Spider-Man VS Gotham City

Started by JakeTheBank13 pages
Originally posted by Sin I AM
please enlighten me who is on the level of hush, ras al ghul, or joker?

The Jackal for one.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
People don't know who Spider-Man is apparently. Lol.

I know right.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
fails how? there is not alot of depth to the plot involving spidermans villians.

How havent you failed? I have easily counter every single one of your arguements. You have constantly display utter ignorance of spiderman oh and more over which one of your arguements have you prove? oh thats right none of them.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
for the most part they are simpletons,

No there not at all and the ones that are which are by the way in the minority, are significantly more powerful then almost all of Batmans rogues.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
with a few exceptions, and Osborn has since elevated to an avenger level threat so i wouldnt even use him.

of course you dont wanna use him he shits all over your rediculous arguements.

Oh so because he now a higher threat (through smarts by the way, the thing you keep trying to pretend spiderman villain dont have) we ignore his decades of appearances of being spidermans arch enemy? no ****ing of course we don't. the fact it shits on your arguement does not mean you can ignore it.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Kinpin is more of a DD threat than spiderman anymore,

Again how does that change the fact he was a villain of spidermans for years?

I dont get why you believe you can just ignore these things.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Venom is a "good-guy",

Again how does this change the fact for decades he was not a good guy?

I not sure why you think the fact the character has changed sides mean Spiderman experience with dealing with them some how magically disappears

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Electro sucks, Sandman sucks, Rhino jobs,

and yet all three of them would likely tool most of batmans rogues.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Carnage is known for being a sadistic killer not a strategic tactical

Yes and? he vastly more powerful then 99% of batmans rogues.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
planner...the only ones id give u are Mr negative, mysterio and the chameleon and even then they are generally defeated quite easily without any civilian casualties

And i care who you give me because? The fact your delusional moron does not change the fact your arguements are down right stupid. you have zero evidence. And you can simply ignore characters showing because you dislike the fact they shit on your arguements.

Oh and now the fact he beats guys fast means they should be ignored? Honestly looks like your arguements are "everything I don't like and destroys my feeble arguements are to be ignored"

Originally posted by Sin I AM

please enlighten me who is on the level of hush, ras al ghul, or joker?

In what? Most any of spiderman villains would stomp the utter shit out of them at once let a lone one on one.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
f.the only ones id give u are Mr negative, mysterio and the chameleon and even then they are generally defeated quite easily without any civilian casualties

Mr. Negative is actually really powerful. It will take the whole Batfamiliy and lots of prep to take him down.

Nah, Batkick ftw. Or Batman solos. 😉

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan

look you are not getting it. I never said batmans rogues are more powerful, i just said that OVERALL they are more cunning. its not that difficult a concept to grasp guy

Originally posted by Sin I AM
look you are not getting it. I never said batmans rogues are more powerful, i just said that OVERALL they are more cunning. its not that difficult a concept to grasp guy

I know what your arguement is. You keep trying to revises it as you get shot down. You are pathetic. Face it, your arguement were shit, dont try to pretend it was me not getting it, i understood completely what you were attempt to argue. it was wrong and reeked of ignorance.

^ Holy shit dude. haermm

Originally posted by Sin I AM
look you are not getting it. I never said batmans rogues are more powerful, i just said that OVERALL they are more cunning. its not that difficult a concept to grasp guy

This is true. Prometheus himself would run circles around most if not all Spidey's gallery.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
This is true. Prometheus himself would run circles around most if not all Spidey's gallery.
Based on?

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Based on?

I was wondering the same thing lol

Originally posted by Parmaniac Based on?

read cry for justice. prometheus's suit had an answer for every meta on the planet.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
and its not just joker whos a strategic genius, u have riddler, al ghul, black mask, hugo strange, hush, tha mad hatter, scarecrow, etc...people who will kill just to get a point across. parker doesnt face that level of psychosis on a regular basis

The Jackal
Scarecrow (yeah ironic isn't it?)
Psycho-Man
Dr. Angst
Dr. Octopus
Dr. Doom
D'Spayre
Norman Osborn
Morlun
Mr. Negative
Venom (when he figured out his identity)
Kraven

he might not face a few of them on a regular basis yet he has done quite well against them pretty much every time.

The interplay between Spider-Man and Batman's rogues wouldn't be nearly as well suited for Parker as it is for Bruce because the Bat-rogues are written and developed to challenge Batman, the ultimate human achiever, on every level.

That being said, while Bruce might be the ultimate human achiever, Peter Parker is super-human and an equally competent superhero. Generally speaking, he would measure up to or surpass Batman's ability to put his rogues down, though he might not navigate the obstacles made to challenge Bruce's detective abilities with the finesse that Batman employs.

Anyways, yeah, he'd do fine, generally.

How would he surpass him? Physically? Because there are some rogues that Spider-Man can't beat through pure physical force.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
How would he surpass him? Physically? Because there are some rogues that Spider-Man can't beat through pure physical force.

You mean like hydro-man and sandman who are both spiderman rogues?

This idea that spiderman would not fair in gothem is ridiculousness.

We're talking Batman's rogues. You can't take down Batman's rogues the exact same way. Batman has a bunch of versatile rogues that Spider-Man will have challenge with. Not to say they take a majority, but they are there.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
We're talking Batman's rogues. You can't take down Batman's rogues the exact same way. Batman has a bunch of versatile rogues that Spider-Man will have challenge with. Not to say they take a majority, but they are there.

Really which rogues cant spiderman take down? can we have a list? Because your begin very vague.

I ALREADY stated them! For **** sake read my posts. If it's PHYSICALLY:

Clayface (Some incrarnations have taken it to the JLA)
Prometheus
Ivy (if she is at her higher levels)

Originally posted by Prep-Man
I ALREADY stated them! For **** sake read my posts. If it's PHYSICALLY:

really can you quote were you stated this? because I dont see were you listed them at all prior to this post. Looks like you just kinda spazed about something you never even posted...........

Originally posted by Prep-Man
Clayface (Some incrarnations have taken it to the JLA)

Those same versions would beat batman though, so your p;oints pretyt stupid. Any version batman can beat should be within spidermans ability to beat. Clay face is much like sandman.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
Prometheus

You way overrate this guy. Spiderman would beat him. I not sure why you have ahard on for this guy, but there is little reason to assume spiderman would not take him the majority.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
[B]Ivy (if she is at her higher levels)

Same higher levels that would beat Batman.......

Your arguements are that spiderman cant beat guys that batman cant?