Originally posted by Delta1938
Considering he survived a similar blast that killed Doomsday, it is impressive. I never argued he would've survived it indefinitely.If it is, that kinda contradicts that Galactus was afraid of it being used against him. Similar to your argument that Superman was being burned by the Sun to "prove" he was blasted into the Sun. Also, it doesn't change the fact that you're still using Character X not using his/her/it's full power against Superman to dismiss the feat, but ignoring that Character Y didn't use full power attacks against Thor.
Now where did I ever say that Superman tanked the blast? Superman survived a similar sized blast for what appeared to be a similar duration as Doomsday and survived. That's impressive. Not surviving it indefinitely is irrelevant, especially because I never said he tanked it.
Yes, it is a double standard. Superman surviving Imperiex Prime's blast isn't impressive because Imperiex Prime wasn't using his full power, yet Thor surviving Odin's attack is impressive, even though Odin didn't use Galaxy-Busting Force to attack. That's the entire argument you've been making, it's a text book example of a double standard.
Oh, but I am right. Normally I don't like using the "Appeal To The Majority" argument, but the fact is that nobody has agreed with you that Superman was blasted into the Sun, and for a reason. That's not what happened. Not only are they disagreeing with you, but some have provided scans to show that you're wrong. This looks like a case where you're EMBARRASSINGLY wrong and refuse to admit it, 'cuz you can't possibly fathom ever being wrong. Much like expunging bacteria on Doomsday. You notice, nobody agrees with you there on taking it literally, either.
I didn't post anything out of context. If I make the scans myself, I include the full context. It's one thing to argue me misinterpreting something, but I wouldn't post something out of context intentionally unless I'm making a point. And when I do that, I make it CLEAR I'm making a point. I had the full fight between Superman and Emperor Joker there.
And by your argument, why should I trust any of your scans? You've already proven multiple times that at best for you, you're misinterpreting what happened. And you stick to it even when you've CLEARLY been proven wrong, which implies flat-out dishonesty on your part.
Except, I didn't leave-out any context. I pointed-out, Superman took the blast of a similar size for what appeared to be a similar duration of what Doomsday took. You saying I said Superman tanked the blast when I didn't say it doesn't mean I'm leaving-out context or drawing a false comparison. I could always just say you're a liar and making-up me saying he tanked it to bolster your argument against me, but you wouldn't like that, would you? Much like I don't like being accused of purposely posting things out of context.
Making "scrap books of Hulk scans" makes me homosexual? I guess you ARE in the closest and the desperation of hiding it makes you throw logic out the window worse than usual.
You asked if anyone considers my jokes funny. AND you asked for a serious answer. I gave a serious answer. And how does it being the Internet and "just comic book debating" mean you're not a hypocrite? Maybe you aren't offline, but you've clearly been using double standards left and right here.
But an argument could be made that "looking at Thor fts against Abstracts similar to Imperiex, Thor probably could have survived the attack without any outside interference. Hell, looking at Thor fts, not only would he have probably survived it, he probably would have had enough energy and power to do a counter attack. Again, that's looking at Thor showings against similar beings (he has even damaged beings in Imperiex tier).
