Gladiator vs Thanos (slugfest)

Originally posted by quanchi112
No one here agrees in fact it's mod ruled against and I didn't even pull that card. It was a weak faulty abc logic case which says ignore everything about the Gladiator remember that clone that wasn't the Gladiator.

Thanos stomps.

Mods are Humans, some not even that *cough Bada. And I never heard of it, anyway. It's not even ABC logic as Thanos made those clones himself, it's common sense, and well that means you think Thanos is an idiot, that's ok with me. And no he doesn't, he amps and wins, but he does not stomp easily.^^

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
Mods are Humans, some not even that *cough Bada. And I never heard of it, anyway. It's not even ABC logic as Thanos made those clones himself, it's common sense, and well that means you think Thanos is an idiot, that's ok with me. And no he doesn't, he amps and wins, but he does not stomp easily.^^

You don't know enough about the characters to make a case. Thanos is beyond Gladiator I mean Masterson Thor almost killed him. Everyone in here disagrees with you. It's ok I forgive you for being wrong again.

Sure, if Thanos altered the Clone to store the energy longer or better then G, then why not. We are talking about physical strength, clearly stated 4 times as much, and he choose Gladiators DNA to accomplish this (his physical superior), there is nothing to argue about, you are wrong or Thanos is wrong, you choice^^.
It seems i know more then you^^. And Masterson had help, before that Glads was winning, read the comic, it helps^^.
BTW most of the time people tend to disagre with you, never bothered you though 😉, so it's an weak excuse/argument because you lost^^. Learn to live with it and learn ^^.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
Mods are Humans, some not even that *cough Bada. And I never heard of it, anyway. It's not even ABC logic as Thanos made those clones himself, it's common sense, and well that means you think Thanos is an idiot, that's ok with me. And no he doesn't, he amps and wins, but he does not stomp easily.^^

can i see the quote where he says 4x the strength?

can i also see the part where it is specific in saying glads is stronger n more powerful than thanos.. n it wasnt just saying it will make the clone 4x stronger with the mixture thanos was brewing

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
Sure, if Thanos altered the Clone to store the energy longer or better then G, then why not. We are talking about physical strength, clearly stated 4 times as much, and he choose Gladiators DNA to accomplish this (his physical superior), there is nothing to argue about, you are wrong or Thanos is wrong, you choice^^.
It seems i know more then you^^. And Masterson had help, before that Glads was winning, read the comic, it helps^^.
BTW most of the time people tend to disagre with you, never bothered you though 😉, so it's an weak excuse/argument because you lost^^. Learn to live with it and learn ^^.

You never understand a simple point. I am not arguing formidability I am arguing durability. Masterson almost killed him while the real power gem Thor only caused a smile from Thanos.

Your opinions are just your own you have no basis and lack understanding.

lol at Gladiator being 4 times stronger than Thanos because Thanos created a clone.

Warrior (the Gladiator clone) was said to be 4x more powerful than Thanos by Adam Warlock if I am not mistaken.

And Adam Warlock was wrong as he has NEVER been punched by Thanos to gauge his strength, unless he has a Thanos punchometer on him

Thanos slightly edges Glads if we are taking average glads. But peak Glads wins this but not easy.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos slightly edges Glads if we are taking average glads. But peak Glads wins this but not easy.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
What are Gladiator's feats?

Busting a planet into pieces with few blows.

Originally posted by h1a8
Busting a planet into pieces with few blows.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
What else?

Originally posted by Mistress-Death
And Adam Warlock was wrong as he has NEVER been punched by Thanos to gauge his strength, unless he has a Thanos punchometer on him

You do realize that it was the writer that said it, and not really Adam Warlock. Marvel wanted to give the reader a range as to how powerful Warrior was, and that was what they did on panel. It had little to do with a silly punchometer. If this were the case, we might as well throw out anything that any character says when they speak of another characters strength, simply because we don't agree, I mean who the hell are you to make any claims? Exactly just another reader.

Are you saying that Warlock has never been hit by Thanos in his entire history? It's the fans that make claims that Thanos is this and that much stronger without citations to prove it. So unless it has been explicitly stated on panel that a particular character has jumped up an entire weight class, it's just hearsay.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
What else?

Originally posted by h1a8
That's all I need.

You actually know nothing about Gladiator other than he busted a planet once, don't you?

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
You couldn't find any other impressive feats could you?

You actually know nothing about Gladiator other than he busted a planet once, don't you?

This is the truth Ruth. I don't deny it. At least I can't remember any other feats by Glads and don't care really. The planet busting one is the one.

Originally posted by h1a8
This is the truth Ruth. I don't deny it. At least I can't remember any other feats by Glads and don't care really. The planet busting one is the one.

How is this supposed to work?

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
So you know absolutely nothing about the character, yet think he can lose or win based on the one feat you know?

How is this supposed to work?

Not knowing of other feats that compare to the planet busting one doesn't mean I know nothing of Gladiator. Also, it is irrelevant of what other feats he has since characters fight at their best ability as shown before (plus it was the OPs intention as well). Other showings would only be used to attempt an average (which me and you disagree on).

Originally posted by h1a8
Not knowing of other feats that compare to the planet busting one doesn't mean I know nothing of Gladiator. Also, it is irrelevant of what other feats he has since characters fight at their best ability as shown before (plus it was the OPs intention as well). Other showings would only be used to attempt an average (which me and you disagree on).

So to the best of their ability means you only need to base it off of one high feat? Not even close.
Even so, you know or should know Thanos' feats by now, and by your admission, you only know one feat of Gladiator's... You must really hate Thanos.