srankmissingnin
VP of Comic Knowledge
Originally posted by ODG
Two of the only times. Not the only two times.
Why even bother to specify that?
Originally posted by ODG
Mindless Hulk dying from his separation from Banner. That Sam Keith miniseries was awful. I recall Wolverine getting one-shotted to Boston there... so??? Wolverine had his Death amp. And he gets one or two shotted by him. You're right that he's not the only class 100 brick Wolverine's fought. Skaar two-shotted him too. Juggernaut tossed him around and one-shotted him. Thing one-shotted him once. Sentry tossed him around and one-shotted him. Wolverine can fight class 100 bricks. But acting like Wolverine fights them while shrugging off their blows is a mischaracterization and bastardization. Invoking Hulk doesn't help your case, since Wolverine gets wrecked by him and has been wrecked by him. Wolverine's been knocked out by far less than Hulk. So your sh1tty ABC logic of comparing Iron Fist to Hulk's power output is meaningless.
It's true Banner-less Hulk was dying, but he was also stronger than Savage Hulk.
The Sam Keith mini was better than both the examples you cited... by like 10 orders of magnitude on a logarithmic scale better. Although I do think it funny that you cite an example from one of the most universally reviled arcs in comic book history, and then have the audacity to write off another example because the book was "awful."
He got punched to Boston, but he was completely fine. Wolverine tanked being punched across state lines like it was nothing. Which should give you and indication of how much effect the Iron Fist will have on him. Hint: None what-so-ever.
Deathverine amp was the return of his Adamantium, a scimitar that shot a laser, and some other weaponry that he never used against the Hulk... that's it. He wasn't stronger, or faster and his healing factor wasn't amped any, the fact that he was Deathverine is of little to no significance. He got hit a good half a dozen plus times on panel before the Wolverine persona regained control and gave-up, then Apoc summed Deathverine back and said he and Hulk could fight for an eternity before either one of them won (something WWH also said).
It is the height of humor that you claim that Wolverine shrugging off class 100 blows is a "bastardization and characterization," then say something like "Thing one shotted Wolverine," as though that holds any weight. How many times have Thing and Wolverine fought? And how many times has Wolverine been one shotted? Same goes for the dozen or so times Wolverine has fought the Hulk. It's blatantly obvious that the example you are citing is the exception not the rule. For every single instance there is of Wolverine being one or two shotted by a class 100 brick there is half a dozen more when he takes those shots in stride like they are nothing. You are using the outlier to formulate your opinion and you have the gale to accuse someone else of creating a bastardize idealization of the character's abilities? What makes you think the minority representation is more valid that majority? The stuff you are citing can be countered by a margin of more than ten to one in a feat war. Not do you low ball Wolverine with bullshit PIS feats, that but in your next breath you purport the merits of the Iron Fist by citing 1 in a 100 examples like the train or helicarrier punch... as though that's the standard for Danny's striking power? 9 out of 10 times the Iron Fist is more or Spider-man, car destroyer level. Dude, I doubt your bias could be any more transparent if you tried.
Originally posted by ODG
Prior to 1981, we the audience did not know he had a defined healing factor that was responsible for the feats Wolverine had under his belt. After it was explicitly revealed, Wolverine's prior feats made complete sense in retrospect (how else does he survive getting knocked into lunar orbit by Jahf in 1977???). So he had a healing factor before 1981 in his appearances and it is applied. You also are aware of this because every single flashback to his pre-1981 appearances conserves those fights as they stood with his healing factor in play.Until you have on-panel evidence that Wolverine did not have his healing factor to overturn all the flashbacks to his pre-1981 appearances, you're just making up sh1tty excuses and myths to disregard fights you don't care for. As for post-1981 fights that you want to disregard, you just make up other sh1tty excuses and invoke "zomg PIS" to disregard fights you don't care for. Your myth is busted. It was easy to bust. Stop trying to bring that sh1tty myth up.
Now you are purposely confusing the issue. You aren't citing flash backs that take place pre 1981 in Wolverine continuity, you are citing actually issues that were published in that time frame. Obviously we know that in current continuity Wolverine has always had a healing factor, but that wasn't always the case, and you are citing issues from before those clarifications were made. Sunspot originally didn't have enhanced durability to go along with his super strength.... the fact that he does now doesn't magically elevate all the feats of people injuring him prior to that point in his history of publication. Welcome to the world of retcons. If you want to cite Flashbacks, feel free to do so... but that is not what you are doing. You are citing examples from a well documented time when the writers had no idea what Wolverine's origin was, what his powers were and hadn't even decided if he was an actually mutant yet, and then pretending like those incidents have a relevant baring in a discussion regarding Wolverine now. They don't. In any issue of Wolverine published before 1981, Wolverine does not have a healing factor.
If you really don't understand the concept of retcons and continuity, I'm sure you can PM one of the mods and have them explain it to you.