Who is Stronger...Wonder Woman or Thor

Originally posted by h1a8
prove that he's stronger. what feats of his seals the deal? Because as far as I'm concerned he only APPEARS stronger simply because of the hammer. Take that away and he wouldn't appear to be stronger than WW.

STFU with prove this sh** crap!! YOu cant prove sh**, you have faulty theories with no panel proof!

The hammer amps Thor's striking power and energy projection you f**king idiot read a damn comic! Where has Thor hammer, ever helped Thor lifting anything?

Thor has proven that he is stronger than Wonder Woman in lifting feats, that surpasses Wonder Woman. Thor is stronger, more experience, more durable,more versatile and more powerful than Wonder Woman, she might be more skilled in h2h, quicker that's it! Thor and Superman are peers, as where Wonder Woman is notch or 2 below them and that's a fact.

Originally posted by the Darkone
STFU with prove this sh** crap!! YOu cant prove sh**, you have faulty theories with no panel proof!

The hammer amps Thor's striking power and energy projection you f**king idiot read a damn comic! Where has Thor hammer, ever helped Thor lifting anything?

Thor has proven that he is stronger than Wonder Woman in lifting feats, that surpasses Wonder Woman. Thor is stronger, more experience, more durable,more versatile and more powerful than Wonder Woman, she might be more skilled in h2h, quicker that's it! Thor and Superman are peers, as where Wonder Woman is notch or 2 below them and that's a fact.

Stop with the bashing ok. Debate with class.
My point is that people think Thor is stronger because of all the years of him hitting things with the hammer (which amps his strikes). It is an illusion to being stronger.

Thor has no lifting feats beyond WW. Do you even know WW's lifting feats? And he certainly has no striking feats without the hammer beyond her either.

Also using feats that are ancient for Thor even proves my point more. It shows that to prove Thor's worth one must get desperate and reach back into precrisis era. Although old ancient canon feats are fair game current characters levels hold more water since that is who we are debating about in the first place.

Originally posted by abhilegend
An elbow from wonder girl knocked the wind out of him.

Just a point of clarification...it appears to me that Wonder Girl didn't elbow him, she got him with a knee below the belt. In the last pane he's clutching his crotch.

This is actually a debatable thread imo and can.be shown to go many ways. One can lead to WW being equal to the strongest of the Heralds and one could lead to her being weaker. Looking at fts, she has aided in moving a moon, moving Earth, lifting mountains, entire bridges, etc, etc... Her fts are insane imo.

Originally posted by carver9
This is actually a debatable thread imo and can.be shown to go many ways. One can lead to WW being equal to the strongest of the Heralds and one could lead to her being weaker. Looking at fts, she has aided in moving a moon, moving Earth, lifting mountains, entire bridges, etc, etc... Her fts are insane imo.

Originally posted by h1a8
Stop with the bashing ok. Debate with class.
My point is that people think Thor is stronger because of all the years of him hitting things with the hammer (which amps his strikes). It is an illusion to being stronger.

Thor has no lifting feats beyond WW. Do you even know WW's lifting feats? And he certainly has no striking feats without the hammer beyond her either.

Also using feats that are ancient for Thor even proves my point more. It shows that to prove Thor's worth one must get desperate and reach back into precrisis era. Although old ancient canon feats are fair game current characters levels hold more water since that is who we are debating about in the first place.

Debate with some comic knowledge, which you don't period!!
You have yet to prove anything, all thing you have is your faulty theories that don't mean sh**, unless you panel feats to support your claim.

You talk more bullsh** than a US Senator

Thor does have lifting feat to say other wise once again shows your complete ignorance of comic characters and their history which is nothing new, you have been wrong over and over again by other members who have pointed this out, we cant all be wrong if we all agree, against you 😉 !

Thor has feats that equals to WW or surpasses, same thing with Superman. Superman and Thor are peers by feats, while Wonder Woman is notch below them, stop being so damn bias against Marvel characters and read some comics with comprehension and context, you mite learn something.

Originally posted by the Darkone
Debate with some comic knowledge, which you don't period!!
You have yet to prove anything, all thing you have is your faulty theories that don't mean sh**, unless you panel feats to support your claim.

You talk more bullsh** than a US Senator

Thor does have lifting feat to say other wise once again shows your complete ignorance of comic characters and their history which is nothing new, you have been wrong over and over again by other members who have pointed this out, we cant all be wrong if we all agree, against you 😉 !

Thor has feats that equals to WW or surpasses, same thing with Superman. Superman and Thor are peers by feats, while Wonder Woman is notch below them, stop being so damn bias against Marvel characters and read some comics with comprehension and context, you mite learn something.

Yet you are aren't proving anything either.
What you going to give me, the serpent feat? Not only is that ancient and not representative of modern Thor but a desperate move that shows you have nothing better. But that feat alone doesn't quite give him the nod either. WW Helping tow planets and moons isn't worst IMO.

Also Superman is several levels above Thor in strength feats. Even on average Superman just appears stronger in comics. Thor sometimes appears close to Superman in strength because of the hammer. It's an illusion. So why do you say they are peers?

I'm not bias against Marvel characters. I just know the truth,...most of the time.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yet you are aren't proving anything either.
What you going to give me, the serpent feat? Not only is that ancient and not representative of modern Thor but a desperate move that shows you have nothing better. But that feat alone doesn't quite give him the nod either. WW Helping tow planets and moons isn't worst IMO.

Also Superman is several levels above Thor in strength feats. Even on average Superman just appears stronger in comics. Thor sometimes appears close to Superman in strength because of the hammer. It's an illusion. So why do you say they are peers?

I'm not bias against Marvel characters. I just know the truth,...most of the time.

Your truth is so damn twisted in your mind, its not even funny!!
You nick pick, misrepresent feats to prove illogical points, if the character doesn't have feats that you want, you will dismiss that character as a whole and called them weak.

The World Engine, Physically resisting a scores a planets by Umar, Midgard Serpent,lifting the Odin/ Over-sword weight unknown, hitting Korg brother so hard sent him flying through earths solar system, resisting the weigh of a half planet. Superman and Thor are very close in strength, to say other wise is bias and ignorant on the highest order, Superman appears "keyword: appears" stronger but he is not, they are equals, they are depicted differently, because Thor doesn't have the lifting feats of Superman,doesn't mean superman is stronger than Thor.

Infinity Man is stronger than both Orion and Superman and he has zero lifting feats, and Orion and Superman are equals in strength.