Gladiator vs Silver Surfer vs Beta Ray Bill

Originally posted by Galan007
Since there's no gravity in space, it's kind of hard to gauge that feat. Clearly, though, it was pretty uber.

Heh, you just contradicted your entire argument that 'striking power=/=strength'. Done chatting with you now. Been fun. 🙂

You should check out his recent "galaxies are made of fluff" theory to lowball Odin's galaxy-busting power output , and then make a similar "WBH's multi-planets busting was ASTRNOMICALLY greater than regular planet-busting" claim all in the same post .

Originally posted by Galan007
Since there's no gravity in space, it's kind of hard to gauge that feat. Clearly, though, it was pretty uber.

Heh, you just contradicted your entire argument that 'striking power=/=strength'. Done chatting with you now. Been fun. 🙂

Huh?

You are funny. You know what I meant silly. I'll make it clear. Striking feats with tools that amp the force of your blows =/= strength feats to prove you are stronger.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You should check out his recent "galaxies are made of fluff" theory to lowball Odin's galaxy-busting power output , and then make a similar "WBH's multi-planets busting was ASTRNOMICALLY greater than regular planet-busting" claim all in the same post .

Is the material of galaxies more durable than say adamantium? Are hot gasses more durable than adamantium? How many blasts did it take Odin and Seth (or Infinity) to lay waste to a galaxy? How long did they fight? Do you use a character's highest feat as a representation of what they will do in a forum fight (either answer is fine)?

You don't understand WBH's feat. The force felt outside a collision is astronomically weaker than the force of the collision itself. The force that disintegrated all those beings and destroyed the planet was astronomically weaker than the force of the collision itself. Also, The planet being destroyed wasn't the feat at all. It was all the peers of Savage Hulk being disintegrated without even coming in contact with them.

But if you read my last posts you would know that I conceded an accepted that Odin can beat WBH if he's on his A game. Lastly, we don't know to what level the PG will amp WBH. The PG has amped beings more than a hundred times over before. Imagine WBH being 100x, 1000x, or even a million times more powerful.

From what i remember, Silver Surfer was the only one of those three who was inside a Black Hole:

Whatever, man.

Last time they fought, Surfer beat Beta Ray Bill soundly, and Gladiator don't want to mess with him.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You should check out his recent "galaxies are made of fluff" theory to lowball Odin's galaxy-busting power output , and then make a similar "WBH's multi-planets busting was ASTRNOMICALLY greater than regular planet-busting" claim all in the same post .

Originally posted by Bouboumaster
Whatever, man.

Last time they fought, Surfer beat Beta Ray Bill soundly

Originally posted by Bouboumaster
Whatever, man.

Last time they fought, Surfer beat Beta Ray Bill soundly, and Gladiator don't want to mess with him.

This pretty much sums it up.

Originally posted by Galan007
BRB has always been depicted as Thor's equal--and in some cases, his superior.

I wouldn't say that, I would say that BRB is more aggressive than Thor on a regular basis! Thor is BRB superior he is more versatile than BRB 😉

Originally posted by the Darkone
I wouldn't say that, I would say that BRB is more aggressive than Thor on a regular basis! Thor is BRB superior he is more versatile than BRB 😉

Originally posted by h1a8
I made a point that feats with the hammer aren't feats without the hammer. The hammer provides many times more force than Bill can provide with his bare hands. How does Bill's striking feats with Stormbreaker prove he is stronger than Glads WITHOUT STORMBREAKER? That makes no sense. If I use a tool that amps my striking multiple times over then how does that show I'm physically stronger than someone who is actually stronger than me?

So this is BRB before he got Stormbreaker, in your opinion then?

I'll remember that next time I see a GL thread...I'm going to argue that feats with a ring does not equal feats without a ring. Technically correct, yes, but still retarded.

Originally posted by Galan007
Bill's first h2h/hammerless fight against Thor, and his battle with Thor during B&T, are what I had in mind when I said: "and in some cases, his superior." There are other things Bill has done that Thor hasn't (and vice versa), but more times than not they've definitely been portrayed as equals.

Oh I agree with that statement, but Thor does have the better potential of power via RKT, I like both you cant go wrong having one of them on your team 😉 .

BRB taking on a possessed Wrecking and Sasquatch by Tarnqa, and working them was uber in Omega Flight series!!!

Originally posted by the Darkone
Oh I agree with that statement, but Thor does have the better potential of power via RKT, I like both you cant go wrong having one of them on your team 😉 .

BRB taking on a possessed Wrecking and Sasquatch by Tarnqa, and working them was uber in Omega Flight series!!!

Thor>BRB.

All his feats considered, yes. Thor has simply been around a LOT longer, thus he's had a LOT more appearances, over which he has accumulated a LOT more feats. However, any time they appear on panel together, they're almost always portrayed as equals.

BRB doesnt really have many low showings. Gladiator would work both Surfer and Bill though imo.

Originally posted by Galan007
All his feats considered, yes. Thor has simply been around a LOT longer, thus he's had a LOT more appearances, over which he has accumulated a LOT more feats. However, any time they appear on panel together, they're almost always portrayed as equals.

Originally posted by carver9
BRB doesnt really have many low showings. Gladiator would work both Surfer and Bill though imo.

Basically, I feel that BRB at his best is equal to Thor. And Thor at his best is beyond him. But conventionally, yeah, they're going to look equal to one another.

Oh, and lol @ Carver.

The truth is funny huh?

Yeah, the truth is hilarious. Kallark would get obliterated by either one of them.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Yeah, the truth is hilarious. Kallark would get obliterated by either one of them.

Yeah right. Kallark is stronger, faster, and more durable than both. His chances of winning is humongous. Learn from me Jake...my arms it out for you.