Originally posted by quanchi112
I oneposted you into defeat.
You are the most ridiculous person this entire board has to offer. You're an old member here, but it looks like most of the people here don't take you seriously at all.
Even some trolls from other boards treat you like a complete idiot.
I'm on this board for 2 or 3 weaks and I already realized how incredibly stupid you are.
So how dare you even posting something like that after your constant fails in the thread, where you "tried" to debate.
Seriously, everyone who thinks that Jim Hammond aka Human Torch can actually harm the Sentry should be punched multiple times in the face and it's a fact that you're the first on in the line.
Stop behaving ridiculous. You're ridiculous and pathetic. You are not funny, you're a huge failure.
And that all not because you seem to like Thanos too much. It's mainly because you're simply a stupid person, who probably sells burgers at Mc Donalds.
Just shut the **** up. Your stupidity and inability are making me so angry ...
Originally posted by Power Cosmic IIMagus didn't try to destroy Galactus anyway and it completely destroyed his entire body unlike Thanos. The cc wasn't enough it took three telepaths at this point to mindlock him. I see one cc as hurting Galactus far more than Thor who ran through his helmet even recently. One cc didn't really cause Thanos to even bleed.
Galactus has nothing to do with this. It's not even a relevant comparison since Magus had 5 fully functional, intact CC's and Starlord had 1 cracked, drained CC. He didn't attempt to kill Thanos and KO'd him with 1 blast. Drop this comparison because I'm not buying starlord's ghetto ass cosmic cube is equivalent to the top shelf wares that Magus was rolling with. 5>>>>1 (that's 4 arrows). No use continuing with this line of logic. 5 is larger than 1 all day, every day.
He had the necessary power to affect Galactus so why not Tyrant who is weaker than Galactus while Thanos himself has grown in power since their altercation. Manhandling Mar-vell proves a lot. He was nothing to Thanos.
Thanos does not have the damage output necessary to compromise Tyrant. If he does, I'm waiting for you to give me evidence from TI that confirms he has damage sufficient to put Tyrant down.Beating marvel with with his fists doesn't cut it.[/B]
A weakened Galactus was defeated by Thor's power yet a weakened Thanos showed Mar-vell was nothing in comparison to him.
He was invulnerable, showed cc resisting durability, broke god killing blades off his skin, dominated Mar-vell, and caused permanent death in the cancerverse. he was a lot more powerful.
And again, you have wild speculation that the most powerful thanos was was immediately after emerging from the cocoon.The point is irrelevant anyway since the OP never stipulated "Thanos as he was right after emerging from the cocoon."
His durability was breached by 1 bomb. That's a fact and you have no way of getting around that whatsoever. FP Tyrant shits a blast out and it's more powerful than that bomb, which obliterated Thanos. [/B]
Galactus was almost killed by one bomb Thanos rigged up. Thanos wanted him to survive as well. This was a weakened Thanos anyway and a weakened Galactus has been bested by far less than a cc and three telepaths while mindless.
Thanos clearly wins here.
L
Originally posted by EnzeruLooks like I struck a nerve. Listen I already won the debate and my responses are ready to go just wait until I submit them.
You are the most ridiculous person this entire board has to offer. You're an old member here, but it looks like most of the people here don't take you seriously at all.
Even some trolls from other boards treat you like a complete idiot.
I'm on this board for 2 or 3 weaks and I already realized how incredibly stupid you are.So how dare you even posting something like that after your constant fails in the thread, where you "tried" to debate.
Seriously, everyone who thinks that Jim Hammond aka Human Torch can actually harm the Sentry should be punched multiple times in the face and it's a fact that you're the first on in the line.Stop behaving ridiculous. You're ridiculous and pathetic. You are not funny, you're a huge failure.
And that all not because you seem to like Thanos too much. It's mainly because you're simply a stupid person, who probably sells burgers at Mc Donalds.Just shut the **** up. Your stupidity and inability are making me so angry ...
Also quit taking this stuff so personally it's just a comic book versus forum no reason to rage out.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I oneposted you into defeat. Lord Mar-vell.
Lord Mar-vell is Trans Tier at best...
