JakeTheBank
Return of the King
Originally posted by Batman-Prime
Keep it shorter, it's almost to long.I'm saying that going by the feats of the Heralds listed and the feats of Odin, I don't see him oneshooting them.
By KMC they are high Heralds. Their feats put them, well, above imho. It's jobbing if they took worse from greater beings then Odin and were oneshooted by him, simple, really. And if it's now a vast majority we are making progress, at least. As for Krona, well he took down Galactus quite easy, where Odin, well headbutted himself for an ko. 😐 Hal having the willpower and a weapon based on willpower and the feats and intent to kill, it counts for nothing, yeah I forgot. They face him also one at a time, because they are polite...
Yeah, well, sorry, but I don't subscribe to the idea that if you just throw a skyfather (even Odin) against a number of some of the best high heralds, he gets an autowin, just because he is a Skyfather, not when said high heralds repeatedly showed themselves to be beyond high heralds while holding back or weakened. That's a terrible line of thought to apply, especially here.
So maybe we agree here. Some of the people on the list aren't high heralds then, rather Trans or low Skyfathers, and Odin loses. 👆
And yes, Skyfathers are overrated here, because they get the win because of their status and not because of their feats. Standard procedure.
That's what she said. *zing*
Yeah, but going by the feats of Odin (the ones shown in comics), he actually...y'know...one-shots heralds. And he does it without exerting much effort or while weakened or some other circumstance that prevents him from going all out, in which case, he'd outright obliterate herald level beings. 😐
Or they could be high end feats. Thor was once able to endure a barrage of blasts from multiple Celestials. Do I think that's the norm for Thor? Hell no, that's insane and it was clearly designed to be an epic heroic moment. That's what I'm getting at here. You can't pick out a handful to a dozen of good feats compare them to the overwhelming majority of feats under a character's history and just decide that everything else besides those high end feats was "jobbing" or "PIS". That doesn't even make a lick of sense. It's just as bad as trying to lowball a character by citing gas stations exploding or being mugged by Mexicans or falling down stairs or being shot and KOd with a sniper round; its just as inaccurate a portrayal of a character's overall formidability and capabilities albeit on the other far side of the spectrum.
Krona beating down Galactus? JLA/Avengers Krona =/= Krona from War of the Green Lanterns. That's common sense. And no, you can't arbitrarily decide that Hal can kill whomever just because of his willpower, which by its very nature, fluctuates depending on the situation at hand. No one's trying to lowball Hal here, so don't act like it.
Odin doesn't get an autowin because he's a skyfather. He wins because he's more powerful than anyone here and quite a few people here are virtually useless here against him. And that's based on feats and portrayals.
What gets me here is this.
Some of the people on the list aren't high heralds then, rather Trans or low Skyfathers, and Odin loses. 👆
And yes, Skyfathers are overrated here, because they get the win because of their status and not because of their feats. Standard procedure.
Who here is Trans or Low Skyfather for one? And for another, where in the world do you get that Odin gets the win here because of his status and not his feats? Because I, alongside several others, have outright stated and cited his actual feats done on panel? And how is this line of thought "standard procedure"? Do you think there's some kind of pro-skyfather/anti-herald movement on KMC?