Originally posted by zopzop It's no more or less valid than what went on between Galactus/Other/Scrier. If you accept on you have to accept the other. Both are examples of sh|t writing though.
Nope, not the case at all. In the Galactus/Scrier/Other instance, we have nearly omniscient/abstract narrator observing the threat to the reality. A character with a vested interest in its cessation. Big difference. The omniscient narrator in the Odin/Seth instance never made such claims, only that long dead galaxies were destroyed and dying suns reignited.
For example :
Odin/Seth and Galactus/Scrier/Other, according to narration or third party, unleashed more power than the ENTIRE Cosmic Hierarchy during their assault on the IG wearers in the Infinity Gauntlet Saga. Death/Galactus/Stranger/Epoch/Love/Hate/2 Celestials/Order/Chaos/Kronos COMBINED attack vs an IG user didn't threaten a universe, let alone all reality.
Starlin has always had a more grounded view of the cosmic powerhouses. Also, the cosmics prepped for the war against the IG, a No Prize explanation would be that there were safeguards put into place to prevent the collapse of reality. Reality WAS nearly destroyed by Eternity/Infinity taking on the incomplete IG during Infinity War, however.
You really believe the Odin/Seth or Galactus/Scrier/Other throwdown was packing more power than the above example?
What I KNOW is that, from the perspective of Scrier/The Other/Oblivion, all characters with a high levels of cosmic awareness, the Galactus/Scrier/Other fight was straining reality to the point of breaking.
I forgot the sequence but I know Death fled after CK killed "Satan" but before he went on to devour Earth's pantheons.
See? Forgettable garbage. All DeMatteis did here is line Mikaboshi back up within the existing cosmic hierarchy. Mikaboshi was a retconned Oblivion, now Mikaboshi has been retconned back into his rightful position.