Odin, Galactus, Full Power Tyrant (hell DP Tyrant for that matter), and many, many, others would defeat him with ease; geater ease than Thanos did...
Beating Lord Mar-vell is no indication of what Thanos could do to someone who is beyond a High Skyfather...
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderNo, he isn't. Hell, Thanos handled him better than Galactus handled a weakened Thanos the first time around.
Lord Mar-vell is Trans Tier at best...Odin, Galactus, Full Power Tyrant (hell DP Tyrant for that matter), and many, many, others would defeat him with ease; geater ease than Thanos did...
Beating Lord Mar-vell is no indication of what Thanos could do to someone who is beyond a High Skyfather...
Galactus depleted vital energies in breaking through just one shield. Thanos already showed while far weaker the ability to withstand the Tyrant's might and deck him to the ground.
Thanos is more durable and far more powerful. He wins.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he isn't. Hell, Thanos handled him better than Galactus handled a weakened Thanos the first time around.Galactus depleted vital energies in breaking through just one shield. Thanos already showed while far weaker the ability to withstand the Tyrant's might and deck him to the ground.
Thanos is more durable and far more powerful. He wins.
So Galactus used vital energies breaking the shield; we both are using vital energies typing these replies...true story.
You are taking that too far; Galactus had Thanos begging for his life and had to activate all his defensive shielding to merely survive Galactus's initial attack...Thanos is nothing to the Big-G.
Thanos is "far more powerful" than Tyrant based on what? Based on beating Lord Mar-vell??
Bah...your ignorance is infinite...
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderNo, I am not but I do agree you probably are. Galactus is weakened by his energy depletion more than any high end comisc character I can recall off hand so it showed how much energy was required to break through just one.
So Galactus used vital energies breaking the shield; we both are using vital energies typing these replies...true story.You are taking that too far; Galactus had Thanos begging for his life and had to activate all his defensive shielding to merely survive Galactus's initial attack...Thanos is nothing to the Big-G.
Thanos is "far more powerful" than Tyrant based on what? Based on beating Lord Mar-vell??
Bah...your ignorance is infinite...
I never argued for Thanos over Galactus until Thanos Imperative. As death's avatar Galactus can't win. He lacks the power of the cc for one imo and secondly Galactus will be too weakened just breaking through one shield to last much longer.
This isn't about Thanos' glory over Galactus it's about his glory over Tyrant.
Based off Thanos tanking a cc level power and not even bleeding, being able to cause permanent death to unkillables, and being immune to death. Thanos doesn't lose a single match.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Magus didn't try to destroy Galactus anyway and it completely destroyed his entire body unlike Thanos. The cc wasn't enough it took three telepaths at this point to mindlock him. I see one cc as hurting Galactus far more than Thor who ran through his helmet even recently. One cc didn't really cause Thanos to even bleed.
He had the necessary power to affect Galactus so why not Tyrant who is weaker than Galactus while Thanos himself has grown in power since their altercation. Manhandling Mar-vell proves a lot. He was nothing to Thanos. A weakened Galactus was defeated by Thor's power yet a weakened Thanos showed Mar-vell was nothing in comparison to him.
The CC is cracked and drained, you're trying to hard to extrapolate that the CC was fully functional and capable. Point is you have no way of supporting your implication that this was a CC operating at normal CC levels, which is CLEARLY not the case since Kang made that clear when he gave it to starlord, that the cube is sub-optimal. This isn't supporting your point at all.
He had the power to annoy Galactus. That is it. You can slap brock lesnar in the face and he will be greatly annoyed. By your logic, you then extrapolate that to mean you would beat him in a fist fight, even though you begged him (on your knees no less) to stop after he hit you with just 1 punch. Manhadling Mar-Vell proves a lot to herald levelers and trans tier. Nothing to skyfather an above level and if you think otherwise then you need to provide proof that Mar-Vell operates on a scale of FP Tyrant. You will find a complete lack of evidence to support such.
Thanos was killed by Drax twice. Thor has killed Galactus zero times.
He was invulnerable, showed cc resisting durability, broke god killing blades off his skin, dominated Mar-vell, and caused permanent death in the cancerverse. he was a lot more powerful.
