Thor Vs Gladiator

Started by country100027 pages

Originally posted by red sabre
Country got raped by leonidas
And what a rape it was too!! Leo is defending statements and showings from beings that are not real and have zero control over the outcome of a battle between made up heros or bad guys, while poor ole country is using statements from real living beings that write the story and control ALL the actions of the make-believe characters. In other words, gladiator, thor and no other character controls themselves. Their EVERY action is controlled by living writers that have stated that comic book battles are decided by hero status and not by power sets. The hero is WRITTEN to win and live to face the next threat. He raped himself dude, but birds of a feather will always flock together. He raped himself dude.

So we agree that Thor wins, then, right?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
So we agree that Thor wins, then, right?
He will win in a comic unless they make thor the bad guy and little used and make gladiator the popular hero. Thor would also lose in a non-biased forum battle.

Originally posted by country1000
He will win in a comic unless they make thor the bad guy and little used and make gladiator the popular hero. Thor would also lose in a non-biased forum battle.

You were so close. Don't worry, you can still be saved.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
You were so close. Don't worry, you can still be saved.
Yeah thanks, save the writers too.

Originally posted by country1000
Yeah thanks, save the writers too.

All who open their hearts and minds to me will be saved.

Except Carver. I'm no miracle worker.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
All who open their hearts and minds to me will be saved.

Except Carver. I'm no miracle worker.

Yeah i know, you dont like carvers beliefs about certain characters being above other certain characters. Makes perfect sense that you bring up his name. For a character thats not real, gladiator sure gets your goat. hail superman!! lol. Later dude.

Originally posted by country1000
Yeah i know, you dont like carvers beliefs about certain characters being above other certain characters. Makes perfect sense that you bring up his name. For a character thats not real, gladiator sure gets your goat. hail superman!! lol. Later dude.

Y'know, you're only person here who seems to think I, of all people, am a huge Superman mark. Which is really funny to me.

Originally posted by country1000
And what a rape it was too!! Leo is defending statements and showings from beings that are not real and have zero control over the outcome of a battle between made up heros or bad guys, while poor ole country is using statements from real living beings that write the story and control ALL the actions of the make-believe characters. In other words, gladiator, thor and no other character controls themselves. Their EVERY action is controlled by living writers that have stated that comic book battles are decided by hero status and not by power sets. The hero is WRITTEN to win and live to face the next threat. He raped himself dude, but birds of a feather will always flock together. He raped himself dude.

Great post! But it is WE who must pick out what instances are legit and which ones are not. The ones that shouldn't be legit are the ones where the writer have a character forgetting a main power and ability (such as speed and reflexes) for no sound reason. That's why I say that it is not who wins that holds water but how did they won is what holds the water.

Lazy debaters only use the fact that a character beat another while not considering how they beat them. The outcome of a comic fight is meaningless unless the character's were both shown to be fighting at their best WITHIN REASON.

country1000, you were barely allowed on this forum in the first due to you most likely being a sock that was dealt with before. But you were given a chance.

You're throwing it away like a used condom, dude. Seriously, the attitude needs to stop. You follow the rules or debating, or you just don't debate.

Writers make mistakes. Are we to simply follow what they write, country1000?

Originally posted by country1000
And what a rape it was too!! Leo is defending statements and showings from beings that are not real and have zero control over the outcome of a battle between made up heros or bad guys, while poor ole country is using statements from real living beings that write the story and control ALL the actions of the make-believe characters. In other words, gladiator, thor and no other character controls themselves. Their EVERY action is controlled by living writers that have stated that comic book battles are decided by hero status and not by power sets. The hero is WRITTEN to win and live to face the next threat. He raped himself dude, but birds of a feather will always flock together. He raped himself dude.

