Sebastion Shaw (Movie) V.S. Thor (Movie)

Started by Blight7 pages

I don't THINK he'd have a problem. But it's based on the fact that he hasn't shown any problem doing any of the things he did. And it's not as if he said "Thank god this Nuclear reactor is leaking at a pace I can absorb!"

Again. Opinion.

Well, we know Shaw's container was capable of housing the power of a nuclear reactor... So unless Thor hit him with an attack superior to that, I don't see Shaw being overloaded.

Imo, if Iron Man can scrap with Thor/tank all of his attacks, Shaw can do the same.

Originally posted by Galan007
Well, we know Shaw's container was capable of housing the power of a nuclear reactor... So unless Thor hit him with an attack superior to that, I don't see Shaw being overloaded.

Imo, if Iron Man can scrap with Thor/tank all of his attacks, Shaw can do the same.

Iron Man was definitely weaker than Thor and did not tank all of his attacks.

But as for this fight it's just Shaw has such a broken power it's kind of crazy.

There is not one thing Thor did that took Tony out of the fight for longer than a second or two. Not one thing. That's what I meant by "tanked."

^ I think he means if Iron Man's suit can absorb Thor's full on Lightning blast (because it powered the suit up) then chances are Shaw could do the same.

Originally posted by Galan007
There is not one thing Thor did that took Tony out of the fight for longer than a second or two. Not one thing. That's what I meant by "tanked."
Yeah but I think when Thor showed himself being able to crush Tony's armor with his bare hands, it showed that if Thor wanted to he could have taken Tony out.

And Tony's armor is fairly durable. I rewatched Ironman 2 yesterday and surviving Vanko's whips is really good considering they cut through race cars like a hot knife through butter.

Originally posted by Newjak
Yeah but I think when Thor showed himself being able to crush Tony's armor with his bare hands, it showed that if Thor wanted to he could have taken Tony out.
There was no implication that Thor was holding back.

Either way, I'm not saying Tony isn't durable. Just saying that I don't see Shaw having a problem absorbing everything Tony endured.

Originally posted by Blight
I don't THINK he'd have a problem. But it's based on the fact that he hasn't shown any problem doing any of the things he did. And it's not as if he said "Thank god this Nuclear reactor is leaking at a pace I can absorb!"

Again. Opinion.

But on the other hand, Shaw was never hit with any attack that was even close to what Thor was able to dish out.

Originally posted by Galan007
There was no implication that Thor was holding back.

Either way, I'm not saying Tony isn't durable. Just saying that I don't see Shaw having a problem absorbing everything Tony endured.

I can agree with that.