bluewaterrider
Senior Member
Originally posted by -Pr-
Crossovers aren't really sufficient evidence, and Aquaman does have feats of strength in the dozens, if not hundreds of tons in weight.
I have knowledge of few, if any, of these.
I doubt your average comic fan does, either. I would assert, in fact, that the average professional comic book writer does not have such knowledge either, else Namor versus Aquaman would have been written as a more equal engagment.
Originally posted by -Pr-
But I could say the same about, say, Storm Vs Wonder Woman. Or Superboy Vs Spider-Man. Crossovers in general were just poorly written, wouldn't you say?
For this particular thread, the question of Crossover Validity is worth returning to. In terms of story quality, yes, I probably would say that crossovers in general were poorly written. On the other hand, the result of Storm versus Wonder Woman makes logical sense if we actually examine how Wonder Woman fared in her own company books during that era. The answer, generally, was ... "Not very well".
Would that I had Marvel versus DC 1996 in some digital format here for uploading. On the other hand, I'm fairly certain virtually everyone who has wandered into this thread has seen at some point in their life how that battle unfolded. Diana, finding herself possessed of Mjolnir, lays DOWN the weapon, simultaneously allowing the power of Thor that it stacked onto her to be given up as well.
She does this so that she can fight Storm of the X-Men on at least somewhat even terms.
I don't remember the exact timing of the issue. Think it was just about the time of the Byrne run. Messner-Loebs was ending, John Byrne was beginning. Looking at John Byrne's run, the fight action that follows, simple and brief though it was, would, outside of comics, be difficult to explain.
Imagine the strongest person you can think of. Now imagine that person twice as strong as THAT.
Could you take a knockout kick to the head from them?
In comics though, one missed knockout opportunity can be forgiven.
Diana is actually reasonably gentle with human opponents, she only uses fractional force to start, gauging the level of force they can withstand before escalating things. And one blow is all she's given the opportunity for.
Storm retaliates immediately afterwards with lightning.
Diana withstands for a moment till Storm increases the current, whereupon Diana drops.
Such a result would have seemed ludicrous in, say 2010.
(Not too many people were happy with it back then in 1996 or so, either.)
But no rules were being violated there.
There isn't really anything save the fickle whim and magic of Zeus & Co
providing invulnerability to Diana.
Unreasonable to expect a woman who could be hurt by bullets not to be laid low by electricity, no?
Even the Rhino has been dropped from such things.
So why NOT Diana?
At any rate, the reason for bringing that up ...?
Even as late as 2008, some 12 years after that event and steadily more impressive showings, Wondy STILL proved/proves herself vulnerable to electric shock. Check it out: