Jack Bauer vs John McClane

Originally posted by Lestov16
Pretty sure making a thread about a film character because he’s lived in similar hostage-rescue circumstances doesn’t count as exhibiting “spite”.

It does when based on your McClane/Bauer obsession you keep trying 'make a direct confrontation' in threads that don't have anything to do with a direct confrontation. I remember you doing this in 'Jack Bauer Runs the Die Hard Gauntlet'(which had nothing to do with a fight) and "McClane Luck Factor" (which also had nothing to do with a fight). You even brought Bourne in as well which was AGAIN, nothing to do with the threads. Let that sink in for a while. From this you revived the actual fight thread (finally, the right one) and then created the Air Force One scenario, hoping to trip up McClane.

What was next? I'm taking a wild guess here but I'm betting your next attempt would have been a- wait for it - another McClane thread, where if McClane trips up in any way you'll be sure to say 'ooooh Bauer/Bourne would soooo do that!'And you have history of this as you've proved in the threads mentioned above.

Pretty sure in the Gauntlet thread I showed that Bauer can easily run McClane’s gauntlet. Are you disagreeing with this? And if so, what evidence do you present to make your case?

I bought Bourne in to show my opponent’s bias and I succeeded 🙂

So any thread I make about McClane is some kind of spite thread? 😆

I’m sorry. I just thought McClane taking on the Radek loyalists would be a good match up. I should have just made some immature, absurdly biased match, like “Denton Van Zan vs Mary Poppins” or something 😂

Originally posted by Lestov16
Pretty sure in the Gauntlet thread I showed that Bauer can easily run McClane’s gauntlet. Are you disagreeing with this? And if so, what evidence do you present to make your case?

I bought Bourne in to show my opponent’s bias and I succeeded 🙂

So any thread I make about McClane is some kind of spite thread? 😆

I’m sorry. I just thought McClane taking on the Radek loyalists would be a good match up. I should have just made some immature, absurdly biased match, like “Denton Van Zan vs Mary Poppins” or something 😂

You probably did eventually get round to it, but not before Robtard called you out for spoiling for a direct fight between the two on it and you even admitted doing it. I left that particular thread because your only ally, Placidity, didn't like my comments about Bauer and accused me of lying (whilst ignoring what you were doing) so I have no idea what you wrote after in either of the two other threads.

Bourne had nothing to do with that thread. If you needed to bring in another character like Bourne that means you have no real faith in Bauer.

It is spite when you have ignored thread rules (in two threads) and spoiled for a fight then continue making McClane vs thread. It's classic spite behaviour, hoping for a slip-up then talking about how 'Bauer would have done this, Bauer would have done that'.

Maybe you should have then, good luck!

bye

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z
You probably did eventually get round to it.

All that matters

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z
Bourne had nothing to do with that thread

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z
It is spite when you have ignored posted screenfeats for a fight then continue asserting McClane will win. It's classic spite behaviour, hoping for a slip-up then talking about how McClane would have done this, McClane would have done that'.

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z
Maybe you should have then, good luck!

Originally posted by Lestov16

Like I stated, I did it to expose my opponent’s bias. And like I stated, I succeeded 🙂

So you support making immature spite threads? 😂

You mean you exposed yourself as someone with classic troll tendancies...and in that sense is where you 'did'.
The point was made, laughs were had, and from the statement you just made, sounds like you either missed the point, or it formed much, much of the Poppins equivalent of McButthurt within you.
(Poppin's pooper? Poopins? Poopain?)

Why are you calling it spite? Maybe some deliberate immaturity to match someone who forgets that this is MVF (a bit of fun that is also for debate to establish which of the fictional characters would likely 'win' in their confrontation) and declares someone with an opposing view must be declared an 'opponent'/enemy/person to be baited and trolled over ensuing multiple threads when the anti-McClane view is exposed to be flawed in the original thread and all subsequent ones too, by coincidence.
Why you've continued to do it is beyond reason. It must be masochism, combined with emulation of posters in the past who did exactly the same thing to the point where it is now wondered if you arent RJ, created the neccessity for fun here, after draining the forum of it by trolling with identi-variants of Potter VS SW and McClane threads, refusing to acknowledge rules or worse tried to amend them on the spot for the purposes of his rectally damaged crusade.
But spite? No. Its not that personal.

So you didn't say McClane could beat Jason Bourne? 😂

Are you saying the Van Zan vs Poppins thread wasn't a curbstomp spite thread (you even earlier stated "Poppins destroyed Van Zan) you made because you had Magic Mike on the mind after the McClane vs Van Zan thread?

Once again, I wasn't aware placing Mcclane against the Radek terrorists (because he's faced a smiliar situation) can be called a "spite thread", but hey if you are saying McClane can't handle the Radek terrorists, that's you 😉 . I thought McClane could do it....

And if you are saying that the Bauer vs McClane threads were spite threads, that means that you concede that Bauer can spite-stomp McClane

Either way, based on screenfeats, Bauer wins. When you come back with proof that isn't hypocritical bias, then we can actually debate further 🙂 .....

Originally posted by Lestov16
So you didn't say McClane could beat Jason Bourne? 😂

Are you saying the Van Zan vs Poppins thread wasn't a curbstomp spite thread (you even earlier stated "Poppins destroyed Van Zan) you made because you had Magic Mike on the mind after the McClane vs Van Zan thread?

Once again, I wasn't aware placing Mcclane against the Radek terrorists (because he's faced a smiliar situation) can be called a "spite thread", but hey if you are saying McClane can't handle the Radek terrorists, that's you 😉 . I thought McClane could do it....

And if you are saying that the Bauer vs McClane threads were spite threads, that means that you concede that Bauer can spite-stomp McClane

Either way, based on screenfeats, Bauer wins. When you come back with proof that isn't hypocritical bias, then we can actually debate further 🙂 .....

Sure...why not...?

These "well you must mean..." and working the false dilemma angle statements are pure fail. They mean nothing. I concede nothing. Pantomimic tomfoolery of that magnitude will never had it's ears open to reason.

Mary Poppins did thrash Van Zan. I made sure of that. 😉

That had to be some spoonful of sugar to help the medicine go down THAT day, for Van Zan...!

Yeah sugar. Lets call it that 😄

😂

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Sure...why not...?

My "McClane McWins with the McFries due to my McBias" and ignoring blatant presented evidence are pure fail. They mean nothing. I concede nothing. Pantomimic tomfoolery of my magnitude will never have it's ears open to reason.

Agreed entirely.

And considering that you don’t seem to have any more evidence to present to help McClane’s chances, then, based on screenfeats, Bauer wins 🙂

Originally posted by the ninjak
Mary Poppins did thrash Van Zan. I made sure of that. 😉

Indeed. Utter curbstomp thread made to spite a character. Hmm…..

You assume that that is the case, and you are wrong.

Said by the biased guy who hasn't seen the evidence 😂

Inadmissable evidence. It is for all intents and purpose EU and is thusly moot.

Mooted, I say....!!!

Moot.

Moot moot moot.

Moot!

Moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot moot .

So are you saying EU Bauer can beat McClane?

Nope. McClane could pop a potato chip bag near him at an awkward moment and Bauer would lose by having another death southpark Kenny style.

Or he could just shoot him/blow him up/drive a car into his anus..

Not based on feats. EU Bauer outclasses him on every level. I've posted proof

Nah...not really. Not that much there that would indicate he has what it takes to conclusively kill the unkillable.

McClane's not unkillable. His enemies are just incompetent dumbasses