Morlun vs. Rulk

Started by byrdgang215 pages

Morlun vs. Rulk

Who wins?

No idea.

I am leaning towards Morlun however.

Morlun that fought Spiderman would get utterly destroyed by Red Hulk. And even if we took Morlun from blakc panther issue, he still likely get beat down.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Morlun that fought Spiderman would get utterly destroyed by Red Hulk. And even if we took Morlun from blakc panther issue, he still likely get beat down.

You forget Morlun has the power to absorb life force.

It only takes one touch, and since Rulk likes to walk around half naked...

How tough is secondary adamantium?

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Morlun that fought Spiderman would get utterly destroyed by Red Hulk. And even if we took Morlun from blakc panther issue, he still likely get beat down.
Dum Dum, you say it like they are two seperate characters. Morlun toyed with Spider-man and Pete's attacks were useless. Later we learnt he's not only too durable for class 20 attack but too durable for 100 vibranium missiles. And tbh I don't see Rulk dish out that much damage.

Originally posted by SamZED
Dum Dum, you say it like they are two seperate characters. Morlun toyed with Spider-man and Pete's attacks were useless. Later we learnt he's not only too durable for class 20 attack but too durable for 100 vibranium missiles. And tbh I don't see Rulk dish out that much damage.

Because they basically are two different characters. Morlun that fought spiderman was significantly less powerful. they gave him a big boost. If he fought Rulk at the level he was when he foguht Spiderman he get beasted. There be little he could do. However since his boost in power the fight a lot more interesting. (yes I undertsand there the same character but it very clear he was not originally intended to possess the level of power he did in black panther issue in contrast with his spiderman apaearances. Similar to how sabre-tooth classic is the same character technically, buthave very different levels of power. Same goes for numerous other characters)

I am not that impressed by vibranium missles and I think Rulk could in a single bunch exceed that out put.

Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
You forget Morlun has the power to absorb life force.

It only takes one touch, and since Rulk likes to walk around half naked...

It takes far more then one touch. his powers dont work instantly like your pretending. you know how many characters have life drain? if that was the end all be all. Omega red would be a friggin god.

I don't know if Morlun was really upgraded. Mabye a bit, but not that much.

Personally I think he can not be killed using brute force or conventional weapons, Wakandian weapons or no Wakandian weapons. He's a mystical, magical creature, they follow their own rules.

I don't know how many touches it will take to drain someone like Rulk. One ? Two ? Three ? Who knows. Maybe we'll find out some day.

Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
I don't know if Morlun was really upgraded. Mabye a bit, but not that much.

maybe a bit? are you kidding me? now your just plain being ignorant. If you compare his fights with spiderman and his apearances in black panther the power level difference is vast. If you honestly can't see that I feel sorry for you.

They reconnt him being vastly more powerful. So he is now more powerful but to pretend morlun display nearly the same level as power in his spiderman fight as he did in the black panther fight is absurdity.

Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
Personally I think he can not be killed using brute force or conventional weapons, Wakandian weapons or no Wakandian weapons. He's a mystical, magical creature, they follow their own rules.

first being unkilliable does not make u unbeatable

Second that is the lamest arguement I have ever heard. he magical so umm.....he can't be beat because umm..magic uhhh play by it own rules......

Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
I don't know how many touches it will take to drain someone like Rulk. One ? Two ? Three ? Who knows. Maybe we'll find out some day.

are you kidding me?

You have not even read the spiderman issues that much is clear because ur literally spiting on your own arguements.

Originally posted by carver9
How tough is secondary adamantium?
under busiek secondary.admantium ultrons were only breaking under thors best blows. So pretty tough

Morlun breaks him like primary adamantium

Originally posted by Damborgson
under busiek secondary.admantium ultrons were only breaking under thors best blows. So pretty tough

It deff strong. But it does fluctuate. Depends really on the object the secondary adamatium is made into and the amount. But deff need to be dam strong to break it.

This Morlun?!

Screw the "secondary" Adamantium ripping feat (assuming it was secondary in the first place), they were throwing Vibranium nukes at him and they weren't fazing him at all! Rulk gets ripped apart.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
Morlun breaks him like primary adamantium

seeing as he done neither that be quite a feat.

Did it on panel

He's a beast

Originally posted by zopzop
This Morlun?!

Screw the "secondary" Adamantium ripping feat (assuming it was secondary in the first place), they were throwing Vibranium nukes at him and they weren't fazing him at all! Rulk gets ripped apart.

I agree that feat more impressive then ripping secondary adamatium. it is secondary. if it was primary it would have been stated as such and could not be made into a net in the first place.

Why would Rulk be ripped apart? You do get that Rulk could very well replicate that very feat right?

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
Did it on panel

He's a beast


No he dident. he ripped secondary adamatium. The fact it was a net should have been a dead give away. You know since primary adamatium is not malleable at all. And then there also the fact the most common version by far is secondary. And the fact it was never stated or suggested to be primary adamatium.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
No he dident. he ripped secondary adamatium. The fact it was a net should have been a dead give away. You know since primary adamatium is not malleable at all. And then there also the fact the most common version by far is secondary. And the fact it was never stated or suggested to be primary adamatium.
Since when was secondary adamantium malleable enough to make into a net? Secondary is just less durable, not super malleable.
Suspension of disbelief

If it was secondary adamantium, it would have been called secondary.

cue big argument

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
Since when was secondary adamantium malleable enough to make into a net?

If it was secondary adamantium, it would have been called secondary.

cue big argument


Since always. thats the advantage of it, it far more malleable, cheaper and much easier to come by.

No it wouldent of. Secondary is the most common and is often referred to as simply adamatium.

No need for a big arguement. It the most common type and it malleable. there zero reason to assume it the most rare type that is not malleable at all but some how got magically turned into a net. your simply reaching.