Originally posted by country1000How relevant in a Thanos vs Gladiator thread. Why don't we discuss how Wolverine's hair never seems to grow when his healing factor has restored burnt hair in seconds to his usual growth, while we're at it.
Its long enough, gladiator does not have many... Now if we were talking about thor, superman or hulk, then we would need days to post.
They also have a thousand more appearances as well, so there's that. At least you don't expect 4/5 appearances to have something terrible within them.
Originally posted by Sr J-BiebYou can expect anything in a comic book. This is a forum battle between thanos and gladiator, yet you present low showings from a comic?? The OP says gladiator at his best i think.. meaning the planet destroying gladiator, guess which one you are trying to use. Nice try.
How relevant in a Thanos vs Gladiator thread. Why don't we discuss how Wolverine's hair never seems to grow when his healing factor has restored burnt hair in seconds to his usual growth, while we're at it.They also have a thousand more appearances as well, so there's that. At least you don't expect 4/5 appearances to have something terrible within them.
Originally posted by country1000
You can expect anything in a comic book. This is a forum battle between thanos and gladiator, yet you present low showings from a comic?? The OP says gladiator at his best i think.. meaning the planet destroying gladiator, guess which one you are trying to use. Nice try.
you just said it was irrelevent that bieb showed a scan from a comic but then you used a scene from a comic to justify your claim that he's a planet-buster. 😐
a question: where has he ever used 'planet-busting force' in a fight? nowhere? perhaps that is because it would be out of character for him to do so, and 'at his best' does NOT mean 'no CIS'.
secondly, what makes you think (since he has never before or since demonstrated planet-busting' power against anyone or anything) that THAT scene wasn't PIS?
you call PIS more than almost anyone i've seen. that is always a poor excuse and never wins debates. in fact, it is about the surest sign there is that you are badly losing a debate......
Originally posted by leonidas
you just said it was irrelevent that bieb showed a scan from a comic but then you used a scene from a comic to justify your claim that he's a planet-buster. 😐a question: where has he ever used 'planet-busting force' in a fight? nowhere? perhaps that is because it would be out of character for him to do so, and 'at his best' does NOT mean 'no CIS'.
secondly, what makes you think (since he has never before or since demonstrated planet-busting' power against anyone or anything) that THAT scene wasn't PIS?
you call PIS more than almost anyone i've seen. that is always a poor excuse and never wins debates. in fact, it is about the surest sign there is that you are badly losing a debate......
Originally posted by leonidasUsing a low showing in a thread where the OP states Gladiator at his best is what i am calling out. If gladiator is at his best, why didnt bieb use the planet busting scan?? You have a problem with gladiator destroying a planet? seems so. If i post a scan of a gas station explosion koing superman in a superman vs thanos thread where the OP has them at their best, i would expect people to get on my case also.
you just said it was irrelevent that bieb showed a scan from a comic but then you used a scene from a comic to justify your claim that he's a planet-buster. 😐a question: where has he ever used 'planet-busting force' in a fight? nowhere? perhaps that is because it would be out of character for him to do so, and 'at his best' does NOT mean 'no CIS'.
secondly, what makes you think (since he has never before or since demonstrated planet-busting' power against anyone or anything) that THAT scene wasn't PIS?
you call PIS more than almost anyone i've seen. that is always a poor excuse and never wins debates. in fact, it is about the surest sign there is that you are badly losing a debate......
Originally posted by abhilegend
He's from cbr, where gladiator rivals flash in speed and pc superman in strength based upon 2 or 3 scans. They consider all his fights where he loses PIS, just imagine the rest.
Have you ironed supermans underwear yet? He needs them for his next issue. Dont use too much starch.
Originally posted by country1000
Using a low showing in a thread where the OP states Gladiator at his best is what i am calling out. If gladiator is at his best, why didnt bieb use the planet busting scan?? You have a problem with gladiator destroying a planet? seems so. If i post a scan of a gas station explosion koing superman is a superman vs thanos thread where the OP has them at their best, i would expect people to get on my case also.
i don't care what bieb showed. i want to know why you don't view the planet feat as PIS when it has never been close to replicated by him. so?
it can really only be because of 2 reasons--it was pis in the first place, or for him to use that power in a fight would be out of character, hence cis would prevent it. either way, it's a useless feat when discussing how he'd do in a battle--forum or not. him standing and repeatedly punching an unmoving, unresisting planet/rock is in no way relevent to how he would do against a LIVING opponent. how do i know? because he has NEVER USED THAT LEVEL OF POWER IN A FIGHT BEFORE OR SINCE.
Originally posted by country1000I'm making light of the thread because it's much funnier to watch Gladiator's low feats than it is to watch one guy who admitted he knows nothing about Gladiator argue for him over Thanos based on one feat.
