im happy that you are finally exploring the perils of fallacious comments in a discussion and hope you one day find the humility to apply it to your own statements. for instance, this:
Originally posted by dadudemon
If your ego is not too big, you should then apologize to me.
...is a false dilemma.
anyway, by declaring that you needed the other side of the story, that left only 2 possible implications:
1-her cheating may have been justified/cheating can sometimes be justified.
2-the story was a lie or contained some fabrication/she did not cheat at all.
granted he jumped the gun and assumed you took position 1. however this is not strawman.
strawman is the fallacy of misrepresenting one's position in order to create an effigy. its done in order to sell others on your own position.
you just want to apply it to each and every misunderstanding or misinterpreting of someone's statement or position. (which you seem never able to express without surrounding it in an essay of wild irrelevancy that few bother to translate). you use it so broadly and inappropriately that a conversation can go like this:
ddm: man i stubbed my toe this morning
me: well, you should look where you're walking.
ddm: STRAWMAN!!! i wasnt walking. a book landed on my foot.