Who has the most evil acts in comics?

Started by Mindset7 pages

Thanos is pretty stupid, huh?

Originally posted by Mindset
Thanos is pretty stupid, huh?
And Doom isnt?

Originally posted by Mindset
Thanos is pretty stupid, huh?

yet is smarter than Doom.. that says a lot about Doom eh?

May that debate never end?

Originally posted by Nihilist
And Doom isnt?
Nope.

If we're going by most horrific acts depicted on panel, the short list would probably be Kid Miracleman, Ozymandias, Human Flame, and Joker.

Originally posted by Mindset
Nope.
Come back to me when Thanos has prep and blueprints to build his own Detsroyer armor and still cant beat Thor with it.

^ low showing

read: Secret wars

when lucifer destroyed the manions of silence a billion billion souls were forever destroyed. to quote the angels--it was a monstrous act.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
^ low showing

read: Secret wars

You mean when guys were jobbing hard

Originally posted by tkitna
Sabretooth should probably get a mention. He kills for the fun of it at times. He sliced up Harmony Young for nothing more than giggles and to piss Cage off. Silver Fox got the same treatment as did a bunch of others.
Sabes gets a pass for fighting the evil of Wolverine though.

I'm going for a tie with either Superman or Batman. How many millions if not billions of lives would be saved if they had the backbone to do what is necessary, rather than allowing their enemies to live long enough to once again threaten the city/planet/universe?

Originally posted by Brockalizer
I'm going for a tie with either Superman or Batman. How many millions if not billions of lives would be saved if they had the backbone to do what is necessary, rather than allowing their enemies to live long enough to once again threaten the city/planet/universe?
That isn't on them though.

That doesn't make them evil, it makes them true to themselves to the point of being detrimental to others. You could call it stupid, but evil? No.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
That isn't on them though.

That doesn't make them evil, it makes them true to themselves to the point of being detrimental to others. You could call it stupid, but evil? No.

What makes it evil rather than stupid in my mind is the rationale behind it. They willingly jeopardize countless lives because they routinely decide that their "principals" are more important than protecting innocent lives.

Originally posted by Brockalizer
What makes it evil rather than stupid in my mind is the rationale behind it. They willingly jeopardize countless lives because they routinely decide that their "principals" are more important than protecting innocent lives.
But they do protect innocent lives...

Their principals make them fight the same battle for innocent lives with different stakes behind them many times.
They "put people at risk" and then save the day. Rinse and repeat

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
But they do protect innocent lives...

Their principals make them fight the same battle for innocent lives with different stakes behind them many times.
They "put people at risk" and then save the day. Rinse and repeat

So let me ask you this. If I know without a doubt that my neighbor beats his wife or molests his children and will continue to do so as long as he lives, I have the power to stop him but instead of doing something about it I wait for it to happen again so that I can swoop in and save the day. Is that evil?

Originally posted by Brockalizer
So let me ask you this. If I know without a doubt that my neighbor beats his wife or molests his children and will continue to do so as long as he lives, I have the power to stop him but instead of doing something about it I wait for it to happen again so that I can swoop in and save the day. Is that evil?
A more accurate comparison is you sending him to Prison, him getting out and then you getting the police a second time instead of killing him.

They aren't standing around and actually letting their villains murder people like your implying

Bran's post was pretty clear

Originally posted by Brockalizer
So let me ask you this. If I know without a doubt that my neighbor beats his wife or molests his children and will continue to do so as long as he lives, I have the power to stop him but instead of doing something about it I wait for it to happen again so that I can swoop in and save the day. Is that evil?
Do you also put him in jail every time you can?

And no, that's not evil. You're not the one plowing kids and beating his wife (probably deserved). You're just beating the shit out of him and him being dogshit retarded.

You're basically saying that if you don't kill someone who's evil (but do everything in your power to stop them) that you're even more evil than the person who you're fighting. No.

To put a hero in your scenario...
Superman would swoop in as soon as he hit the girl, punch his dick off. Throw him in jail, then when he gets out of jail, capture him again, etc. He might get away to try it again, but he wouldn't get far.

A

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
Do you also put him in jail every time you can?

And no, that's not evil. You're not the one plowing kids and beating his wife (probably deserved). You're just beating the shit out of him and him being dogshit retarded.

You're basically saying that if you don't kill someone who's evil (but do everything in your power to stop them) that you're even more evil than the person who you're fighting. No.

To put a hero in your scenario...
Superman would swoop in as soon as he hit the girl, punch his dick off. Throw him in jail, then when he gets out of jail, capture him again, etc. He might get away to try it again, but he wouldn't get far.

There are some bad guys that prison really wont work on. The justice system in the comics is just as inadequate as it is in the real world. Simply throwing Joker in jail doesn't eliminate the threat he poses. If they aren't evil then at least criminally insane. After all isn't the definition of insanity doing something repeatedly and expecting a different result?