Originally posted by Silent Master
Some people consider cheap shotted and taken by surprise to be the same thing, when talking about attacks happening when the characters aren't already in the middle of a fight....so I can see why FrothByte used that term.It's telling that certain people are trying to pass off that encounter as indicative of how an actual fight would do, when we know from the both movies that Loki likes using ranged attacks and illusions during his fights.
They do much the same thing when they ignore that Thor was shown to fight his brother/allies differently than he does enemies.
I do agree with Robtard there isn't much Loki could have done there, and that he might just been stalling or having a hissy fit moment.
I don't think this is too much less Loki could hav done to change the outcome. Of course if Thor was serious he would have done the same thing to Loki.
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, talk about strawmanning. Hypocrisy FTW.
How is strawmanning? Thor has been documented as holding back.
In the Thor film Loki sent the Destroyer to kill him, Blasted Thor out of the Palace, was threatening to destroy an entire planet, and even hit him the face with Odin's Spear yet Thor STILL wouldn't fight him.
It took Loki threatening Jane for Thor to finally fight his brother, and even during the middle of it when it looked like Loki was about to fall off the Bi-Frost Thor stopped to help him up.
Does that really sound like Thor was going all out on Loki. He was obviously holding back, even if he was putting effort into it there's no way he's giving it his all cause he doesn't want to hurt Loki.