Hulk vs Thor

Started by TheHulk41 pages
TheHulk Retired Debater

Originally posted by Starscream M
you know what though, hulk's impressive feats are more recent and on an upward trend

whereas alot of thor's impressive feats are very old and not relevant

agreeable...i guess but still stupid.

Silent Master Senior Member

Originally posted by Starscream M
you know what though, hulk's impressive feats are more recent and on an upward trend

whereas alot of thor's impressive feats are very old and not relevant

Why wouldn't Thor's feats be relevant?

TheHulk Retired Debater

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
That's not true.

And in the end it doesn't matter as the OP stated "Classic" Thor.

Yep Classic Thor who was stated to be at 95 tons but we don't use handbook lucky for u or it will would have sh*ted on ur agrument

TheHulk Retired Debater

Originally posted by Silent Master
Why wouldn't Thor's feats be relevant?
Cause their old while HOTM Hulk is new and prob will never be seen again...

JakeTheBank Return of the King
Originally posted by TheHulk
Yep Classic Thor who was stated to be at 95 tons but we don't use handbook lucky for u or it will would have sh*ted on ur agrument

We don't use handbooks period as they're often wrong as hell.

Classic Thor moved a million tons with ease on panel when he was depicted by Lee/Kirby, which is as "classic" as it gets.

Silent Master Senior Member
Originally posted by TheHulk
Cause their old while HOTM Hulk is new and prob will never be seen again...

IOW, because you don't want them to be relevant.

TheHulk Retired Debater

Originally posted by Silent Master
IOW, because you don't want them to be relevant.
No...I actually want it to be relevant cause their won't be a debate than fool.

TheHulk Retired Debater

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
We don't use handbooks period as they're often wrong as hell.

Classic Thor moved a million tons with ease on panel when he was depicted by Lee/Kirby, which is as "classic" as it gets.

lol you do know writers can write sh*t sometimes

Starscream M Senior Member

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
We don't use handbooks period as they're often wrong as hell.

Classic Thor moved a million tons with ease on panel when he was depicted by Lee/Kirby, which is as "classic" as it gets.

classic isn't current jake. we go by current.

JakeTheBank Return of the King
Originally posted by TheHulk
lol you do know writers can write sh*t sometimes

You do know who Stan Lee and Jack Kirby are, right?

Silent Master Senior Member
Originally posted by TheHulk
No...I actually want it to be relevant cause their won't be a debate than fool.

Really?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Why wouldn't Thor's feats be relevant?

Originally posted by TheHulk
Cause their old while HOTM Hulk is new and prob will never be seen again...

Try again.

JakeTheBank Return of the King
Originally posted by Starscream M
classic isn't current jake. we go by current.

Current Thor is every bit as powerful and as strong as Classic Thor.

Point is moot anyway as OP specified Classic Thor.

Damborgson King of the Damboys

Originally posted by carver9
I can do the same thing. At a much weaker state, WWH thunderclap koed Rulk. This thunderclap that ripped through a dimensional barrier...a thunderclap that is generated from a FAR more powerful Hulk should outright blow Thor insides out.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/34/69248890.jpg/

Yet Fing Fang Foom was fine? That feat isn't very good at at all. Nothing compared to Thor's that tore trhough CK. Foom was alive and well. He just hit the barrier with force enough to break it.

TheHulk Retired Debater

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
You do know who Stan Lee and Jack Kirby are, right?
i said Writers not the The One Above All... 😉

Silent Master Senior Member
Originally posted by Starscream M
classic isn't current jake. we go by current.

Unless the thread starter says otherwise and guess what....the OP says Classic Thor

TheHulk Retired Debater

Originally posted by Damborgson
Yet Fing Fang Foom was fine? That feat isn't very good at at all. Nothing compared to Thor's that tore trhough CK. Foom was alive and well. He just hit the barrier with force enough to break it.
Really show us???

TheHulk Retired Debater

Originally posted by Silent Master
Unless the thread starter says otherwise and guess what....the OP says [b]Classic Thor [/B]
oh you think

Stoic Avenger
Originally posted by -Pr-
it won't decide the fight, but it does illustrate the point that for all Hulk's high showings, someone like Thor is going to be able to damage him.

See you nailed it right on the head. Yes Thor can damage the Hulk, but blatantly saying things like the Hulk won't be able to mount an offense because he would never be able to overcome the storms that Thor whips up, the lightning arcs, anti force bolts, or the God blast is simply or should i say, blatantly disregarding the Hulk's past capabilities of resisting forces that could have been just as great, or even greater. Carver's posting of Vector and his reality repelling feat is a very strong argument, and shouldn't be discounted.

Damborgson King of the Damboys

Originally posted by carver9
Hyperbole. I feel pretty much safe at saying Hulk could thunder clap those winds out with ease.
It's not Hyperbole cuz hulk can't take it. 🙂 And you've got nothing that points to it being hyperbole other than hulk losing by it. And the wind and force generated by a thunderclap would just be given to Thor's control.

Damborgson King of the Damboys

Originally posted by TheHulk
Really show us???
show you what?