He was invulnerable to bootleg avengers and the guardians of the galaxy, most of whom aren't herald level even. That is NOT impressive at all. Causing permanent death is irrelevant in this fight since he was granted that power by Death in order to be an extension of herself in a realm where her M-body and concept was killed. That's not relevant to this fight at all.
Galactus was almost killed by one bomb Thanos rigged up. Thanos wanted him to survive as well. This was a weakened Thanos anyway and a weakened Galactus has been bested by far less than a cc and three telepaths while mindless.Thanos clearly wins here.
Galactus had a "40%" chance of being killed by being sandwiched between 2 planets and the entire nuclear arsenal of the rigellians in the center after fighting a dimensional threat. A forty percent chance. That's less than half. Drax on the other hand, had a 100% chance of killing Thanos using a bomb that he hid in the pocket of his black leather pants while Thanos was musing about Titan. So yeah, there was no point at all in you making that comparison.
This isn't a weakened FP Tyrant so stop bring up "weakened Galactus." Why are you obsessed over someone who isn't in this fight. You are forced to use this "weakened" Thanos from TI since you yourself stated that you aren't debating using pre-TI thanos since he is "irrelevant."
Make up your mind. Are you using pre-TI thanos or "weakened" TI Thanos who also happened to be "powered up"
Originally posted by Power Cosmic IIIt was stated immediately afterwards he could have done ANYTHING with it. It also wasn't drained then since he used it at the end of the arc. per the norm the comic supports me not you. Yes, it is since far less has rocked Galactus including Thanos' power or Thor hammering through his helmet.
The CC is cracked and drained, you're trying to hard to extrapolate that the CC was fully functional and capable. Point is you have no way of supporting your implication that this was a CC operating at normal CC levels, which is CLEARLY not the case since Kang made that clear when he gave it to starlord, that the cube is sub-optimal. This isn't supporting your point at all.
Thanos didn't slap anyone he sent him a few football fields in distance. That's more than slapping someone. 😂Mar-vell was on a level far above trans tier it's just a category I mean even Zeus himself has struggled with elite top tiers not Mar-vell he looked at one as a minor annoyance. Get back to me when Zeus can put down a Thor level character easily and not while weakened. I didn't say Mar-vell operates at a level above Tyrant I said Thanos operates on a much more formidable level.
He had the power to annoy Galactus. That is it. You can slap brock lesnar in the face and he will be greatly annoyed. By your logic, you then extrapolate that to mean you would beat him in a fist fight, even though you begged him (on your knees no less) to stop after he hit you with just 1 punch. Manhadling Mar-Vell proves a lot to herald levelers and trans tier. Nothing to skyfather an above level and if you think otherwise then you need to provide proof that Mar-Vell operates on a scale of FP Tyrant. You will find a complete lack of evidence to support such.Thanos was killed by Drax twice. Thor has killed Galactus zero times.[/B]
Thanos had his back turned. Thanos was weakened and not killed since he's immune to death but his body was destroyed by an antimatter bomb which served as a plot device outside his range of powers thus inapplicable. Might as well use the Stark satellite as legitimate evidence as to what defeated WB Hulk. 🙂
Yes, it is relevant since he still possesses those powers until he's seen without them. He was her avatar his actions mattered. It's like saying Surfer's powers don't count because he's serving Galactus it's ridiculous and desperation because I argue based off comics you don't.
He was invulnerable to bootleg avengers and the guardians of the galaxy, most of whom aren't herald level even. That is NOT impressive at all. Causing permanent death is irrelevant in this fight since he was granted that power by Death in order to be an extension of herself in a realm where her M-body and concept was killed. That's not relevant to this fight at all.Galactus had a "40%" chance of being killed by being sandwiched between 2 planets and the entire nuclear arsenal of the rigellians in the center after fighting a dimensional threat. A forty percent chance. That's less than half. Drax on the other hand, had a 100% chance of killing Thanos using a bomb that he hid in the pocket of his black leather pants while Thanos was musing about Titan. So yeah, there was no point at all in you making that comparison.[/B]
Yes, Thanos calculated the odds and his goal wasn't to destroy Galactus anyway. Thanos was weakened and both served as plot devices.
