aquaman vs spiderman

I looked at the Spidey feats and cant see anything that Arthur would struggle with. This thread seems silly to me. Why isnt it obvious to everybody that Aquaman is stronger?

^ Well its kmc, what do you expect?

Originally posted by Nietzschean
and yet my argument was strictly by showings spiderman has more strength feats than Aquaman.

u want to argument be my guest, i agree with u. I remember when Aquaman was barely above peak/slight superhuman in strength.

More =/= better, though.

And no, he hasn't been at that level for years now. He just was portrayed really inconsistently for a time. Post mid-90s though, he's been a multi-tonner by a fair bit.

Originally posted by tkitna
I looked at the Spidey feats and cant see anything that Arthur would struggle with. This thread seems silly to me. Why isnt it obvious to everybody that Aquaman is stronger?

Because god-forbid Aquaman was actually useful for something other than talking to fish.

In all honesty though, his feats just aren't that well known.

Originally posted by -Pr-
More =/= better, though.

And no, he hasn't been at that level for years now. He just was portrayed really inconsistently for a time. Post mid-90s though, he's been a multi-tonner by a fair bit.

going with aquaman.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Even if you wanted to argue that (though I don't agree), he still has feats I think Spider-Man would have trouble replicating.

Like using a crane as a bludgeoning tool, or knocking Martian Manhunter on his ass (twice), lifting a city block, throwing a bus at an Omac, supporting the weight of a building that was about to collapse, and the other stuff i mentioned of course.

Aquaman's strength is relatively more consistent than Spider-Man's, too.

Like Parmaniac and Nietzschean been telling he either can or has replicated most of those feats. Throwing/catching buses or trucks, knocking class 100 on their asses, supporting collapsing building, while under water causing a huge warehouse to collapse and using a tank (not mini-tank but A tank) as a bludgeoning tool. As for punching Superboy that far Pete did simillar thing to Scorpion. And while Scorpion is no Superboy this is about weight, not strength.

What im saying is, if the feats you mentioned are Arthur's best then they're pretty close. Only thing that seems to be out of Pete's weightclass is lifting a city block. But I dont know context behind this feat. If Pete pulled it off it wouldnt be the first time he performed a (seemingly) class 100 feat.

Aquaman. How has this thread lasted 4 pages?

Aquaman's stronger, handily.

Aquaman stomps.

lol, Aquaman.

Such a stupidly underrated character.

Although Spiderman is my 2nd favourite character, after Hulk, i think that he may be second to Aquaman in strength. That being said, Pete is nothing to be sniffed at.

Aquaman is, without a doubt, a lot stronger.

I truly think Spider-Man is the safer bet on land, at least if telepathy is out of the equation and it was a comic.

Edit: Who's stronger? On paper, Aquaman, in practice/feats, not sure.

Aquaman's stronger.

As far as DCnU goes, even that Aquaman displayed a strength feat well beyond Spider-Man's ability.

The point is, it's not a stomp he's not facing Hulk or someone like that.

Peter's got crazy durability feats anyway as opposed to his strength.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Aquaman displayed a strength feat well beyond Spider-Man's ability.

?

Pr needs to hurry up with that respect thread, I don't think I've seen every best strength feat that Arthur has so I might not be doing him justice.

Yeah, he recently sealed an underwater trench by physically moving a mass of solid land underwater.

How is that beyond Spiderman's lifting feats?

It must be more impressive than it sounds.

I already argued about this feat because on panel (art) it wasn't THAT big.