Wrong sir, first of all writers sort of follow the same rules established in wrestling storyline by writers when creating characters which are:introduction of character,his background power,feats and character jobs to promote said character/villian. Writers have to establish said characters Power base and maintain some level of consistency and respect for character personality and abilities in order to have a bases established which from that we argue the battle possibilities. Yes writers usually take liberalities within a fictional character but usually its catalogued as non-canon,alternate reality and etc. canonical stories can have alterations and boost or reduce a characters ranking, when new writers give their interpretation of said character which we call revamped,retelling or remake of character but they still have to usually have to respect original source of material and established character in order to be somewhat consistent and show respect for the ppl invested in the mythos. now then heros/villians don't always win and when it contradics what has already been established whether wis,pis or cis its usually well established even by the writers to move the plot of the story. heck if you want logic then comics aren't for you because logically superman would beat a villain in two panels or less. Now with all that said and done like wrestling forums we debate characters based on a few factors including powersets, abilities,feats, characters behavior and whether were using canonical,noncanonical and such.
now we take all that established to make the best possible guess and assumptions of the outcome of the battle with logic,reasoning and circumstances of the situation even though ironically comics usually don't follow any. Now we know the hero wins thats not the factor in debating in forums we usually take the logical approach even writers admitted hulk would lose to juggernuat but for sakes of story he usually wins. Thus companies established all these bases and factors knowing we love to debate and big word here SPECULATE the outcome of a battle as best as possible and the only way is by reading whats established through comics not what writers say because like said logically juggernuat beats hulk but as established in comics through feats and all we usually know hulk trumps him in debate forums. Good day sir! 🍺

Originally posted by h1a8
Great post! But it is WE who must pick out what instances are legit and which ones are not. The ones that shouldn't be legit are the ones where the writer have a character forgetting a main power and ability (such as speed and reflexes) for no sound reason. That's why I say that it is not who wins that holds water but how did they won is what holds the water.

You can't just pick and chose which fights you like and which you don't. In this case, High herald speedsters have used their speed against Thor. It just wasn't portrayed in the way you would like it to be.

But it's happened too often and too consistently to be considered PIS. It's just the rules of comics concerning Thor vs speedsters.

Originally posted by h1a8
Lazy debaters only use the fact that a character beat another while not considering how they beat them. The outcome of a comic fight is meaningless unless the character's were both shown to be fighting at their best WITHIN REASON.

In comics both characters rarely fight at their very best.

And we've told you time and time again the kind of power and versatility Thor could show if fighting at his very best. That's not something that only benefits high level speedsters.

If this was Gladiator vs Hulk then you'd have a good argument. Their one fight could be counted as PIS'ish, with Gladiator's speed not really used and Hulk having no versatility or extra power set to deal with such.

But with Gladiator vs Thor?? Your playing the speed card in a whole different league.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
You can't just pick and chose which fights you like and which you don't. In this case, High herald speedsters have used their speed against Thor. It just wasn't portrayed in the way you would like it to be.
When High Heralds used their speed against Thor it didn't look good for him. When they didn't use their speed against him it didn't look good for them.

With that said, Not only can we pick and choose within reason but everyone already does (EVERYONE here does). Characters have full capacity here and there is no mentioning of PIS. That alone allows us to pick and choose.
Spider-man beating Hulk with a random machine with gamma rays has nothing to do with what will happen in a forum fight. Thus we choose not to use that scene as proof that Spidey can beat Hulk. I can go on and on but I think you should get my point now.


But it's happened too often and too consistently to be considered PIS. It's just the rules of comics concerning Thor vs speedsters.
Often and consistently are irrelevant and subjective terms. Just because a character doesn't use their speed against Thor in comics doesn't mean that they won't in a forum fight. Many here are trying to make forum fights into 100% comic fights (or what will happen in a comic book).


In comics both characters rarely fight at their very best.
Again this is subjective (most non speedsters fight at their best or close). Also fighting at one's best implies MAIN POWERS (not rare exotic ones). Speedsters rarely fight at their best because EVERYONE KNOWS (even the writer) that if they did then not only would they be highly unbeatable but they would win too quick.

And we've told you time and time again the kind of power and versatility Thor could show if fighting at his very best. That's not something that only benefits high level speedsters.
Speed is greater than versatility and power. What good are those things if you don't have the time necessary to use them properly (or at all)?

