except for one thing, it never once stated on panel that he had gotten a physical boost, it was only stated that he was simply the bane of the Ftahng Club. You claim that because a feat-less dagger broke on his skin that he has somehow become more than he once was. This is speculation that no one with a brain in their heads would agree to, simply because holding such a strong stance, demands an equally strong amount of evidence. Your evidence pales in comparison to you argument.[/B]
Thanos had the power to cause permanent death to Immortal beings. No one else in the arc which included Galactus could do so. I am not making this up I am simply calling a spade a spade. The sword was stated with having the power to kill gods yet it couldn't even make him bleed that's an upgrade my friend especially when we look at the fact a cc didn't even destroy him when unleashed upon him.

Thanos is just too much here. It' time for you to concede unlike you are claiming full powered Tyrant is more powerful than Galactus and other abstracts in the Thanos Imperative story who failed to cause permanent death in the story Thanos did so, easily.


You are wrong, and simply made more out of many aspects in that comic arc than there actually was. I could see the writer looking at you and saying "WTF are you talking about", while scratching his head. You know how ridiculous a claim this is? If Thanos was so much more powerful than Odin, Zeus, Tyrant, Seth, Galactus, or anyone close to those classes, he would have been able to do at least what Thor did when he dented America's Shield. He didn't even make a scratch on it.

Feats Quanchi!!! Feats are what make people listen to the absurd, and what you have suggested all along, is just that. Absurd. [/B]

Thanos caused death to those who were unkillable. What did regular Thor dent his shield ? When did Galactus kill anyone in the cancerverse ?

Thanos killed immortals, manhandled Mar-vell, took a cc blast and still wasn't out down, took out billions on the ucot's homeworld while naked and mindless. Feats support Thanos.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Even if the writer told you as avatar odf death he could you wouldn't listen. The point is the writers haven't said as much so please pull yourself together. You're so wrapped up in this you admitted you want Thanos to lose. When you admit to hoping for an outcome you lost all objectivity. Yes, you are right they are wrong.
Thanos had the power to cause permanent death to Immortal beings. No one else in the arc which included Galactus could do so. I am not making this up I am simply calling a spade a spade. The sword was stated with having the power to kill gods yet it couldn't even make him bleed that's an upgrade my friend especially when we look at the fact a cc didn't even destroy him when unleashed upon him.

Thanos is just too much here. It' time for you to concede unlike you are claiming full powered Tyrant is more powerful than Galactus and other abstracts in the Thanos Imperative story who failed to cause permanent death in the story Thanos did so, easily.
Thanos caused death to those who were unkillable. What did regular Thor dent his shield ? When did Galactus kill anyone in the cancerverse ?

Thanos killed immortals, manhandled Mar-vell, took a cc blast and still wasn't out down, took out billions on the ucot's homeworld while naked and mindless. Feats support Thanos.

Without all of the bells and whistles that came with T mans new power, the Sentry replicated it. He also ripped an immortal in half effectively causing him to truly die. Ares was truly immortal. big whup! This is simply not strong enough evidence to say that Thanos wouldn't be knocked the hell out by the big boys, and revisit that non canon event when he was shackled and taken upstate. So what if he can't die. This would likely please Tyrant, as he would then have an inexhaustible fuel supply to help power his dreaded citadel.

Originally posted by Stoic
Without all of the bells and whistles that came with T mans new power, the Sentry replicated it. He also ripped an immortal in half effectively causing him to truly die. Ares was truly immortal. big whup! This is simply not strong enough evidence to say that Thanos wouldn't be knocked the hell out by the big boys, and revisit that non canon event when he was shackled and taken upstate. So what if he can't die. This would likely please Tyrant, as he would then have an inexhaustible fuel supply to help power his dreaded citadel.
Ares could die the cancerverse people were beyond it. If you can't tell the difference between someone unkillable and Ares I can see why you can't get this debate right either.

Thanos was in the same arc as the big boys. His actions destroyed the universe their actions didn't. 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos was never killed so two blasts is speculation and you are forgetting about his upgrade. Galactus was fully prepared against depowered Tyrant. The outcome was going to be different but Galactus wasn't caught unprepared. That's you trying to put a spin on it because you didn't like the outcome. Beating Lord Mar-vell is very impressive. Being starved out by Beta Ray Bill is not impressive however.
Thanos was delivering permanent death in the cancerverse something Galactus wasn't 'even capable of. The avatar of death was on a scale of the major abstracts of the universe. Thanos was weakened against the bomb. Galactus has been knocked on his ass by the Thing and his helmet severely damaged by Thor. Thanos has beaten cube beings and quite easily. Thanos as avatar of death was stomping unkillable beings and yet in the same story Galactus was unable to kill anyone. 🙂

Thanos wasn't afraid of Tyrant he already stole and withstood his assaults preupgrade.

Thanos is a lot more powerful and durable since becoming the avatar of death.

No, you're not going to accuse Me of speculation when the most you can do is speculate yourself.tyrant>>>>Lord marvel. Yet you have zero proof that his upgrade can allow him to do more than kill a bunch of clone avengers and a few members of the gog. All of a sudden you are speculating that he can hang with dp tyrant because he put down people who are street level compared to Fp tyrant.

