no im not king castle but I have read all his posters before he got his account deleted, which if funny because banned members only get their accounts restricted but king castle got his account deleted, I checked recently. But it doesnt matter because I have a good memory and I remember his posters, also you can't delete quotes if people quote you.
So guess what if king castle is here I can compare grammer styles..hehe
Discovery Channel's shows on sex and sexuality are always interesting. That was where I first saw what was mentioned earlier about cleavage on the chest reflecting the rear and lipstick helping to hint at engorged labia. Once again though, nudity seems to be a large problem only in societies that base their feelings on it on spiritual beliefs of some sort, vs those that simply go by the culture at large.
I'm being overly general here, but it seems pointless to delineate every little nuance of the argument.
Originally posted by Robtard
Nah, you wouldn't. But I'm glad to have you back and glad you're finally out of the closet. That whole gay-sexually-repressed-aggressive-ex-marine wasn't working out for you.
In a time of woe I told my parents. (baby steps). They however did not take it so well, but I had decided earliar that with or without their support I would be myself. I guess life is funny that way, no one can tell you how to live your life or can live it for you, you have to build it up from nothing. (baby steps)
Originally posted by rudester
I strongly believe the human body is beautiful. It's the only element that connects us to everyone else, that we are made up of all the same features. Human evolution shows us that most cultures imbraced nudity yet modern today teaches us that nudity is shameful, lustful and linked to copulation like act.We invented cloths to warm the body and chose to cover ourselves, why should we feel exposed for being natural or feel any such guilt for that matter?
Originally posted by rudester
I just thought of something thanks to dudemon. If men show their chest in public why is it not seen as nudity, yet when women do it; its seen as unnatural behaviour and sinful?
Women breasts are associated with their sexuality. This is not the case with Men and they can afford to show their chest without much hesitancy.
Also, don't stereotype among women. Do you think that every women would love to show her breasts in public?
Seriously! What is your IQ level?
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenDNudity is defined as "prehistoric" to you?
Why don't we just go back to Stone Age? Why make all the progress only to revert back to prehistoric practices?
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenDThe problem is why any of that matters.
Common sense: Women are physically different from Men.Women breasts are associated with their sexuality. This is not the case with Men and they can afford to show their chest without much hesitancy.
Also, don't stereotype among women. Do you think that every women would love to show her breasts in public?
Seriously! What is your IQ level?
I'm not saying nudity should be a way of life idiot and we should go back to being nude. (ahahha) Did I say that??? No! And we already practice nudity; in special swing clubs, on nude beaches, for celebrations as a form of pride and liberation.
Women breasts are associated with sexuality, yet mens breast aren't? Men can afford it because Men were always the dominating species and men deminstrated this to a women by deminstrating their power on display. (this is a form of repression that men were always the dominators over women) Women have been taught that their breast are shameful over centuries, men haven't. Men can afford to show their chest without much hesitancy because generations ago, man told women what was what and women believed it!
What does my IQ level have anything to do with logic and history? Its only up until now that nudity has been seen as shameful, are you saying that nudity was wrong in the time of christ? I'm not saying that everyone should walk around naked no, that's stupid. I'm saying that the representation of nudity is seen as a shameful act but shouldn't be seen as anything... that religious groups and fanatics have made it seem shameful! And have made culture be ashamed of are bodies.
Originally posted by rudester
I'm not saying nudity should be a way of life idiot and we should go back to being nude. (ahahha) Did I say that??? No! And we already practice nudity; in special swing clubs, on nude beaches, for celebrations as a form of pride and liberation.
"It's the only element that connects us to everyone else, that we are made up of all the same features."
Bonding can be both physical and emotional. And women and men have same features? Seriously? 🙄
"Human evolution shows us that most cultures imbraced nudity yet modern today teaches us that nudity is shameful, lustful and linked to copulation like act."
This is called progress. Many people abandoned paganish lifestyle with passage of time.