If this was Gladiator vs Hulk then you'd have a good argument. Their one fight could be counted as PIS'ish, with Gladiator's speed not really used and Hulk having no versatility or extra power set to deal with such.
But CONSISTENTLY Thor has fought Hulk and other relatively slow beings while both were basically almost the same speed in combat against each other. Remember that versatility or extra power is not very effective against someone using great speed against you. Also, I can argue that since there exist a real character reason why Thor don't use his versatility much (he is a warrior that loves to fight) and while Glads don't use his speed because of writer's preference (not because of his character) means that in a typical forum fight Thor pretty much is not going to be very versatile against someone like Glads (just hammer throws, lightning, and melee) while Glads is going to use his speed.

But with Gladiator vs Thor?? Your playing the speed card in a whole different league.
Why does speed trumps all? Because it has a time manipulation element in it. Speed allows one to purposely slow down their opponent giving the speedster a huge advantage.

Originally posted by country1000
!! Leo is defending statements and showings from beings that are not real and have zero control over the outcome of a battle between made up heros or bad guys,

😂

you mean, wait, the characters in a story........DON'T write themselves?? 😑

damn, who knew....? that's.....quite a revelation. and with that quantum leap of logic, you have proven yourself the equal in intelligence of my daughter's pet fish. bravo i actually had odds on the fish. 👆

writers tell stories THROUGH characters. nice job of ignoring all the DEAD HEROES AGAIN!!!! 😂 not protected by hero status i guess.....

nice job of limiting writers to ONLY HAVING THE HERO WIN EVERYTIME!!1! and superman didn't die either.....

nice job of ignoring the SUCCESS of superman's death. of cap marvel's death. nice job of INFINITELY overstating the impact of having gladiator beat thor in a fight. nice job of ignoring the fact that glads doesn't have to kill him, only BEAT him, then thor could come back and whoop him, again. nice job of ignoring the fact that thor has been ko'd and beaten a few times just LATELY!!1!! but....who the hell can THAT have happened??? heroes are written to NEVER LOSE!!1! nice job of ignoring the 95% of my post you couldn't reply to.

you're argument truly is the stupidest argument i have ever seen in my time here. if it's all so preordained, stop reading comics (hrm, that implies you STARTED reading them at some point....), and gawd, PLEASE stop posting here.

Originally posted by leonidas
😂

you mean, wait, the characters in a story........DON'T write themselves?? 😑

damn, who knew....? that's.....quite a revelation. and with that quantum leap of logic, you have proven yourself the equal in intelligence of my daughter's pet fish. bravo i actually had odds on the fish. 👆

writers tell stories THROUGH characters. nice job of ignoring all the DEAD HEROES AGAIN!!!! 😂 not protected by hero status i guess.....

nice job of limiting writers to ONLY HAVING THE HERO WIN EVERYTIME!!1! and superman didn't die either.....

nice job of ignoring the SUCCESS of superman's death. of cap marvel's death. nice job of INFINITELY overstating the impact of having gladiator beat thor in a fight. nice job of ignoring the fact that glads doesn't have to kill him, only BEAT him, then thor could come back and whoop him, again. nice job of ignoring the fact that thor has been ko'd and beaten a few times just LATELY!!1!! but....who the hell can THAT have happened??? heroes are written to NEVER LOSE!!1! nice job of ignoring the 95% of my post you couldn't reply to.

you're argument truly is the stupidest argument i have ever seen in my time here. if it's all so preordained, stop reading comics (hrm, that implies you STARTED reading them at some point....), and gawd, PLEASE stop posting here.


He's not worth it leo. Calm down.

😂

that WAS calm.... 🙂

Originally posted by h1a8
When High Heralds used their speed against Thor it didn't look good for him. When they didn't use their speed against him it didn't look good for them.

Lol High Heralds have always used their speed against Thor. Yes they get their licks in using their speed, but every time Thor reacts in time. And usually wins as well.

Originally posted by h1a8

Spider-man beating Hulk with a random machine with gamma rays has nothing to do with what will happen in a forum fight.

When Thor uses a special weapon to defeat the likes of Gladiator or Surfer then talk.

