Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I've finished refuting Jack's feats, bring some more up if you'd like and I'll refute them too. It hasn't been very difficult.He engaged in sword play with Scotsmen... if we are going to draw tenuous links between stuff like that and strength, than Wolverine would be class 70-100. Logan's blocked attacks from numerous super strong characters without being overwhelmed by their strength, Gamora, Warbird and The Huntsmen two name just a few. He's physically over powered Ursa Major. He stopped Achelous bull charge... by running straight into it and ramming him with his head, and that guy one shotted Hercules. She Hulk had difficulty restraining him. Ect. ect. ect. Jack blocking the Scotsmen has as much to do with his strength as Wolverine not getting launched into a different continent every time a cl100 decks him. It's a plot mechanic... not a strength feat.
And? Wolverine's injured the Hulk with kicks, punches and head butts. If we are pretending that Jack fighting the Scotsmen is a strength feat, then Wolverine gets the same benefit of the doubt.
You have refuted nothing. You've only done exactly what I said, lowball Jack and wank Wolverine.
Jack blocked a sword strike and kept the Scotsman from cutting him in half. Constitutes as hell of a lot more of a strength feat than wriggling out of a bear hug or something.
Jack has fought armies of enemies single handedly, clearly demonstrated proficiency in martial arts and swordplay, leaped hundreds of feet into the air, and more. If you can show me Wolverine doing any of this crap, great. I'll do my best to raise you one feat better from Jack. What's nonsense is you showing me Wolverine doing that, and then turning around and saying "Oh, but Jack's doesn't count, 'cause later on this happens." Especially with this Deer kicking Logan's ass that I keep seeing, and with all of his other lower feats. You wreak of bias and general idiocy.