Full Power Tyrant vs Thanos...

Started by Power Cosmic II9 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
Tyrant did so but then again the initial encounter he had drones present as well. Both are above elite top tiers.
Yes, since a cc didn't obliterate him. Somehow the time from annihilation Galactus couldn't even get back to full power and the short time Thanos had to recover the cc and mindlock is somehow not using a double standard.

Thanos wasn't upgraded until Imperative so anything prior to is irrelevant. Even a weaker Thanos showed the power necessary to send Galactus hundreds of yards away.

Annihilus himself withstood the assault and then had Nova rip off his jaw so Thanos definitely tanks that since he can tank a cc blast aimed directly at him.

Thanos wins.

Starlord never meant to kill Thanos and if you're going to use that point in time to measure durability, the bomb feat comes After starlord using the CC. So either its before the bomb or after. Either way it doesn't look good which is why I led you into bringing up the CC. And if prior Thanos is irrelevant, then you have already conceded since TI imperative has absolutely no feats that put him anywhere on FP tyrants level. NONE.

thanos is barely above gamora's level.

Originally posted by strikerxx
thanos is barely above gamora's level.
Quite Comicvine Troll

Originally posted by King Kandy

Far less has put him down when he is starving or near death. This was a Galactus well fed and prepared for battle and not even 5 CCs
can put him down. Even Thanos himself, could do Galactus no harm as
he can reconstitute such minor injuries without effort, even destroying
his body to nothingness could not slay him in such a state.

Magus never intended to permanently kill Galactus,
in fact,
he only meant to slow Galactus down,
cause Galactus was reaching the Universe where the relay transmitters were ahead of Magus' schedule.

So from who knows how many Universes away where the actual CCUs were,
Magus with the click of a switch,
blows Galactus and his mighty ship to pieces which was 3 Universes away from the transmitters.

(Infinity War #3)

But ... Magus never intended to stop Galactus completely,
only to stall him,
in fact, Magus was even a bit worried that Galactus may not be able to reform.

(Infinity War #4)

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
Starlord never meant to kill Thanos and if you're going to use that point in time to measure durability, the bomb feat comes After starlord using the CC. So either its before the bomb or after. Either way it doesn't look good which is why I led you into bringing up the CC. And if prior Thanos is irrelevant, then you have already conceded since TI imperative has absolutely no feats that put him anywhere on FP tyrants level. NONE.
Magus didn't intend to either yet Galactus was completely destroyed. The only time Thanos was at full power was prior the cc/mindlock.

Cc's can completely destroy Galactus let alone Tyrant who isn't as powerful as Galactus. I rest my case.

Thanos wins this anyway you choose to look at it.

quanchi tongue must be purple from sucking thanos off all day

Originally posted by strikerxx
quanchi tongue must be purple from sucking thanos off all day
That isn't debating. 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
That isn't debating. 🙂

It might not be debating, but it probaly true!

😉

💃

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
It might not be debating, but it probaly true!

😉

💃

The only thing i know is Thanos is winning this thread among others.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The only thing i know is Thanos is winning this thread among others.

Full Powered Tyrant = Galactus.

Thanos was begging Galactus to spare his life.

Galactus > Tyrant when it comes to terms of mercy

Thanos would be begging Tyrant to spare his life.

Thanos <<< Tyrant, who would manhandle Thanos, like I did it to you in the "Sentry VS Thanos" thread.

Originally posted by Enzeru
Full Powered Tyrant = Galactus.

Thanos was begging Galactus to spare his life.

Galactus > Tyrant when it comes to terms of mercy

Thanos would be begging Tyrant to spare his life.

Thanos <<< Tyrant, who would manhandle Thanos, like I did it to you in the "Sentry VS Thanos" thread.

Actually, no since Galactus won.

Thanos has been upgraded since then. Galactus depleted vital energies against one shield.

Are you still waiting for my response it's been done for over a day just playing with you on when I will it.

Clearly Tyrant wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Are you still waiting for my response it's been done for over a day just playing with you on when I will it.

What response? You died as soon you opened the thread.

since thanos's upgrade with the ability to not die has he fought anyone of substantal power?

Originally posted by zeel
since thanos's upgrade with the ability to not die has he fought anyone of substantal power?

Well he fought Lord Mar-Vell who decisively killed the Magus. Although to be honest there is some context to this. Magus was not expecting the attack, and was basically back stabbed. In the video game industry, back stabs often hit with far greater power, because they aren't expected, okay video games are silly to use as an example? How about this, Houdini died because he didn't expect a gut shot so back stabs being deadly in games are justified.