"We invented cloths to warm the body and chose to cover ourselves, why should we feel exposed for being natural or feel any such guilt for that matter?"
When people used to wear revealing cloths during ancient times, they didn't felt much shame back then. As human ethics evolved or progressed with passage of time, so did the mindset accordingly.
Originally posted by rudester
Women breasts are associated with sexuality, yet mens breast aren't?
Originally posted by rudester
Men can afford it because Men were always the dominating species and men deminstrated this to a women by deminstrating their power on display. (this is a form of repression that men were always the dominators over women) Women have been taught that their breast are shameful over centuries, men haven't. Men can afford to show their chest without much hesitancy because generations ago, man told women what was what and women believed it!
Their used to be an age in which both genders were scantily clothed. But as human ethics evolved, so did perceptions.
Many women themselves willingly accepted the notion that they are not sex commodities or objects and neither they should be treated as such, and embraced modesty.
Their is always a limit to influence of one gender over another. Females can be daughters, sisters, wives and mothers. In all of these roles, females can HEAVILY influence their own men at minimum.
Don't be naive.
Originally posted by rudester
What does my IQ level have anything to do with logic and history? Its only up until now that nudity has been seen as shameful, are you saying that nudity was wrong in the time of christ? I'm not saying that everyone should walk around naked no, that's stupid. I'm saying that the representation of nudity is seen as a shameful act but shouldn't be seen as anything... that religious groups and fanatics have made it seem shameful! And have made culture be ashamed of are bodies.
Nudity is acceptable under certain conditions. This has been the norm since advanced human civilizations began to form and NOT RECENTLY as you are implying.
And religions (Abrahamic in particular) do not make people ashamed of their bodies. They simply discourage immorality at societal level. But of course, in private, people can do as they please. Also, it is these religions that have taught women to not present themselves like sex commodities or objects in the first place.
Originally posted by Robtard
Nudist colonies do it all the time.
Nudity is acceptable under certain circumstances but should not be norm; hence the notion of it being regarded as taboo.
Originally posted by Robtard
Such as?
But of course, some societies have gone too far under the garb of liberalism. These so-called progressive societies are once again reshaping women in to sex commodities and objects.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
So?Nudity is acceptable under certain circumstances but should not be norm; hence the notion of it being regarded as taboo.
Private moments.
But of course, some societies have gone too far under the garb of liberalism. These so-called progressive societies are once again reshaping women in to sex commodities and objects.
So? The point is that not everyone goes by 'naked body = sex'. We're humans, we have higher brain functions and control.
Wow.
Double wow.
Triple wow. You seem extremely sexually repressed. Did you grow up in a very religious household?
Originally posted by Robtard
So? The point is that not everyone goes by 'naked body = sex'. We're humans, we have higher brain functions and control.Wow.
Double wow.
Tell me; Which woman will arouse you sexually - scantily clothed or fully covered?
Originally posted by Robtard
Triple wow. You seem extremely sexually repressed. Did you grow up in a very religious household?
I did grew-up in a religious household and I am contended with my upbringing.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Higher brain functions and control means jack, genius. 🙄
which other species of apex predator could you fit 60-70 of in a crowded auditorium with the expectation that there will be no violence?
EDIT: now extrapolate that to the tens of thousands who attend sporting events, where there are charged emotions and direct competition involved.
/psychfail
EDIT2: you can replace violence with rape if this needs to be made explicitly relevant to the topic at hand.
Originally posted by Oliver North
which other species of apex predator could you fit 60-70 of in a crowded auditorium with the expectation that there will be no violence?EDIT: now extrapolate that to the tens of thousands who attend sporting events, where there are charged emotions and direct competition involved.
/psychfail
/psychfail certainly for you.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
People usually restrain themselves due to repercussions of wrongdoings.
is not congruent with:
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Higher brain functions and control means jack, genius. 🙄
kthx
EDIT:
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
But incidents can and do happen anywhere and in any kind of social gathering.
at rates far lower than would be expected if higher cognitive function "meant jack"