Man follows black teen who seems "suspicious" and kills him.

Started by Setoiei19878 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
Novice troll, you're starting to make it way to obvious who you are in your main account and I wouldn't want that one to be perma-banned. Shape up 🙂

Professional troll, seeing as we don't know each other, there's no reason for useless threats. Please stop crying. I think I would enjoy sitting back and watching you and dadumon cry at the lack of justice of the case in question, and the lack of support you two little girls are getting on this forum 😂

As for Ush, you've done more than help that case with your hilariously retarded trolling. Keep up the good work 😂

See, the outright lying tactics. That's a solid maker and could get your main booted.

Really sloppy lies too, as you claimed you 'knew' me just 2 pages ago. Shape up, "kiddo" 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
See, the outright lying tactics. That's a solid maker. Shape up, "kiddo" 🙂

Ah yes, the outright lying tactics. Just like Zimmerman's "outright" lying tactics. My lord, you're not exactly adept at finding deception, but you're an absolute pro at rationalizations 😂

Why did you edit this out:

Originally posted by Robtard

Really sloppy lies too, as you claimed you 'knew' me just 2 pages ago. Shape up, "kiddo"

Shape up, son. You're being excessively sloppy here 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Why did you edit this out:

Shape up, son. You're being excessively sloppy here 🙂

Wow.. For someone accusing someone else of lying, you're sure doing a piss poor job of it. Tell me junior, where did I claim I knew you? Go ahead show us 😂

Sure, Page 63 🙂

Since you can't do simple maths 🙂

this all seems very familiar.

im speaking, of course, of the historical precedence of the case/topic, not quanchi's sock accounts.

Originally posted by Robtard
This is one of the very rare times where I misjudged and was wrong 🙂

It would be the fourth time such an event has occurred (where you admitted you were wrong).

Originally posted by Robtard
Sure, Page 63 🙂

Since you can't do simple maths 🙂

Maths? ROFL? I'm glad you posted a quote or anything relevant, I can see why you had such trouble understanding the verdict of the case because you're not familiar with facts or evidence. At this point I have to ask you who it is you think I am, because now you're just embarrassing yourself 😂

Edit: Just for shits and giggles and to reaffirm the notion that you're dumb beyond belief, I checked page 63 and saw nothing about me knowing who or what you were. But lets keep playing this game, I like it when my opponent is intellectually challenged 🙂

Maths, yes 🙂

Posting a quote is pointless, I already quoted that you had previously implied you "knew" me and I named the page. Posting the quote would just cause you to do more flips and we have enough.

If you're going to lie, don't do it when there's a contradiction sitting back just two pages away, that simple 🙂

Edit: I see you went back and read, saw your folly and are doing the flips I said you would 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Maths, yes 🙂

Posting a quote is pointless, I already quoted that you had previously implied you "knew" me and I named the page. Posting the quote would just cause you to do more flips and we have enough.

If you're going to lie, don't do it when there's a contradiction sitting back just two pages away, that simple 🙂

Translation: Because of my intellectual failings, I have confused you with someone else. However, I'm incredibly insecure so I need to save face somehow, so I'm going to continue calling you a liar and instead of providing proof, claim that it will just confuse you.

Concession accepted, sweetheart 😆

Originally posted by Setoiei198
Translation: Because of my intellectual failings, I have confused you with someone else. However, I'm incredibly insecure so I need to save face somehow, so I'm going to continue calling you a liar and instead of providing proof, claim that it will just confuse you.

Concession accepted, sweetheart 😆

Originally posted by BluthFamily
I know you're an angwwy little fella Robtard but don't allow those emotions to overcome logic, or lack thereof. 😆 😆

You said that after one post from me. Now do the flips and claim this is the first time we've spoken 🙂

A nice touch, BTW. Now that Focus has outed you.

So you translate a post where I called you out on being angry in your previous two posts as "you claimed you knew me!" Oh wow, the backpeddling is just priceless at this point. Here's where I quote my previous post and rest my case once again.

Translation: Because of my intellectual failings, I have confused you with someone else. However, I'm incredibly insecure so I need to save face somehow, so I'm going to continue calling you a liar and instead of providing proof, claim that it will just confuse you.

Concession accepted, sweetheart 😂

Also I have idea who focus is but after all the times I've embarrassed you today, I'm surprised you haven't blown up more. Instead it's humorous lies and misdirection. Keep trying sweetness🙂

No point in telling you to shape up again as you're not even trying anymore. Just doing the "no you!" and excessive back patting "I win!" repeats.

Look up what a 'backpedal' means, you still haven't got it down 🙂

Ah yes, after making you look like a fool for the millionth time, you go back to "no you" accusations. Amusing🙂

I have to admit that this was much more fun 2 hours ago, when your intellectual capabilities were at best suspect, but 2 hours later it's pretty clear that it isn't fair for me to pray on such a damaged being. It's just not fun, it's the equivalent of beating up a mentally challenged child. I'm sorry Robert🙁 I don't want you to be upset that your stupidity has been blown wide open, but if you would honor me, please keep the lying, backpeddling, and misdirection to a minimum, mk peaches? 😂

"No, you're doing the 'no you'!"

prey

spelling german.

Originally posted by Robtard
Nope shaky, it would take a genius to make new accounts. Give credit where credit is due.

...but whirly did it all the time. 😛