You can expect anything in a comic book. This is a forum battle between thanos and gladiator, yet you present low showings from a comic?? The OP says gladiator at his best i think.. meaning the planet destroying gladiator, guess which one you are trying to use. Nice try.
The OP said Gladiator was fully confident. I'm sure he didn't have a sudden confidence drop when he was about to strike Lilandra down. And fully confident Gladiator wasn't perfect. Actually, any feat from Gladiator isn't on Thanos' level... and that's the sad part. Just because one feat is farther away from his level than another, that doesn't mean it gives him a greater chance.
Also, lol at the hypocrisy.
"You no use low showings because Gladiator's best feat goes against that."
You realize that the Thor/Glads fight can be called a low feat following this logic. A low feat for Thor.
Also, penis penis penis.
I think I've made my point.
Originally posted by leonidasBUT IT CLEARLY SHOWS HE HAS THAT KIND OF POWER. How many times has thor lifted that snake off the earth? how many times superman destroyed a shadow moon? how many times has hulk destroyed an asteriod twice the size of earth? you say nothing about those ONE TIME FEATS as pis do you?
i don't care what bieb showed. i want to know why you don't view the planet feat as PIS when it has never been close to replicated by him. so?it can really only be because of 2 reasons--it was pis in the first place, or for him to use that power in a fight would be out of character, hence cis would prevent it. either way, it's a useless feat when discussing how he'd do in a battle--forum or not. him standing and repeatedly punching an unmoving, unresisting planet/rock is in no way relevent to how he would do against a LIVING opponent. how do i know? because he has NEVER USED THAT LEVEL OF POWER IN A FIGHT BEFORE OR SINCE.
Originally posted by Sr J-BiebI see you know nothing about forum battles.
I'm making light of the thread because it's much funnier to watch Gladiator's low feats than it is to watch one guy who admitted he knows nothing about Gladiator argue for him over Thanos based on one feat.
This isn't a fight, it's a slaughter. Thanos has sex with Gladiator's body and cleans it up with Gladiator's cape. But at least I'm keeping on topic as opposed to trying to defend Gladiator because other people not in this thread have low showings.The OP said Gladiator was fully confident. I'm sure he didn't have a sudden confidence drop when he was about to strike Lilandra down. And fully confident Gladiator wasn't perfect. Actually, any feat from Gladiator isn't on Thanos' level... and that's the sad part. Just because one feat is farther away from his level than another, that doesn't mean it gives him a greater chance.
Also, lol at the hypocrisy.
"You no use low showings because Gladiator's best feat goes against that."You realize that the Thor/Glads fight can be called a low feat following this logic. A low feat for Thor.
Also, penis penis penis.
I think I've made my point.
Originally posted by country1000
BUT IT CLEARLY SHOWS HE HAS THAT KIND OF POWER. How many times has thor lifted that snake off the earth? how many times superman destroyed a shadow moon? how many times has hulk destroyed an asteriod twice the size of earth? you say nothing about those ONE TIME FEATS as pis do you?
I dont know about everyone else but Thor has 3 showings where in it was shown that he had the strength to actually overpower the Serpent soooo.... yeah
Thor's feat = not PIS
Everyone else's feats = one time showing = PIS
🤣
Originally posted by country1000We use all showings not just high ones 😬
Using a low showing in a thread where the OP states Gladiator at his best is what i am calling out. If gladiator is at his best, why didnt bieb use the planet busting scan?? You have a problem with gladiator destroying a planet? seems so. If i post a scan of a gas station explosion koing superman in a superman vs thanos thread where the OP has them at their best, i would expect people to get on my case also.
Originally posted by country1000
BUT IT CLEARLY SHOWS HE HAS THAT KIND OF POWER. How many times has thor lifted that snake off the earth? how many times superman destroyed a shadow moon? how many times has hulk destroyed an asteriod twice the size of earth? you say nothing about those ONE TIME FEATS as pis do you?
😂
so you never answered the question: what makes you think that the glads planet busting feat is not pis?
sure, i'll readily admit the thor/serpent could be viewed as pis. i think the feat is idiotic, tbh. no problem. supes has come close many times to the moon feat so there is some corroboration there. the hulk feat could easily be viewed as pis, but he has shaken dimensions in the past, punched energy and in general has strength feats that are absurb--all of which could be used to corroborate that feat. call it pis though--i.....really don't care. 😐
glads has nothing CLOSE to the planet feat. so, again (be real cool if you actually answered the question instead of prevaricating with ridiculously transparent questions of your own.....) is the planet feat pis or does his dearth of corroborating feats equate to cis? simple question really.......
Originally posted by country1000He destoryed the shadow moon in that JLA issue-
How many times has thor lifted that snake off the earth? how many times superman destroyed a shadow moon?
The feats all these other characters do once in their entire careers, Superman does casually all the time. That's the difference between them.