Originally posted by Bardock42
But you would be eliminating a lot of the cost of health care you have right now. Both pharma industries and doctors would be taking a (well deserved) cut.
Noticing those benefits will take 5-10 years to realize. Even then, we still will not lower our costs, per person, to France's level, any time soon.
Originally posted by Bardock42
If this is to be believe in 2009 it's $4000. To put that in perspective it is more than DOUBLE what France pays (by total expenditure of GDP it is 47% more.
The number I am referring to is something like...what the government spends, not the total or whatever.
Originally posted by Bardock42
At any rate I don't see any reason why cost would increase by half the military spending.
Well, we could not implement systems like that and spend the same ratios for several reasons:
We have more people, our standard of living is higher, and higher base medical costs (which will take decades to finally level out).
Originally posted by Bardock42
You'd have to reroute the current private spending into taxation of course, the money has to come from somewhere.
The rich.
Yeah...the rich. mwhahahahahaaaaa
Originally posted by Bardock42
But can't you also see russia from your house?
its like 4000 km from my house...
Originally posted by Bouboumaster
Man, I never say that I'm all in with Canada's military budget. The F-35 fiasco is a joke.
the plane that has no practical use for our military, wont work in the arctic and that we have no idea about the overall cost of...
If you look at the link I gave Lord Lucien, it describes 5-6 other projects that are essentially in the exact same place. We are trying to acquire a bunch of new equipment, and all of it is bogged down with delays and problems.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Noticing those benefits will take 5-10 years to realize. Even then, we still will not lower our costs, per person, to France's level, any time soon.The number I am referring to is something like...what the government spends, not the total or whatever.
Well, we could not implement systems like that and spend the same ratios for several reasons:
We have more people, our standard of living is higher, and higher base medical costs (which will take decades to finally level out).
The rich.
Yeah...the rich. mwhahahahahaaaaa
I reject your assessment of the situation!
Originally posted by inimalist
its like 4000 km from my house...the plane that has no practical use for our military, wont work in the arctic and that we have no idea about the overall cost of...
If you look at the link I gave Lord Lucien, it describes 5-6 other projects that are essentially in the exact same place. We are trying to acquire a bunch of new equipment, and all of it is bogged down with delays and problems.
And I totally agree with that.
If I was the PM, I'd cut in that shit. Why investing in military when our neighbor is the USA? And anyway, who the heck want to attack Canada? It doesn't make sense.