Originally posted by juyomaster34
Hey Arhael,what's up. good point. Well its the practationer and what he or she adds to the style
to make it the best to them.I like the specific state of mind part. And the other part as well.Let me ask you a question. In my replies did confuse you?
Or did I question your curiosity?
If I didn't that 's okay too. I'm just trying to make my replies better.
To be honest didn't read everything. From recently I have too much work and too little time to go through everything.
No, I didn't get confused as I answered question for myself already but you brought some good points, which made me to share my insight.
Yes, newer styles were invented to counter weaknesses of older style.
But it doesn't really make newer ones better. Any combatant on finding weaknesses in his style would find ways to get read of them, so even Form I practitioner can learn to defend against any advanced Forms.
Techniques come only from first two Forms: two-handed techniques from Form I and one-handed techniques from Form II. The rest of the Forms bring only philosophy without actual techniques.
As for state of mind as you said Vaapad has to fit personality. Windu would never be able to reach full potential as pure lightsider because of his "badass" personality. But with Vaapad he could utilize his darkness and just be himself, thus reach his full potential during combat. This style would be completely unsutable for someone like Kenobi, Yoda or Luke.
In a way Vaapad indeed is inherently better style during Old Republic. Because Jedi could not be themselves. Instead of drawing on positive emotions they were taught to have no emotions at all. Vaapad power comes from relishing fight - it is a positive emotion, something Windu felt good about. So Windu was one step ahead of everyone else as he could just be himself and draw on positive emotions the fight itself was giving him.
Only with Luke's New Order this weakness was eliminated as he lifted no attachments rule, so Jedi could have much more positive emotions to draw on.