This isn't a weakened Thanos either if you bring in weakened Thanos showings I will do the same to Galactus and he's got a million of em so you know anyway you choose to play it I win.
This isn't a weakened FP Tyrant so stop bring up "weakened Galactus." Why are you obsessed over someone who isn't in this fight. You are forced to use this "weakened" Thanos from TI since you yourself stated that you aren't debating using pre-TI thanos since he is "irrelevant."Make up your mind. Are you using pre-TI thanos or "weakened" TI Thanos who also happened to be "powered up" [/B]
Thanos is at full strength pre Thanos Imperative but everything he accomplishes in the main book is while weakened so it's fair game as feats. We don't eliminate Galactus feats while he's weakened I mean come on apply the same logic to all characters like I do.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It was stated immediately afterwards he could have done ANYTHING with it. It also wasn't drained then since he used it at the end of the arc. per the norm the comic supports me not you. Yes, it is since far less has rocked Galactus including Thanos' power or Thor hammering through his helmet.
GAMORA mused that he could have done anything with it and she was talking out of her ass since Starlord again confirmed at the end of TI that the CC was on its last legs. Kang never told Gamora the state of the Cube.
Thanos didn't slap anyone he sent him a few football fields in distance. That's more than slapping someone.Do I need to show you the scan that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the blast did absolutely nothing consequentially? It boggles me why you continue to bring this up when what followed affected Thanos far, far, far more than what Thanos did to Galactus. Thanos was almost KILLED. Meanwhile, Galactus was annoyed. I don't know how your logic works, but I would infinitely rather be annoyed than on the brink of annihilation begging for my life. Again, stop bringing up the Galactus encounter because all that resulted in was Thanos begging for his life on his knees for the first time in any single appearance to stave of just a SECOND blast from Galactus. In this fight, imagine if Tyrant blasted him 4 times. Just four. Are you trying to beat your self with your own logic? The whole ordeal was written by Jim Starlin, no less.
😂Mar-vell was on a level far above trans tier it's just a category I mean even Zeus himself has struggled with elite top tiers not Mar-vell he looked at one as a minor annoyance. Get back to me when Zeus can put down a Thor level character easily and not while weakened. I didn't say Mar-vell operates at a level above Tyrant I said Thanos operates on a much more formidable level.Then you have an absolute lack of evidence that proves Thanos operates at a level above Tyrant, since you already admitted that in your post above.
Thanos had his back turned. Thanos was weakened and not killed since he's immune to death but his body was destroyed by an antimatter bomb which served as a plot device outside his range of powers thus inapplicable. Might as well use the Stark satellite as legitimate evidence as to what defeated WB Hulk. 🙂Except WB Hulk wasn't KILLED. You're mad that Drax killed Thanos twice, deal with it. FP Tyrant exceeds the blast of that 1 bomb and he kills Thanos.
Unless you want to prove to my that FP Tyrant has insufficient blast output to equate that bomb. Go ahead...I will wait.
Yes, it is relevant since he still possesses those powers until he's seen without them. He was her avatar his actions mattered. It's like saying Surfer's powers don't count because he's serving Galactus it's ridiculous and desperation because I argue based off comics you don't.
No.
You clearly cannot comprehend my logic and thus default to a defensive position which is typical of your posts. Bringing death to a universe that lacks the concept is Thanos' power. That is it.
An amp in durability is suspect at the absolute best since he was taken down by a bomb, rendered impotent by Rocket Racoon's gun, and knocked down with 1 blast from a nearly spent cosmic cube. That's 3 specific, distinct references in regards to his durability. Granted he was weakened in rocket racoon's gun situation but you stipulated that you are using TI Thanos.
His blasting power isn't augmented as you fallaciously claim. And even if it were, the prove, since you "argue off of comics" that his blasting power is sufficient to overwhelm and defeat a being on FP Tyrant's level.
Because Tyrant is not from the cancerverse and any special powers Death gave to thanos to kill beings that do not die? IRRELEVANT since Tyrant is not from the cancerverse and is ALREADY in a universe under Death's jurisdiction. Do you understand now? Good.