You are at a total loss in making a rebuttle that all FP tyrant need do is equate or exceed the damage output of 1 bomb.

Galacgus has nothing to do with this. He was weak from annihilation. Meanwhile DP tyrant wasn't challenged by Thanos with an amp. Thanos Ran. That fight is the first and foremost piece of evidence in any tyrant Thanos debate. You cannot escape this.

FP Tyrant absolutely demolish Thanos

Originally posted by King Kandy

Galactus tops a CC any day, Magus needed five to blow him up and
even then he would have reconstituted anyway. 1 cc can put down
Thanos while not even 5 can put down Galactus for long.


I have to disagree KK.

CC obliterates Galactus any day.

Magus never intended to permanently harm Galactus,
he only wanted to stall him
cause Galactus was reaching the transmitters faster than Magus had calculated.

But Magus was counting on Galactus reconstituting himself,
because it was part of Magus' plan.

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
No, you're not going to accuse Me of speculation when the most you can do is speculate yourself.tyrant>>>>Lord marvel. Yet you have zero proof that his upgrade can allow him to do more than kill a bunch of clone avengers and a few members of the gog. All of a sudden you are speculating that he can hang with dp tyrant because he put down people who are street level compared to Fp tyrant.
There is no proof Tyrant is greater than Lord Mar-vell though I agree he is. There is proof Thanos is far greater than Mar-vell on panel.

You are at a total loss in making a rebuttle that all FP tyrant need do is equate or exceed the damage output of 1 bomb. [/B]
Thanos was weakened at the time of the bomb. Try actually being aware of the facts before you claim something so ridiculous. Somehow Galactus being weakened counts whereas Thanos being weakened doesn't. Manhandling Lord Mar-vell isn't street level nor is Cancerverse's Hulk.

Galacgus has nothing to do with this. He was weak from annihilation. Meanwhile DP tyrant wasn't challenged by Thanos with an amp. Thanos Ran. That fight is the first and foremost piece of evidence in any tyrant Thanos debate. You cannot escape this. [/B]
So Galactus being weak from annihilation shows how long it can take for him to recover further asserting my claim he loses too much power fighting Thanos.

Thanos withstood his might and power right on panel. Tyrant was surprised. Thanos is a lot more powerful since then. Thanos wins.

Originally posted by Mr Master
I have to disagree KK.

CC obliterates Galactus any day.

Magus never intended to permanently harm Galactus,
he only wanted to stall him
cause Galactus was reaching the transmitters faster than Magus had calculated.

But Magus was counting on Galactus reconstituting himself,
because it was part of Magus' plan.

👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
There is no proof Tyrant is greater than Lord Mar-vell though I agree he is. There is proof Thanos is far greater than Mar-vell on panel.
Thanos was weakened at the time of the bomb. Try actually being aware of the facts before you claim something so ridiculous. Somehow Galactus being weakened counts whereas Thanos being weakened doesn't. Manhandling Lord Mar-vell isn't street level nor is Cancerverse's Hulk.
So Galactus being weak from annihilation shows how long it can take for him to recover further asserting my claim he loses too much power fighting Thanos.

Thanos withstood his might and power right on panel. Tyrant was surprised. Thanos is a lot more powerful since then. Thanos wins.

Lord marvel beat nova and ss effortlessly, something tyrant already did with a more powerful group.

And again, you arr speculating that the time interim from the bomb and the last page of the comic increase thanos' durability to be able to withstand FP tyrant. Show me scans that proves he can withstand a series of blasts from someone on FP tyrants level. Thanos ran when galactus was released in annihilation so we know he feared for his life. He outright stated on panel he intended to run. Where is your proof that he has the power to tank blasts of that nature. Im not talking about 3 blasts. Im talking about an all a
out assault.

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
Lord marvel beat nova and ss effortlessly, something tyrant already did with a more powerful group.
Tyrant did so but then again the initial encounter he had drones present as well. Both are above elite top tiers.

And again, you arr speculating that the time interim from the bomb and the last page of the comic increase thanos' durability to be able to withstand FP tyrant. Show me scans that proves he can withstand a series of blasts from someone on FP tyrants level. Thanos ran when galactus was released in annihilation so we know he feared for his life. He outright stated on panel he intended to run. Where is your proof that he has the power to tank blasts of that nature. Im not talking about 3 blasts. Im talking about an all a
out assault. [/B]
Yes, since a cc didn't obliterate him. Somehow the time from annihilation Galactus couldn't even get back to full power and the short time Thanos had to recover the cc and mindlock is somehow not using a double standard.

Thanos wasn't upgraded until Imperative so anything prior to is irrelevant. Even a weaker Thanos showed the power necessary to send Galactus hundreds of yards away.

Annihilus himself withstood the assault and then had Nova rip off his jaw so Thanos definitely tanks that since he can tank a cc blast aimed directly at him.

Thanos wins.

thanos is a very weak villain and a shitty character, tyrant kills this pathetic joke of a cosmic character easily.