Russell Edgington vs. Link (TP)

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
That's not good enough. Sorry. So Russell's best feat is not enough, he can't win then.

Let it go. Russell wins.

170. Blatant lie.

171 another lie. You have admitted Russell's best feat is ripping out human spines, he cannot hurt Link.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
170. Blatant lie.

171 another lie. You have admitted Russell's best feat is ripping out human spines, he cannot hurt Link.

Bulbins men.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I said tha feat alone is greater than Link's sword aided feats.

Bulbins men.

175. Defeated point.

Link wins, too durable.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
174. Lie.

175. Defeated point.

Link wins, too durable.

Bulbins men.

Link tanks axes to the chin from characters stronger than Russell. Tadah.

180. Defeated point.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Link tanks axes to the chin from characters stronger than Russell. Tadah.

180. Defeated point.

Russell is stronger than both and I can back my claims. You cannot.

182. Lowball. K.Bulbin shows he can ragdoll a rhino sized boar with his axe, a class 5 feat.

183. Blatant lie. Russell's best feats are all under one ton.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
182. Lowball. K.Bulbin shows he can ragdoll a rhino sized boar with his axe, a class 5 feat.

183. Blatant lie. Russell's best feats are all under one ton.

Speculation.

Russell rips bodies apart which neither Link nor Bulbin can do. Fact.

188. Blatant lie, it's been quantified.

189. They've been quantified too.

190. Blatant Lie, both Link and K.Bulbin have superior feats.

Link wins, too durable.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
188. Blatant lie, it's been quantified.

189. They've been quantified too.

190. Blatant Lie, both Link and K.Bulbin have superior feats.

Link wins, too durable.

Nope.

No, they cannot or have not ripped bodies apart.

Bulbins men.

193. Lie. The cutscene is official and unambiguous.

194. Lie.

195. Fallacy, their feats make 'ripping bodies apart' look more like 'ripping paper apart'.

196. Defeated point.

Russell can't hurt Link.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
193. Lie. The cutscene is official and unambiguous.

194. Lie.

195. Fallacy, their feats make 'ripping bodies apart' look more like 'ripping paper apart'.

196. Defeated point.

Russell can't hurt Link.

Wrong. Link can't even beat the feats with a sword you claim can rip apart continents.

Bulbins men.

Math > Your guess.

203. Blatant lie, Link has better feats barehanded, let alone with the Master Sword.

204. Defeated point.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Math > Your guess.

203. Blatant lie, Link has better feats barehanded, let alone with the Master Sword.

204. Defeated point.

Such as ?

That isn't debating.

214. Fallacy. That line of reasoning prevents any feat from being used.

Overpowering Fyrus.

Prove Russell is strong enough to harm Link with a strength feat.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
214. Fallacy. That line of reasoning prevents any feat from being used.

Overpowering Fyrus.

Prove Russell is strong enough to harm Link with a strength feat.

Boots. Cheating.

Bulbins men.

Spine rip.

You don't need math to know that Link's feats are better, but it is a more accurate way of judging how much better. 🙂

219. Defeated point.

220 Defeated point.

Not a good enough feat, so Link wins, and you're satisfied with this?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You don't need math to know that Link's feats are better, but it is a more accurate way of judging how much better. 🙂

219. Defeated point.

220 Defeated point.

Not a good enough feat, so Link wins, and you're satisfied with this?

Nope.

Russell wins. Greater speed, greater strength feats, and I support my claims.

230. Lie. Link is stronger than Fyrus.

231. Lie, Russell cannot harm Link.