Yes, Thanos calculated the odds and his goal wasn't to destroy Galactus anyway. Thanos was weakened and both served as plot devices.
This isn't a weakened Thanos either if you bring in weakened Thanos showings I will do the same to Galactus and he's got a million of em so you know anyway you choose to play it I win.
[b]Thanos is at full strength pre Thanos Imperative but everything he accomplishes in the main book is while weakened so it's fair game as feats. We don't eliminate Galactus feats while he's weakened I mean come on apply the same logic to all characters like I do.
Dude, you are rife with indecision. You argued that Thanos was weak in TI. Now you argue this isn't a weakened Thanos. But you argue that pre-TI Thanos is irrelevant since he got a "power upgrade" in TI and that "everything he accomplished in the main book is while weakened so it's fair game as feats."
MAKE UP YOUR DAMN MIND. You either choose to use pre-TI thanos, or you choose to use TI thanos, in which case, going by your own argument, TI Thanos was weakened and thus in order to argue against me you have to use pre-TI Thanos feats, all of which you yourself labeled as irrelevant since TI Thanos received a power up.
Oh...and you are clearly faltering here since you repeatedly seem to think this is a Galactus vs. Thanos thread. If you feel that strongly about converting this into G vs. Thanos then let's go to the BZ, alright?
Originally posted by Power Cosmic IIGamora's words were clear. You can ignore what you want to I am used to it by now but don't insult my intelligence I only argue based on what I have read. Starlord used the cc at the end of the arc further explosing your half truth that it was out of juice after the Thanos blast. The blast knocked him a few hundred yards. I didn't say it almost defeated him I said it obviously affected him judging by the distance he flew in the air. Pay attention to what I am saying not what you think I am saying. Jim Starlin doesn't write a high end Thanos in terms of power with regards to other writer. Starlin tends to have Thanos outwitting and plays up his intelligence more so than pure power.
GAMORA mused that he could have done anything with it and she was talking out of her ass since Starlord again confirmed at the end of TI that the CC was on its last legs. Kang never told Gamora the state of the Cube.Do I need to show you the scan that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the blast did absolutely nothing consequentially? It boggles me why you continue to bring this up when what followed affected Thanos far, far, far more than what Thanos did to Galactus. Thanos was almost KILLED. Meanwhile, Galactus was annoyed. I don't know how your logic works, but I would infinitely rather be annoyed than on the brink of annihilation begging for my life. Again, stop bringing up the Galactus encounter because all that resulted in was Thanos begging for his life on his knees for the first time in any single appearance to stave of just a SECOND blast from Galactus. In this fight, imagine if Tyrant blasted him 4 times. [b]Just four
. Are you trying to beat your self with your own logic? The whole ordeal was written by Jim Starlin, no less. [/B]
I have my opinion which shows Thanos preupgrade can affect someone more powerful than Tyrant who already defeated Tyrant. WB was depowered. The satellite served as a plot device just as the bomb try and keep up with the logic not what the writer deemed necessary for both plot devices. Try and keep up.
Then you have an absolute lack of evidence that proves Thanos operates at a level above Tyrant, since you already admitted that in your post above.Except WB Hulk wasn't KILLED. You're mad that Drax killed Thanos twice, deal with it. FP Tyrant exceeds the blast of that 1 bomb and he kills Thanos. [/B]
That was a weakened Thanos and he doesn't have access to the bomb. Try and keep up. Yes.
Unless you want to prove to my that FP Tyrant has insufficient blast output to equate that bomb. Go ahead...I will wait.No.
You clearly cannot comprehend my logic and thus default to a defensive position which is typical of your posts. Bringing death to a universe that lacks the concept is Thanos' power. That is it.
[/B]
You clearly have no understanding what I even mean yet continue to rage against it all the same.
He didn't move against gunfire until he was weakened in the Thanos Imperative arc. Aren't you getting what I am saying ? It's like you have short term memory loss or something. Thanos was weakened during T1 but was returning to full power as the arc progressed.
