Originally posted by JuntaiNo, you didn't you use other instances other under writers under different circumstances. I used the same situation in which a clear comparison was made. Earth 22 didn't move an inch. New earth went flying backwards. That's as definitive as it gets. You can change your aggression but your durability isn't going to change. I am responding to another one of your cheapshots. Funny how when I respond to a post where you throw my name in there I am the one trying to incite you.
I never said that, you made that wild comparison. However, I already backed up my statement and gave clear-cut examples regarding Superman's mood change and his ability and durability, under circumstance versus his normal levels.Your whole stance was terrible and you were proven wrong over and over again in the thread until a mod had to stop your trolling.
Now run along and quit trying to incite me just because you know I'm reading some of your posts.
Originally posted by Galan007I didn't say it was a low showing I said he couldn't survive a blast from Imperiex Prime on his own. Delta said he did. Pointing out the context of the situation doesn't mean it's a low showing. Funny thing is I give Superman a slight edge in durability. 🙂
Only quanchi would think it a low showing for Superman to not be able to survive a blast of entropy. facepalm
Originally posted by Galan007
Some of Imperiex's blast hit Supes--that's why he was 'burning'. However, Darkseid transported Superman away from said blast, just before he was killed by it. All of this was explicitly stated:
Considering entropy is essentially DC's version of ultimate nullification, it certainly isn't surprising that Supes would have been destroyed by Imperiex's entropy blast.
Originally posted by Galan007At no point did I say it was a low showing I just said my examples were of Thor tanking blasts on his own while this example of delta's was not the same thing. Delta also thinks Superman blows him out of the water in durability which is just ridiculous.
Considering entropy is essentially DC's version of ultimate nullification, it certainly isn't surprising that Supes would have been destroyed by Imperiex's entropy blast.
Originally posted by carver9
Against blunt force...Thor is more durable.Against energy attacks, they are probably equals.
Against Sharpnel, Superman is more durable.
Originally posted by Galan007He turned this into an overall best vs. best feats. I think it's just common sense looking at it overall on average Superman is slightly more durable. I despise ne Superman but I am giving him his due. That's being fair.
I'm saying your arguments are ridiculous in general (both of you.)Why argue Supes vs. entropy in the first place?
Originally posted by abhilegend
What feat of thor does make you believe that he takes blunt force better than superman? What feat of his eclipses superman surviving two planets at least thousands of times bigger than earth colliding?
Superman was koed by those Planet colliding and it happened off panel.
