Originally posted by dadudemon
Or perhaps my version is more correct? Of course, you've already made up your mind. But explain why there are not hundreds of videos like these popping up? Do you really think the Dems would sit by, especially with how sensitive both sides are to voting fraud, without some sort of documentation of what happened?Of course you're right and so is the "software developer" in that video.
Apparently you are a very trusting individual. There is no such thing as partisan politics on the internet and the other video that matches up with that "troubleshooting" he did is out there on the net but the GOP is suppressing it, right?
"I initially selected Obama but Romney was highlighted. I assumed it was being picky so I deselected Romney and tried Obama again, this time more carefully, and still got Romney. Being a software developer, I immediately went into troubleshoot mode. I first thought the calibration was off and tried selecting Jill Stein to actually highlight Obama. Nope. Jill Stein was selected just fine. Next I deselected her and started at the top of Romney's name and started tapping very closely together to find the 'active areas'. From the top of Romney's button down to the bottom of the black checkbox beside Obama's name was all active for Romney. From the bottom of that same checkbox to the bottom of the Obama button (basically a small white sliver) is what let me choose Obama. Stein's button was fine. All other buttons worked fine."
So a person that is clearly hamming it up writes some more words that magically level up with the hamming. Cool. And he's a software developer?
When I read that from him, I thought this:
This is clearly a lie* but let's pretend you are clueles as to who the NBPPs are.
*You're pretty damn smart and very educated. The probability that you have no clue what the beliefs of the members of the NBPP group are is extremely slim.
They did? I mean...I guess that's one way of looking at it but I read things like:
"But whatever we will do, it will be legal and lawful under the Constitution of the United States," Shabazz told “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.”
and
"Jerry Jackson, who was charged in the 2008 case along with Minister King Samir Shabazz, but later saw charges dropped by the Department of Justice, was seen early Tuesday outside a North Philadelphia voting site wearing the group’s trademark black beret, combat-style uniform and heavy boots. Fox News confirmed he is a designated poll watcher."
Now, I'm pretty outspoken about how ridiculous FoxNews can get with their "news", but that seems overly fair to Jerry Jackson. Not only did they remind the reader of who he was in 2008, the were quick to point out that the charges were dropped, he was official, and he said he wasn't going to bring silly things like billy clubs.
Still, on top of that, you have a members of the NBPP standing outside of polling places (some of them dressed with black beret, combat-style uniform and heavy boots). So what does the NBPP believe and why would "some white people" be afraid with them standing outside voting locations?
Now, if you were not just indulging in more partisan politics and were making an objective observation about voting fraud, you may have mentioned the problem happening in New Mexico. Seems legit...but smells of more GOP whining. What do you think? Legit or not?
did anyone read all that?