Also Mar-Vell had Nova at his mercy, and broke the Silver Surfer's board, but then again Terrax has cut his board in half with the ease of a pairing knife passing through cheese. Just saying that it's been done before.

Thanos easily subdued Lord Mar-Vell, which leads many to believe that Thanos may have gotten a physical upgrade without taking into account that he may have been able to do this before he was resurrected, but there is really no concrete evidence to support this notion. Oh and a dagger called the God Slayer broke on Thanos' skin which I guess is supposed to be more impressive than him surviving a black hole, even though the dagger lacks feats to rest on this idea.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Magus didn't intend to either yet Galactus was completely destroyed. The only time Thanos was at full power was prior the cc/mindlock.

Cc's can completely destroy Galactus let alone Tyrant who isn't as powerful as Galactus. I rest my case.

Thanos wins this anyway you choose to look at it.

Galactus has nothing to do with this. It's not even a relevant comparison since Magus had 5 fully functional, intact CC's and Starlord had 1 cracked, drained CC. He didn't attempt to kill Thanos and KO'd him with 1 blast. Drop this comparison because I'm not buying starlord's ghetto ass cosmic cube is equivalent to the top shelf wares that Magus was rolling with. 5>>>>1 (that's 4 arrows). No use continuing with this line of logic. 5 is larger than 1 all day, every day.

Thanos does not have the damage output necessary to compromise Tyrant. If he does, I'm waiting for you to give me evidence from TI that confirms he has damage sufficient to put Tyrant down.

Beating marvel with with his fists doesn't cut it.

And again, you have wild speculation that the most powerful thanos was was immediately after emerging from the cocoon.

The point is irrelevant anyway since the OP never stipulated "Thanos as he was right after emerging from the cocoon."

His durability was breached by 1 bomb. That's a fact and you have no way of getting around that whatsoever. FP Tyrant shits a blast out and it's more powerful than that bomb, which obliterated Thanos.

Originally posted by Stoic
Well he fought Lord Mar-Vell who decisively killed the Magus. Although to be honest there is some context to this. Magus was not expecting the attack, and was basically back stabbed. In the video game industry, back stabs often hit with far greater power, because they aren't expected, okay video games are silly to use as an example? How about this, Houdini died because he didn't expect a gut shot so back stabs being deadly in games are justified.

Also Mar-Vell had Nova at his mercy, and broke the Silver Surfer's board, but then again Terrax has cut his board in half with the ease of a pairing knife passing through cheese. Just saying that it's been done before.

Thanos easily subdued Lord Mar-Vell, which leads many to believe that Thanos may have gotten a physical upgrade without taking into account that he may have been able to do this before he was resurrected, but there is really no concrete evidence to support this notion. Oh and a dagger called the God Slayer broke on Thanos' skin which I guess is supposed to be more impressive than him surviving a black hole, even though the dagger lacks feats to rest on this idea.

Very astute post. You've saved me the effort of typing this up as proof that nothing Thanos did in TI puts him in any shape or form capable of contending with a being of FP Tyrant's level.

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
Very astute post. You've saved me the effort of typing this up as proof that nothing Thanos did in TI puts him in any shape or form capable of contending with a being of FP Tyrant's level.

Hey the over exaggeration is a bit too much. I for one have always thought of Thanos as a bad motherf@@@@@, but come on! He has never been invincible, and this gave him a certain amount of charm.

We all knew that he could mess with the best, but that he was always just a big fish in a little pond. There are simply characters out there that are leagues above him in power. Tyrant is one of them. In my opinion it's nothing to be ashamed of. I was impressed that he even survived the encounter.

Originally posted by Stoic
Hey the over exaggeration is a bit too much. I for one have always thought of Thanos as a bad motherf@@@@@, but come on! He has never been invincible, and this gave him a certain amount of charm.

We all knew that he could mess with the best, but that he was always just a big fish in a little pond. There are simply characters out there that are leagues above him in power. Tyrant is one of them. In my opinion it's nothing to be ashamed of. I was impressed that he even survived the encounter.

as am I. But to make a character more than he is is detracting from the character himself.

I would never argue that Galactus could take down Mad Jim Jaspers for example. That's just foolish and detracts from the character.

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
as am I. But to make a character more than he is is detracting from the character himself.

I would never argue that Galactus could take down Mad Jim Jaspers for example. That's just foolish and detracts from the character.

I see what you mean in one way but in another way Galactus has many things over Jaspers. I'm not arguing the point because I understand your meaning. Reality manipulation trumps pure power.