aquaman vs spiderman

Originally posted by -Pr-
i'm not talking about drag resistance; i'm talking about atmospheric pressure. Aquaman, unlike a lot of that sea-life, has his own internal pressure, and said pressure has to negate the crushing depths of the ocean. that makes him super strong and super durable, and means that when he's on land, where the gravity isn't so intense, he's able to lift a whole lot more.

we are going around in circles on this. I am finished with the underwater argument.

if u want to argue surface feet planted on the ground strength feat I be happy to continue discussing them two.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
and again atmospheric pressure doesnt mean much if u are acclimated by it. Aquaman more so since he breaths water which means he wont blow up and it becomes easier for him once his body matches the pressure of his surroundings.

we are going around in circles on this. I am finished with the underwater argument.

if u want to argue surface feet planted on the ground strength feat I be happy to continue discussing them two.

but that's the thing; he's stronger and more durable BECAUSE he's adapted to the pressure. his body is strong enough to resist it and to move through it.

Sure, if you want.

The pressure at the bottom of the ocean =/= the pressure at the bottom of a pool. Plus it also depends on what you're lifting. If you're lifting a person, of course it will be easier to pick them up because they have body fat and fat floats. But a 40 lb dumbbell will be just as hard or harder depending on how deep you are.

How do you people think ship anchors work??

Originally posted by Odekahn
The pressure at the bottom of the ocean =/= the pressure at the bottom of a pool. Plus it also depends on what you're lifting. If you're lifting a person, of course it will be easier to pick them up because they have body fat and fat floats. But a 40 lb dumbbell will be just as hard or harder depending on how deep you are.

How do you people think ship anchors work??

but the object in question depends on how pores it is and even if it is a slap of metal or rock it still has its weight displaced by water.. hence it will be lighter to an extend.

Originally posted by Odekahn
The pressure at the bottom of the ocean =/= the pressure at the bottom of a pool. Plus it also depends on what you're lifting. If you're lifting a person, of course it will be easier to pick them up because they have body fat and fat floats. But a 40 lb dumbbell will be just as hard or harder depending on how deep you are.

How do you people think ship anchors work??

Pr, why did you ignore me?

Originally posted by Odekahn
The pressure at the bottom of the ocean =/= the pressure at the bottom of a pool. Plus it also depends on what you're lifting. If you're lifting a person, of course it will be easier to pick them up because they have body fat and fat floats. But a 40 lb dumbbell will be just as hard or harder depending on how deep you are.

How do you people think ship anchors work??

Go to Archimedes' principle, 2nd quote

Originally posted by Mindset
Not the way you think, apparently.

Pr, why did you ignore me?

I just don't care.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy

Go to Archimedes' principle, 2nd quote

That isn't what we're talking about, though.

I speak facts.

You just

Originally posted by Mindset
I speak facts.

You just

I never said I disagreed with you.

Hold me.

Originally posted by Mindset
Hold me.

😂

Originally posted by Nietzschean
an anchor is dragged until it catches undo something.

I was more so thinking of a deadweight anchor

Deadweight anchor
This is an anchor which relies solely on being a heavy weight. It is usually just a large block of concrete or stone at the end of the chain. Its holding power is defined by its weight underwater (i.e. taking its buoyancy into account) regardless of the type of seabed, although suction can increase this if it becomes buried.

But...

I did find this: Buoyancy reduces the apparent weight of objects that have sunk completely to the sea floor. It is generally easier to lift an object up through the water than it is to pull it out of the water.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy#Density

So it would be easier to lift it than on land.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy

Go to Archimedes' principle, 2nd quote

Haha!! That's what I was doing while you posted that. Guess we thought a like.

I was wrong.

purely off feats alone and quantity on the surface world Spiderman is stronger by far.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatmanvsWolverine/news/?a=48785

Originally posted by Nietzschean
purely off feats alone and quantity on the surface world Spiderman is stronger by far.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatmanvsWolverine/news/?a=48785

You seriously think those are above Aquaman's best? That he couldn't reproduce those?

Too much nerd talk in this thread. Oh and arthur is stronger, a lot stronger than spidey. I can post a scan of cap holding a part of building too.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Too much nerd talk in this thread. Oh and arthur is stronger, a lot stronger than spidey. I can post a scan of cap holding a part of building too.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
cap isnt in this thread 😉

Originally posted by abhilegend
I was just giving an example of how heaps of feats alone don't make someone stronger.

u want to argument be my guest, i agree with u. I remember when Aquaman was barely above peak/slight superhuman in strength.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
and yet my argument was strictly by showings spiderman has more strength feats than Aquaman.

u want to argument be my guest, i agree with u. I remember when Aquaman was barely above peak/slight superhuman in strength.