An amp in durability is suspect at the absolute best since he was taken down by a bomb, rendered impotent by Rocket Racoon's gun, and knocked down with 1 blast from a nearly spent cosmic cube. That's 3 specific, distinct references in regards to his durability. Granted he was weakened in rocket racoon's gun situation but you stipulated that you are using TI Thanos.His blasting power isn't augmented as you fallaciously claim. And even if it were, the prove, since you "argue off of comics" that his blasting power is sufficient to overwhelm and defeat a being on FP Tyrant's level. [/B]
Because Tyrant is not from the cancerverse and any special powers Death gave to thanos to kill beings that do not die? IRRELEVANT since Tyrant is not from the cancerverse and is ALREADY in a universe under Death's jurisdiction. Do you understand now? Good.
Thanos in gotg 25 wasn't weakened. In T1 it was stated he was returning to full power as the arc progressed it's all stated on panel. Yes, we still use weakened feats but with the context they were weakened while accomplishing them. Are you new here ?
Dude, you are rife with indecision. You argued that Thanos was weak in TI. Now you argue this isn't a weakened Thanos. But you argue that pre-TI Thanos is irrelevant since he got a "power upgrade" in TI and that "everything he accomplished in the main book is while weakened so it's fair game as feats."MAKE UP YOUR DAMN MIND. You either choose to use pre-TI thanos, or you choose to use TI thanos, in which case, going by your own argument, TI Thanos was weakened and thus in order to argue against me you have to use pre-TI Thanos feats, all of which you yourself labeled as irrelevant since TI Thanos received a power up.
Oh...and you are clearly faltering here since you repeatedly seem to think this is a Galactus vs. Thanos thread. If you feel that strongly about converting this into G vs. Thanos then let's go to the BZ, alright? [/B]
Thanos wins. Too powerful, able to withstand cc blasts, etc. Tyrant simply can't win. Quit bringing up a battlezone I'd destroy you but haven't the time. Get some experience, pleas.e
Originally posted by quanchi112
Gamora's words were clear. You can ignore what you want to I am used to it by now but don't insult my intelligence I only argue based on what I have read. Starlord used the cc at the end of the arc further explosing your half truth that it was out of juice after the Thanos blast.
You have failed to comprehend again that the Cube is not at optimal levels. Gamora's statements<<<Starlord's statements and Kang's. Get with the program. It's not that hard to read.
The blast knocked him a few hundred yards. I didn't say it almost defeated him I said it obviously affected him judging by the distance he flew in the air. Pay attention to what I am saying not what you think I am saying. Jim Starlin doesn't write a high end Thanos in terms of power with regards to other writer. Starlin tends to have Thanos outwitting and plays up his intelligence more so than pure power.
And this has zero relevance whatsoever to this thread. Effecting FP Tyrant is a far cry from administering 1 blast and Thanos' defenses are all but breached in entirety. Do you think Thanos will win by merely "effecting" FP Tyrant? A worm can slither up your pants and you'd be effected. Don't dare argue that the worm would go on to somehow knock you out or even kill you. Galactus humiliated thanos with 1 shot while Thanos managed to make Galactus angry. Thanos tries that same blast on FP Tyrant, he will atomize thanos in retaliation. Do I need to post scans of DP Tyrant tanking Thanos' blasts again and again? Do I need to?
I have my opinion which shows Thanos preupgrade can affect someone more powerful than Tyrant who already defeated Tyrant. WB was depowered. The satellite served as a plot device just as the bomb try and keep up with the logic not what the writer deemed necessary for both plot devices. Try and keep up.
Your comparison, once again, is inadequate and illogical. You're complaining that Drax used a device which breached Thanos' durability. It's CANON and showed that Thanos is susceptible to a certain degree of damage inflicted on his person. The sooner you accept this instead of arbitrarily dismissing the feat since it was a plot device the sooner you can keep up. That scene is never going away no matter how much you try to ignore it and Tyrant has never been brought down by anything less than a Galactus operating at levels where collateral damage was effecting galaxies, and not simply lobbing guys a mere football field away to no effect, which is the most Thanos has displayed in relation to Galactus. I just put down 2 of your points in 1 sentence. Keep up, it's too easy.
That was a weakened Thanos and he doesn't have access to the bomb. Try and keep up. Yes.Yeah, FP Tyrant doesn't have access to a bomb. Like that is going to prevent him from making Thanos his *****.
