Gladiator vs Thanos (slugfest)

Started by carver920 pages

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
I try but my thoughs are quite distracted lately^^. Still Thanos wouldn't have created an Glads-Thanosi if Glads wouldn't be physically more powerful then Thanos himself. Which isn't a shame. I don't need more proof that Glads is stronger and faster. Thanos takes the durability tough.
Don't you agree? 🙂

Edit:@Quan, I can't get mad at you too, because you are an Thanos fanatic and you can't even name one being you would consider his superior^^. So no offense taken, I'm still more objective then you can ever hope to be, thanks to your obsession of Marvel in general and Thanos in particular. You DC hate helps too btw^^.

D***... Good point. Then Gladiator DNA made the Thanos clone 4 times stronger than Thanos.

Originally posted by carver9
D***... Good point. Then Gladiator DNA made the Thanos clone 4 times stronger than Thanos.

👆

Originally posted by carver9
D***... Good point. Then Gladiator DNA made the Thanos clone 4 times stronger than Thanos.
The Galactus clone was almost twice as powerful as Galactus. That means clones can be far more powerful than their counterparts. Where is your proof clones are equal to their counterparts ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
The Galactus clone was almost twice as powerful as Galactus. That means clones can be far more powerful than their counterparts. Where is your proof clones are equal to their counterparts ?

You are missing the point. Thanos used Gladiator DNA for a reason and Gladiator DNA made the Thanos clone far more stronger than Thanos.

Originally posted by Badabing
Thanos gets punched...in the face!

Lol...this.

You don't need this proof, as it is an amalgated DNA, two beings not one. Sure a clone can be more powerful then one individual if it is made of two individuals, supposed that one DNA doesn't decrase the power of the stronger being. That said, Thanos took the DNA of beings superior to himself in some attributes, so he could combine them to something better. Else he could have taken Things DNA but he didn't as he is stronger then Thing, it wouldn't make sense, so he took Glads, someone with greater strength and speed. That's why the result was stronger then Thanos for sure 🙂. Thanos isn't an idiot after all, don't you agree 😉.

Originally posted by carver9
You are missing the point. Thanos used Gladiator DNA for a reason and Gladiator DNA made the Thanos clone far more stronger than Thanos.
And he also made the Galactus clone more powerful than Galactus. So why does the Gladiator clone have to be equal to Gladiator when the Galactus clone isn't ? Oh that's right because you like Gladiator. Proof who needs it, amirite ?

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
You don't need this proof, as it is an amalgated DNA, two beings not one. Sure a clone can be more powerful then one individual if it is made of two individuals, supposed that one DNA doesn't decrase the power of the stronger being. That said, Thanos took the DNA of beings superior to himself in some attributes, so he could combine them to something better. Else he could have taken Things DNA but he didn't as he is stronger then Thing, it wouldn't make sense, so he took Glads, someone with greater strength and speed. That's why the result was stronger then Thanos for sure 🙂. Thanos isn't an idiot after all, don't you agree 😉.
Yes, you do since the Galactus clone was far more powerful than Galactus. Galactus clone was more powerful than the original so why can't the Gladiator clone be more powerful than Gladiator ? You made the claim and thus the burden falls on your shoulders. That's what debating is not saying random things and acting like that's debating.

Come on man.

Originally posted by carver9
You are missing the point. Thanos used Gladiator DNA for a reason and Gladiator DNA made the Thanos clone far more stronger than Thanos.

...You were told before to not try to use this as evidence.

Quan, so it might be that the clone is stronger then Glads, not sure if in the pure strenght sense, but because of Thanos superior durability and energy output. That's fine. Fact is, he is stronger then Thanos because of Glads DNA, he wouldn't be otherwise, which, considering Thanos intellect and him making what he does quite reasonable, leads to the only conclusion that Gladiator has to be Thanos physical superior. 🙂

And it doesn't matter if Gladiator is two times stronger or three times stronger or like the Thanosi four times stronger. The only thing that matters is, that he indeed is.

Originally posted by -Pr-
...You were told before to not try to use this as evidence.

Forgot about that...my bad.

As for the fight...Thanos wins after a long battle.

Thanos wins... after about 3 to 4 punches

Originally posted by Badabing
Thanos gets punched...in the face!

.....and gets ktfo.thanduros

Glads at his best wins this.

Lulz at stupid people.

Thanos wins. Gladiator is no pushover though.

Thanos would murder stomp Gladiator.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
Quan, so it might be that the clone is stronger then Glads, not sure if in the pure strenght sense, but because of Thanos superior durability and energy output. That's fine. Fact is, he is stronger then Thanos because of Glads DNA, he wouldn't be otherwise, which, considering Thanos intellect and him making what he does quite reasonable, leads to the only conclusion that Gladiator has to be Thanos physical superior. 🙂

And it doesn't matter if Gladiator is two times stronger or three times stronger or like the Thanosi four times stronger. The only thing that matters is, that he indeed is.

Thanos made all kinds of clones that doesn't mean the clones are equal to their counterparts. There's no proof Gladiator is greater than Thanos. None. You can rest your entire case under the flawed premise this clone equals Gladiator.

Not even Gladiator supports favor him here. You're wrong and aren't knowledgeable enough to know the difference.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos made all kinds of clones that doesn't mean the clones are equal to their counterparts. There's no proof Gladiator is greater than Thanos. None. You can rest your entire case under the flawed premise this clone equals Gladiator.

Not even Gladiator supports favor him here. You're wrong and aren't knowledgeable enough to know the difference.

Now you are childish.... so go on with your *mimimiyouprovedmewrongbuti won'tacceptitandyouknownothingaboutmybelovedThanos*mimimi

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
Now you are childish.... so go on with your *mimimiyouprovedmewrongbuti won'tacceptitandyouknownothingaboutmybelovedThanos*mimimi
No one here agrees in fact it's mod ruled against and I didn't even pull that card. It was a weak faulty abc logic case which says ignore everything about the Gladiator remember that clone that wasn't the Gladiator.

Thanos stomps.