CosmicComet
Senior Member
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I'm frustrated that you think Superman's flight somehow detracts from Superman's strength. It's a retarded theory. It doesn't even matter unless we're speaking of some KMC contest where Superman must lift things and he cannot fly. Of course, considering your half-stepping hypocrisy, doubt you'd be the first to jump in that thread and point out this moron theory.
Of course you are frustrated. You aren't fooling anyone when the post originally came across as a mewling, whiny attempt at deflecting the issue to possible hypocrisy with how some of Superman's feats are looked at in comparison to the Hulk;
"Yeah, that's what people said about nearly all of Superman's impressive strength feats which almost invariably involve flight save for one or two feats. Forgive my disbelief.
Let's change "Hulk strongest there is!!!" to "Hulk most energy projectiony there is!!!" 🙄 "
WAHHH YOU ARE SO UNFAIR TO HULKY WAHH. Sorry. That's all I see.
So don't try to take some half-baked disaffected, neutral, high ground stance here by saying you are now frustrated because I'm 'low balling' Superman now or something. That's not what you care about. And it's a joke to even attempt to portray yourself as such.
You were hoping to somehow use the logic against me, in order to call me a hypocrite, but I've provided equal critiques on how both ends; both Superman and Hulk, have feats that questionably cannot be called pure strength alone, and now you're STILL trying to call me a hypocrite. I guess you were just really set on using the word hypocrite today. 😂
It's a 'moron' theory now eh? Certainly didn't seem that was the stance you were taking in the quote I put up there, it certainly smacked of some sort of appeal to popularity fallacy attempt at questioning unfairness in appraisal of feats between two characters. I guess they were all morons as well then, eh? If they were, what was the point of even bringing it up? Because in the end, I could concede that both showings could be 'pure strength', but that unfortunately would change nothing on my end would it? As I would still have reasons to compare Superman's strength favorably to Hulk. So I guess what I'm trying to understand is; 'what the phuck is your point this whole time?' You're just flip flopping hard.
Anyway, we're going off on a tangent now, but you wouldn't be able to even explain why its a 'moron' theory anyway. All you ever seem to do these days is complain that things are 'stupid' or 'dumb' and try to portray yourself as this disillusioned intellectual that never has to explain himself on that front, on top of, you know, doing the same ol' bitter WAHHH HULK IS TREATED UNFAIRLY routine like you did in that Doomsday thread a week or two back. You're not convincing anyone of this shit. Explain, One *Dumb* Go, how its 'moron' theory when everything I said is true?; Flight is an extra-capability that doesn't come from muscle power.
(Again, not that it matters, since like said already, Superman does crazy shit even outside of flight related pulling feats)
Nowhere near the damage being done like in World War Hulk except the same lil old couple in Greenwich, Connecticut was commenting on the same tremors again (only this time Hulk was in Washington D.C. and not in Manhattan). You're trying to convince me that the damage WBH did in World War Hulk was not similar to the damage done in World War Hulks? They got John Romita Jr to come back for a single page to illustrate the similarity:World War Hulk #5:
Incredible Hulks #610:
Except where pure strength did what so-called part-strength and part-energy projection did. Do yourself a favor. Give it up. [/B]
I'm not trying to convince you of anything but that;
The gamma energy he leaks out is confirmed on panel to do damage to the surroundings by itself, even when Hulk is not moving.
Therefore, the feats CANNOT, by logic, be purely strength based. Not when he releases energy when he's ramping up his strength levels and that energy is confirmed to cause damage itself.