You clearly have no understanding what I even mean yet continue to rage against it all the same.Actually, it's YOU who have no understanding of what YOU are arguing. Thanos' death "amp" has no relevance, NONE, whatsoever to this battle. His "amp" works against beings who are from a universe that lack death. His "amp" is not a raw increase in his personal power. Disagree with me? Prove it. I want scans. Evidence. Show me where it says something to the effect that "mistress death has granted me far greater power than i've had before. i can kill beings i would never be able to hurt before" You state you use comics. Use them now. I'm still waiting.
He didn't move against gunfire until he was weakened in the Thanos Imperative arc. Aren't you getting what I am saying ? It's like you have short term memory loss or something. Thanos was weakened during T1 but was returning to full power as the arc progressed.
Anyway. Full power as the arc progressed. Good. Now we have progress. Tell me, at his "full power" who was the most powerful being he defeated? What was his most impressive showing at "full power?"
You didn't answer this.
Because Tyrant is not from the cancerverse and any special powers Death gave to thanos to kill beings that do not die? IRRELEVANT since Tyrant is not from the cancerverse and is ALREADY in a universe under Death's jurisdiction. Do you understand now? Good.
Thanos in gotg 25 wasn't weakened. In T1 it was stated he was returning to full power as the arc progressed it's all stated on panel. Yes, we still use weakened feats but with the context they were weakened while accomplishing them. Are you new here ?So thanos in gotg 25, were starlord blasts him with a drained and sub-optimal cc, wasn't weakened. So he gathered his strength and power as TI progressed.
And then drax killed him with a bomb. Thanos that drax killed with a bomb>>>thanos that starlord blasted with a depleted CC. I was leading you to this conclusion the whole time. Why do you make it so easy.
Thanos wins. Too powerful, able to withstand cc blasts, etc. Tyrant simply can't win. Quit bringing up a battlezone I'd destroy you but haven't the time. Get some experience, pleas.e
Too powerful? Are you inept at simple relative comparisons? What has he done that renders him too powerful besides wiping out clones of namor and hulk?
You would never win a Thanos vs. Galactus anything, much less a bz. I can't even say you made a nice dodge. You ran the instant I brought it up. But that's what Thanos did against Tyrant anyway, and as you put your heels to the ground and make a bee-line out of this thread, remember that you emulated Thanos at his worst, and fled like a scolded dog.
Originally posted by Power Cosmic IIThe cube was still all powerful and capable of anything at that time. Starlord was incorrect about it having one last blast ie. last issue of Thanos Imperative.
You have failed to comprehend again that the Cube is not at optimal levels. Gamora's statements<<<Starlord's statements and Kang's. Get with the program. It's not that hard to read.
So affecting someone more powerful than Tyrant has zero relevance. Interesting. Thanos is a LOT more powerful since the time of the Galactus encounter along with being able to resist cc power. A worm can't knock me back 50 feet. Horrible analogy. It's completely distasteful and asinine. I don't think Tyrant is more powerful than a cc that failed to atomize him. You are just throwing basless claims out there at this point.
And this has zero relevance whatsoever to this thread. Effecting FP Tyrant is a far cry from administering 1 blast and Thanos' defenses are all but breached in entirety. Do you think Thanos will win by merely "effecting" FP Tyrant? A worm can slither up your pants and you'd be effected. Don't dare argue that the worm would go on to somehow knock you out or even kill you. Galactus humiliated thanos with 1 shot while Thanos managed to make Galactus angry. Thanos tries that same blast on FP Tyrant, he will atomize thanos in retaliation. Do I need to post scans of DP Tyrant tanking Thanos' blasts again and again? Do I need to?[/B]
Thanos was weakened thus inapplicable to a fully powered Thanos. 🙂 The plot device isn't in this thread anyway. We've seen plot devices affect Galactus and WB Hulk but they aren't usable or considered standard gear nor does this showing apply to a fully empowered Thanos of Titan. I am going to town on your logic. Tyrant was brought down by a Thanos punch if you want to bring up things that brought him down. Tyrant was also depowered since you don't care if Thanos was or wasn't. Unlike Thanos Tyrant cannot reform after complete destruction. 🙂
Your comparison, once again, is inadequate and illogical. You're complaining that Drax used a device which breached Thanos' durability. It's CANON and showed that Thanos is susceptible to a certain degree of damage inflicted on his person. The sooner you accept this instead of arbitrarily dismissing the feat since it was a plot device the sooner you can keep up. That scene is never going away no matter how much you try to ignore it and Tyrant has never been brought down by anything less than a Galactus operating at levels where collateral damage was effecting galaxies, and not simply lobbing guys a mere football field away to no effect, which is the most Thanos has displayed in relation to Galactus. I just put down 2 of your points in 1 sentence. Keep up, it's too easy.[/B]
Thanos was weakened which doesn't apply to him since we don't use weakened versions unless stated in the op.
