Originally posted by juggerman
im constantly saying things like "according to Zim" and "if that is what happened" so how am i just going with what he said is the truth? have you even been paying attention?
Hahahaa, such a fail-troll. Did you somehow forget that we also spoke (ie you tried to troll again) in Marius' forum where you clearly went with the racist angle against Martin?
I know you're a loon stalky, but come on.
Hahahaa, such a fail-troll. Did you somehow forget that we also spoke in Marius' forum where you clearly went with the racist angle against Martin?I know you're a loon stalky, but come on.
i believe you have me confused with someone else Tard
its ok tho you constantly make mistakes so what more can i expect?
Originally posted by juggerman
if youre so sure back it up then. show me where i said that.if not then ill take that as an admission of your stupidity and confusion.
Your games aren't worth me scanning through hours of live-chat msging on Marius' forum. I'd also not want this profile to get banned, not that it'd matter in the end, as you'd just make a yet another one. But your banning is not something I want to be a part of.
Yes, yes, covered that "herp-derp and all that." Got it.
Your games aren't worth me scanning through hours of live-chat msging on Marius' forum. I'd also not want this profile to get banned, not that it'd matter in the end, as you'd just make a new one. But your banning is not something I want to be a part of.Yes, yes, covered that "herp-derp and all that." Got it.
thank you for your admission of your stupidity and confusion. now i can move on to better things
"yawn" anyway like i said earlier (before your stupidity ran rampant) ive constantly been saying things like "according to Zim" and such so clearly im not just taking him at his word.
no evidence has come forward (that i know about) that refutes his claim in any way. which logic would then lead one to believe that until shown otherwise Trayvon did strike Zimmerman in the face and then proceeded to slam his head into the ground
Originally posted by juggerman
"yawn" anyway like i said earlier (before your stupidity ran rampant) ive constantly been saying things like "according to Zim" and such so clearly im not just taking him at his word.no evidence has come forward (that i know about) that refutes his claim in any way. which logic would then lead one to believe that until shown otherwise Trayvon did strike Zimmerman in the face and then proceeded to slam his head into the ground
Hahaha, you seem mad. That's taking him at his word, unless there's irrefutable proof that Martin did strike first and then slammed his head.
"I'm not taking Zimmerman at his words, but until it's proven his claims(words) are untrue, they're fact."
Hahaha. That's taking him at his word, unless there's irrefutable proof that Martin did strike first and then slammed his head.
i never said Martin hit him first. and alot of people are going by what could have happened and im going by an eyewitness account yet im doing something wrong?
and again this story of Zimmermans is yet to be shown to be false. with todays technology (bullet trajectory, blood splatter analise, gun power residue) the fact that it hasnt been refuted says something
"I'm not taking Zimmerman at his words, but until it's proven his claims(words) are untrue, they're fact." WTF, man.
didnt say they were fact hence the "if it happened that way" stuff. please keep up
Originally posted by juggerman
i never said Martin hit him first. and alot of people are going by what could have happened and im going by an eyewitness account yet im doing something wrong?and again this story of Zimmermans is yet to be shown to be false. with todays technology (bullet trajectory, blood splatter analise, gun power residue) the fact that it hasnt been refuted says something
there was no forensic investigation. man you're not all here are you?
tell you what: ljahsfbdlygasdlfjhgalydfglashjfgajhsdf
Originally posted by juggerman
i never said Martin hit him first. and alot of people are going by what could have happened and im going by an eyewitness account yet im doing something wrong?and again this story of Zimmermans is yet to be shown to be false. with todays technology (bullet trajectory, blood splatter analise, gun power residue) the fact that it hasnt been refuted says something
You're saying "I'm not taking Zimmerman at his word", when you're doing exactly that. Which is fine, just don't continue to be an idiot about it by insisting you're not, okay?
I'm sorry, has the case gone to trial? Have experts who [may have]examined the crime-scene testified already in court?
Originally posted by inimalist
ok... but "standing one's ground" colloquially is different from using the stand your ground defense. the latter, by definition, cannot apply to Martin
No, I put it in quotes to refer, specifically, to Florida's law.
What I said was correct about the law as it pertained to this case. That's what his lawyers are or will use in his defense on this case.
Originally posted by inimalist
the medics who examined him at the scene and the medical report from zimmermans family doctorhis most serious injury was a broken nose. idk, we can argue the semantics of "minor", it certainly isn't serious or life threatening
[My comments my seem unrelated to what you're saying above, but bear with me.]
Oh man, I just read what you're talking about (I do not watch TV nor do I read news often...so I did not know about the release of the medical records).
That changes my opinion of this case.
What Zimmerman was saying is being supported by the medical evidence. The boy had no injuries except for broken skin on his knuckles.
Originally posted by inimalist
you do realize this information is already part of the public record? sorry for researching the points I want to make, /shrug
Indeed. The last I had read/heard was that the medical records were yet to be released. To me, it seemed like you were making strange conclusions that had no base in the real world. I apologize.
Originally posted by inimalist
maybe I should come up with unrelated hypotheticals that are entirely irrelevant, then I can be part of the bro crew!
Like what? I am not privy to this obvious "inside-joke" comment you are making.
Originally posted by Robtard
Clearly this is how Zimmerman sustained his wounds, after he shot Martin.
Indeed: punches for children tickle. 😄
Originally posted by focus4chumps
like someone here who repeats "troll" over and over.
Passive-aggressive butthurt smells good. 🙂
Originally posted by juggerman
and again this story of Zimmermans is yet to be shown to be false. with todays technology (bullet trajectory, blood splatter analise, gun power residue) the fact that it hasnt been refuted says something
Those are good points but we will not know how the foresnics work into the case until they are presented in court....
unless those were released, already, as well? 😐
Originally posted by focus4chumps
there was no forensic investigation. man you're not all here are you?
How do you know this? It just doesn't seem right, at all, that no "forensic investigation" has been done.