Originally posted by janus77
Because most people carried on with the convention from the previous threads.We know - as it states so in the comics - that it's Green Scar and His nickname is also "WorldBreaker".
Complaining to mods is low though, didn't think you'd be that type of a person.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Same as when people use DOS Superman, or H/P Doomsday, or Doomsday Rex. Or Voidtry, or Siegetry, or Sentry - aren't all the Sentries the same guy, he always has the Void within him? But we have placed limiters on him. Somehow, I don't see you arguing as passionately as for him.
I'm cool with using them interchangeably but there are marked differences. Sadly, ofcourse, using them interchangeably means Hulk beats the snot out of Voidtry as he was holding back a lot when he beat a non-holding back Sentry.
Originally posted by janus77
No to what? and this is a legitimate question, given the way you've defined a new character.Are Savage Hulk feats relevant to "WWH"?
The only reason people used to label it WWH was to include the Green Scar AND his latest exploits [WWH arc, back then]. Hulk was known as Green Scar throughout the arc.
To even cut off where WWH arc ends, so as to prevent certain feats from being included, just hammers home the arbitrariness of it.
It's not abritrary at all.
Personally, I don't mind people using feats from Savage. WWH Hulk is just the highest you can go due to the nature of the arc and what came after it.
Originally posted by janus77
No, it's just a reflection of the fact that the moderator made the ruling after being prompted by "complaints" from certain posters.He named no names, but you can see the trolling that goes on wrt Hulk threads.
That's not true in the slightest.
Originally posted by janus77
Re "Voidtry" - He is supposed to be a different character apparently, as Void and Sentry have had different - and contrasting - feats and have fought each other.I'm cool with using them interchangeably but there are marked differences. Sadly, ofcourse, using them interchangeably means Hulk beats the snot out of Voidtry as he was holding back a lot when he beat a non-holding back Sentry.
First part of the first paragraph - contrasting feats, is precisely why there was a ruling, I guess.
Sure, and he may very well beat him, and soundly too, like a blonde headed step child in China.
Originally posted by DamborgsonYouTube video
a few months of low showings won't undo decades of superiority.
Originally posted by The Sorrow
Could you expand on this?Why is he not allowed to become stronger but his feats from weaker incarnations count?
He is allowed to get angrier. Just not to the extent of WBH, given the circumstances that were present in WWH.
There'd be a tangible difference in strength between the Hulk that fought Iron Man and the one that fought Sentry, for instance.
Originally posted by Damborgson
Depends who that god is.If it's the one I'm thinking of, a few months of low showings won't undo decades of superiority.
Yes, because nothing screams superiority like being hit in the face with your own hammer.