Yeah, FP Tyrant doesn't have access to a bomb. Like that is going to prevent him from making Thanos his *****.[/B]
His amp doesn't just work against cancerverse beings. He isn't just immune to death against them he was in general. He didn't like that at the end of the comic hence him raging out. Did you even read or skim it at least ?
Actually, it's YOU who have no understanding of what YOU are arguing. Thanos' death "amp" has no relevance, NONE, whatsoever to this battle. His "amp" works against beings who are from a universe that lack death. His "amp" is not a raw increase in his personal power. Disagree with me? Prove it. I want scans. Evidence. Show me where it says something to the effect that "mistress death has granted me far greater power than i've had before. i can kill beings i would never be able to hurt before" You state you use comics. Use them now. I'm still waiting.[/B]
Look at him easily dominating a character who easily slapped aside the Surfer like an afterthought. Thanos easily wrecked someone who was easily above the Surfer. That's an amp, bro. I won't ignore him having the power to kill unkillables as the AOD. You want to ignore dialogue, canon showings, and the context of the whole book to sell your weak case. Not on my watch. I am arguing for the sake of internet justice.
Weakened. Does not apply. He's also immune to death.
LOL. I'm not even going to bother putting up the scan where a child gamora saves thanos from death by a random thug who fired 1 shot. Thanos even states to himself that she saved his life.[/B]
He was ko'd by three telepaths and a cc. We didn't get to see him take on much of anyone at full power. A cc didn't even cause an ounce of blood so his durability is through the roof. We did see him at less than full power dominate Mar-vell and lull him into a false sense of security. That's why he's co crazy powerful he's practically undebatable. Tyrant and most others don't stand a chance.
Anyway. Full power as the arc progressed. Good. Now we have progress. Tell me, at his "full power" who was the most powerful being he defeated? What was his most impressive showing at "full power?"You didn't answer this.[/B]
Yes, he was getting stronger as the arc progressed but not at full power. Even at his weakest he had enough power to kill unkillables.
So thanos in gotg 25, were starlord blasts him with a drained and sub-optimal cc, wasn't weakened. So he gathered his strength and power as TI progressed.And then drax killed him with a bomb. Thanos that drax killed with a bomb>>>thanos that starlord blasted with a depleted CC. I was leading you to this conclusion the whole time. Why do you make it so easy.
[/B]
Drax used a plot device bomb outside these threads to attack Thanos with which didn't even defeat him since he's immune to death. The cc power which didn't even lead him to bleed is crazy powerful. I recall Galactus being completely destroyed by cc's.
Manhandling Mar-vell. Do you not read my posts or pretend I haven't already addressed this. Look at this point say you're wrong and I will let you leave without anything further.
Too powerful? Are you inept at simple relative comparisons? What has he done that renders him too powerful besides wiping out clones of namor and hulk?You would never win a Thanos vs. Galactus anything, much less a bz. I can't even say you made a nice dodge. You ran the instant I brought it up. But that's what Thanos did against Tyrant anyway, and as you put your heels to the ground and make a bee-line out of this thread, remember that you emulated Thanos at his worst, and fled like a scolded dog. [/B]
I have already done 2 battlezones do one on your own or create the thread. If you want to argue it create the thread this whole challenging posters out of emotional pain needs to stop.
Thanos won their first confrontation. He took the orb and withstood his might so according to him and the objective he set before him he won.