Jack Bauer vs John McClane

Started by Lestov1651 pages

All I've done is post empirical feats and evidence. Not my fault people are choosing to ignore it. I've done nothing different than any other versus thread on this forum. My opponents have a bias

Which is why it's a circular debate. A snake eating its tail.

It's best to end these with a "guess we must agree to disagree" pact.

Only 3 of you are involved in this fight, but if you guys are having fun so be it. But I don't see this coming to a conclusion. Personally this fight also dangerously crosses into All-Versus Forum territory.

If McClane had a TV series I don't see it being all that different to 24.

You've done a good job debating Bauer though. But there is a reason why I choose to ignore such threads.

I understand how much this verges on AVF territory, but that is why I took measures to make sure there was no confusion. I made a video containing a good amount of his feats, and also listed them.

Would one not do the same on any other debate in this forum, if one of the posters said "I didn't see the movie, could you tell me his feats?" Wouldn't one post videos and such as empirical evidence? Can such evidence just be ignored because the poster has a bias?

Originally posted by the ninjak
Which is why it's a circular debate. A snake eating its tail.

Ouroboros.

Originally posted by the ninjak
I think this thread detracts from what makes the Movie Vs Forum fun.

Agreed, the tomfoolery has gone sour and it's turned ugly. Best to close, imo.

Sometimes you gotta forfeit....🙂

And note any ugliness came on you guys part. All I've done is post evidence

Come on, guy. You had meanness yourself. No hard feelings though.

Perhaps the thread has gotten a bit too serious......

(Bauer still retains victory though 🙂 )

Originally posted by Lestov16
All I've done is post empirical feats and evidence.

You have not posted "empirical feats". 😐

Originally posted by Lestov16
You still have yet to explain how McClane beats Bauer in anything, based on screenfeats, so....

Well its multilayered yet simple. McClane has lots of very impressive ones that qualify; Bauer doesn't.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You have not posted "empirical feats".

Originally posted by Lestov16
Perhaps the thread has gotten a bit too serious......

Thats like Michaelangelo stepping away from the Cistine chapel ceiling and saying: "Someones made that ceiling a bit too arty"

🙂

And DDM is actually right here, rightfully noting what has been said all along. ✅

At no point during that post did you state how McClane outclasses Bauer based on screenfeats. Then again, considering he doesn't, I could see where you would find some difficulty 😆

Based on screenfeats, Bauer wins, literally all day, every day

Hello world....meet the new RJ.

I just did. And the Die Hard Movies do.
(Twice as impressive by your standards to, as they are shown on both in movie theaters, AND on the TV - a format you think qualifies as legit here, rendering DH double the win in your world)

Bauer wins by screenfeats?
'Except he doesn't for a lack of them.'
(And Jack "weak ticker" Bauer cannot kill the unkillable, break the unbreakable. Which by screenfeats, McClane actually IS. )

But hey...ignore the big nasty men's evil words, and go back to believing that Bauer isn't simply a small screen McClane imitation. It will bring you happiness.
🙂

Originally posted by Placidity
Jack Bauer wins, not even close. 10/10 for Jack in all except maybe for the H2H fight, I'd say 9/10.
Originally posted by Odekahn
Ok this is laughable... Bauer roflstomps McClane. It's not even close.

And they are actually right here, rightfully noting what has been said all along 🙂

Not so, as they're wrong.

Besides: These guys have more movie screenfeats than Bauer:
YouTube video

Originally posted by Kazenji
Hello world....meet the new RJ.

Certainly seems that way.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
I just did. And the Die Hard Movies do.
(Twice as impressive by your standards to, as they are shown on both in movie theaters, AND on the TV - a format you think qualifies as legit here, rendering DH double the win in your world)

I don't give a phuck what the format is. I doubt you do either. It's just that you are so desperate for a win that you are willing to apply bootom-of-the-barrel debating tactics.

Sorry. Only thing John's taking is a "McLoss" here 🙂 (And no aspirin either)

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Bauer wins by screenfeats?
'Except he doesn't for a lack of them.'

So I can accept this as concession that you are ignoring Bauer's feats 🙂

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Bauer isn't simply a small screen McClane imitation.
🙂

Which is why McClane had to move on from fake terrorists to real ones in DH4, like some kind of Bauer imitation or something 😆

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Not so, as they're wrong.

Besides: These guys have more movie screenfeats than Bauer:

Why yes! Please do keep ignoring Bauer's feats! It definitely solidifies your argument 😂

No need to. The countering McArguments presented earlier sufficed plentifully.

Please do keep not knowing how to play the MVF game (IE Ignoring the rules...it may falsely give you hope in your own mind that a man who died three times due to a weak ticker is gonna have a chance against the unkillable McClane, a the most jammy bastard who ever lived, and who is skilled enough to kill everyone he faces, often in popcorntastic, thrilling, entertaining ways that keep putting asses on seats at the movie theater movie after movie..)

If ever a Bauer movie comes out it'll have to be called "Die Easy".. 🙂

Indeed. They did suffice. It was shown that Bauer will clearly manhandle McClane in eveyrhting, which is, of course, why you have went into "Feat-Ignoring" mode

None of that has anything to do with their actual screen feats.

And as far as durability goes, when did Bauer have to take a 15 minute time-out to whine to a fat cop?

And as far as "killing everyone they've encountered" is concerned, Bauer has a much higher killcount

Like I stated, just keep ignoring his feats 🙂. It is working wonders in making your argument believable 😂