Originally posted by h1a8
Again this is subjective (most non speedsters fight at their best or close). Also fighting at one's best implies MAIN POWERS (not rare exotic ones). Speedsters rarely fight at their best because EVERYONE KNOWS (even the writer) that if they did then not only would they be highly unbeatable but they would win too quick.

Well someone forgot to tell Stan Lee that who felt Surfer needed to be amped to even challenge Thor.

Originally posted by h1a8
Speed is greater than versatility and power. What good are those things if you don't have the time necessary to use them properly (or at all)?

Thor has pretty damn fast reactions. No speedster (besides perhaps Flash) will be able to able to Combo to KO Thor before he can even think. He has pretty damn good durability and damage soak too.

Originally posted by h1a8
But CONSISTENTLY Thor has fought Hulk and other relatively slow beings while both were basically almost the same speed in combat against each other.

Yeah because he went Melee with them. He's always tried to prove he can take Hulk in a melee.

Originally posted by h1a8
Also, I can argue that since there exist a real character reason why Thor don't use his versatility much (he is a warrior that loves to fight) and while Glads don't use his speed because of writer's preference (not because of his character) means that in a typical forum fight Thor pretty much is not going to be very versatile against someone like Glads (just hammer throws, lightning, and melee) while Glads is going to use his speed.

No not at all. Thor always uses his powers when fighting Heralds.

Originally posted by h1a8
Why does speed trumps all? Because it has a time manipulation element in it. Speed allows one to purposely slow down their opponent giving the speedster a huge advantage.

Not so much against someone with goldy reflexes and speed perception himself. Not to mention Light speed attacks.

And btw in verses forums we discuss how these guys fight in comics. Not how we calculate they would fight in reality. It's the comic world these fights take place in. Not how you imagine it would happen in reality.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Lol High Heralds have always used their speed against Thor. Yes they get their licks in using their speed, but every time Thor reacts in time. And usually wins as well.

When Thor uses a special weapon to defeat the likes of Gladiator or Surfer then talk.

Well someone forgot to tell Stan Lee that who felt Surfer needed to be amped to even challenge Thor.

Thor has pretty damn fast reactions. No speedster (besides perhaps Flash) will be able to able to Combo to KO Thor before he can even think. He has pretty damn good durability and damage soak too.

What Stan Lee thinks is irrelevant. It has no bearing on who will win in a fight. We go by showings and not by writer's opinions. Do you even read Thor? There are no instances in comics where a speedster uses his top speed ON Thor and Thor reacts. All we have is Thor reacting to blasts from 30ft away. A baseball player can react and hit a 90mph straight fastball but will have a hard time reacting and hitting a 5mph buzzing fly from up close.

Yeah because he went Melee with them. He's always tried to prove he can take Hulk in a melee.

No not at all. Thor always uses his powers when fighting Heralds.

Yet he gets hit and creamed everytime he fights Hulk this way. Where is his speed and reflexes then?

Over 99% of the time Thor melees, throws the hammer, uses lightning, and block blasts. These are his main powers. He has others but rarely ever uses them in a one on one situation.

Not so much against someone with goldy reflexes and speed perception himself. Not to mention Light speed attacks.

Again his reflexes are shown blocking blasts, not defending against a speedster attacking him from up close. Remember the baseball fly analogy?

And btw in verses forums we discuss how these guys fight in comics. Not how we calculate they would fight in reality. It's the comic world these fights take place in. Not how you imagine it would happen in reality.
It's the opposite way around. This hobby was born from the spirit of fantasizing that the characters are fighting FOR REAL. This is why we love comics and often fantasize about having super powers, because we envision it as a reality.

Lastly, you don't make up forum rules or how we should debate. Forum rules are clear about Full Capacity. In the rules, it even goes so far as to give a clear example. I quote,
"For example, even though The Flash doesn't clock each of his own opponents in the first millisecond in his own COMIC it is assumed that is a viable tactic on this board SINCE IT IS A PROVEN FACT that HE POSSESSES THAT LEVEL OF SPEED."

@h1

They fight in character. This isn't powerset debating.