Hulk vs Thor

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Hulk powered through his skin being flayed from his bones. He repelled reality itself, but he didn't reality warp Hulk himself. Don't try to use that showing to argue Hulk could endure a warp from someone like Scarlet Witch or something.

Unless you think the damage from Vector >>>> anything Thor could ever produce. Which is, lol, mistaken to say the least.

Read the scan Jake.

Originally posted by carver9
Read the scan Jake.

I did.

And it's impressive and I'm taking nothing away from Hulk, which is the exact opposite of your rampant lowballing of Thor and his offensive capabilities.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
I did.

And it's impressive and I'm taking nothing away from Hulk, which is the exact opposite of your rampant lowballing of Thor and his offensive capabilities.

Im not saying anything against Thor output...I'm talking about Hulks durability.

Originally posted by carver9
Im not saying anything against Thor output...I'm talking about Hulks durability.

How does that feat suggest he'd tank anything Thor throws at him?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
How does that feat suggest he'd tank anything Thor throws at him?

Well that was a far inferior Hulk with lower durability stats than HOTM Hulk. Feats say that he may be able to power through many of Thor's more exotic attacks. Vector is also one of the guys that put Thor down during Siege. It's worth giving it a benefit of the doubt.

Originally posted by TheHulk
Yea the savage Hulk

Just means that Thor will have to use a more powerful lighnting strike and/or hit the Hulk more than once, neither of which should be a problem.

Originally posted by Stoic
Well that was a far inferior Hulk with lower durability stats than HOTM Hulk. Feats say that he may be able to power through many of Thor's more exotic attacks. Vector is also one of the guys that put Thor down during Siege. It's worth giving it a benefit of the doubt.

I understand that.

The people who didn't power through Thor's more exotic attacks also give credence to the idea that Thor can put him down. Vector + the U-Foes + the Dark Avengers + Random villains put Thor down after a sneak attack from Sentry, true. Conversely, Thor's waded through attacks from an insane Odin and Celestials bombarding him. And Thor's also beaten the U-Foes before with a convincing level of ease.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
I understand that.

The people who didn't power through Thor's more exotic attacks also give credence to the idea that Thor can put him down. Vector + the U-Foes + the Dark Avengers + Random villains put Thor down after a sneak attack from Sentry, true. Conversely, Thor's waded through attacks from an insane Odin and Celestials bombarding him. And Thor's also beaten the U-Foes before with a convincing level of ease.

When do we decide on dismissing ass crazy feats that far outstrip the norm (Yes even a CISless Thor) and go with a median? I'm not sure if you are willing to agree with me, but the power that put Thor on his kiester during Siege was far less power than the Hulk exhibited during the HOTM story line, even with the sneak attack from Sentry included. Based on that poor and yes low showing of Thor, it would be easy to conclude that the very power leaking off of Betty and the Hulk would have been more than enough to KO or do worse to Thor. Not sure if your willing to see it in this light.

That scan and the context of it said that Vector was pouring out some heavy power capable of repelling reality itself. It never said that it was warping reality, but more to the tone of moving everything in reality. This is why the Hulk may be able to power through even a huge storm that Thor can produce, even with CIS off. That as we all know was written to be a far inferior version of the Hulk than the one that the OP has placed in this thread.

If Thor's high feats don't count, then the Hulk's high feats don't count either.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If Thor's high feats don't count, then the Hulk's high feats don't count either.

That wasn't even approaching the point that I was trying to convey. Are you under the impression that Thor would open up with a volley and steamroll the Hulk, when on panel evidence clearly shows that even with all of the destruction caused during HOTM, that he was barely hurt?

The energy that was displayed during HOTM was so great that it is not implausible to think that the Huk could resist Thor's fiercest attacks, and get in a few of his own. Anyone saying that this is one sided is ignoring the Hulk's past durability feats, and just plain out low balling the character.

According to the OP, CIS is off and they're using everything they have to win, given Thor's powerset and his power-level....the Hulk doesn't have much of a chance.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
No, I'm not. I fully acknowledge what happened in the feat and what Hulk endured.

I'm not delusional enough to think that Vector's power output shits on anything Thor is capable of, because it's not.

And Thor's endured blasts from Skyfathers on up, so...

I think it's a case that for all Hulk's high feats (which are no doubt impressive), Thor has just as many feats that are that insanely f*cked up impressive, and people tend to forget that.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I think it's a case that for all Hulk's high feats (which are no doubt impressive), Thor has just as many feats that are that insanely f*cked up impressive, and people tend to forget that.

Originally posted by TheHulk
I agree Thor has somewhat better fts but that should not decide the fight

it won't decide the fight, but it does illustrate the point that for all Hulk's high showings, someone like Thor is going to be able to damage him.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I think it's a case that for all Hulk's high feats (which are no doubt impressive), Thor has just as many feats that are that insanely f*cked up impressive, and people tend to forget that.

whereas alot of thor's impressive feats are very old and not relevant

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just means that Thor will have to use a more powerful lighnting strike and/or hit the Hulk more than once, neither of which should be a problem.

Originally posted by -Pr-
it won't decide the fight, but it does illustrate the point that for all Hulk's high showings, someone like Thor is going to be able to damage him.

Originally posted by Starscream M
you know what though, hulk's impressive feats are more recent and on an upward trend

whereas alot of thor's impressive feats are very old and not relevant

If the feats apply to current Thor, they are very relevant.

Originally posted by Starscream M
you know what though, hulk's impressive feats are more recent and on an upward trend

whereas alot of thor's impressive feats are very old and not relevant

That's not true.

And in the end it doesn't matter as the OP stated "Classic" Thor. Classic and Current Thor are the same guy power level wise with Classic Thor having a wider array of random ass broken powers he pulled out of nowhere and Current Thor being a more aggressive bastard.