Originally posted by "Id"
Unless Wondy can match Lobo's trillion ton crushing force, or hip tossing stellar mass. Than Lobo holds a significant advantage over Diana.
Originally posted by abhilegend
First was a crossover
Originally posted by abhilegend
and second goes to space cheese. By the same token unless lobo has done something like slowing down spectre who weighted infinite, diana holds a significant advantage. By comparisons lobo isn't much stronger than diana if stronger at all.
Originally posted by "Id"He's saying space cheese doesn't prove anything by providing a space cheese feat that is superior and also baffling in its idiocy (slowing down infinity).
>dumbs down the feat by labling as space cheese.
>uses space cheese to claim a superior feat.
>durbating.
So it's not hypocrisy as much as it is him telling you that your argumentation is dumb.
Originally posted by Philosophía
He's saying space cheese doesn't prove anything by providing a space cheese feat that is superior and also baffling in its idiocy (slowing down infinity).So it's not hypocrisy as much as it is him telling you that your argumentation is dumb.
Originally posted by Galan007
To be fair, tossing around Pulsar Stargrave really isn't space cheese in the sense that moving Spectre's 'infinite' weight is. The former is [a lot] more quantifiable than the latter.
Than you factor in, that scene took place in the middle of a fight where Pulsar happened to weigh stellar mass. It does not fall under the premise of Space Cheese.
The labeling of space cheese, are reserved for scenes that take place over a static object or event. Like planet moving, sun ripping, or in this case Spectre lifting.
Originally posted by Galan007Why would it being more quantifiable not make it space cheese? Is moving Earth or containing supernovas not a space cheese feat because it's quantifiable?
To be fair, tossing around Pulsar Stargrave really isn't space cheese in the sense that moving Spectre's 'infinite' weight is. The former is [a lot] more quantifiable than the latter.
Originally posted by "Id"Wait...what?
Than you factor in, that scene took place in the middle of a fight where Pulsar happened to weigh stellar mass. It does not fall under the premise of Space Cheese.The labeling of space cheese, are reserved for scenes that take place over a static object or event. Like planet moving, sun ripping, or in this case Spectre lifting.
Lots of space cheese takes place in middle of fights. It doesn't change the fact that they are.
The circumstances in which they happen are irrelevant. He could have done it sitting on his toilet, dragging stellar mass is a space cheese.
What matters is that most of the 'feats' involving planets, suns, blackholes and more being moved/destroyed etc. and the like are there just as 'fireworks' - they don't really mean much in as far as actual fighting goes, eventough by all rights they should - simply because that's how comics work.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaMoving stellar mass isn't on the same level of stupidity as moving infinite mass. Call the former space cheese if you'd like, but comparing it to the latter isn't the best analogy.
Why would it being more quantifiable not make it space cheese? Is moving Earth or containing supernovas not a space cheese feat because it's quantifiable?
Originally posted by Philosophía
Why would it being more quantifiable not make it space cheese? Is moving Earth or containing supernovas not a space cheese feat because it's quantifiable?
Wait...what?Lots of space cheese takes place in middle of fights. It doesn't change the fact that they are.
The circumstances in which they happen are irrelevant. He could have done it sitting on his toilet, dragging stellar mass is a space cheese.
What matters is that most of the 'feats' involving planets, suns, blackholes and more being moved/destroyed etc. and the like are there just as 'fireworks' - they don't really mean much in as far as actual fighting goes, eventough by all rights they should - simply because that's how comics work.
Thats fantastic. I can dismiss the upper highs of Wonder Woman, or Supermans feats simply because the bulk of them are space cheese.
Originally posted by Galan007What you call 'higher level of stupidity' I call 'also stupid, but a bigger feat'. They're both stupid. Lobo's feat was called stupid in the same page it was done. That's the point of cosmic feats - they're stupid when elaborated on what they mean, and are there only for the cool factor. The fact that you want one to be considered valid and the other one to be considered stupid is because you're biased towards Lobo - let's not pretend there's anything else to it.
Moving stellar mass isn't on the same level of stupidity as moving infinite mass. Call the former space cheese if you'd like, but comparing it to the latter isn't the best analogy.
Originally posted by "Id"Go right ahead.
Thats fantastic. I can dismiss the upper highs of Wonder Woman, or Supermans feats simply because the bulk of them are space cheese.
When you see me countering 'Thor has beaten Worthy Thing and Hulk' with 'Superman has lifted infinite weight', you're free to do so.
But, you know, don't imply others are hypocrites.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaPlease don't put words in my mouth.
What you call 'higher level of stupidity' I call 'also stupid, but a bigger feat'. They're both stupid. Lobo's feat was called stupid in the same page it was done. That's the point of cosmic feats - they're stupid when elaborated on what they mean, and are there only for the cool factor. The fact that you want one to be considered valid and the other one to be considered stupid is because you're biased towards Lobo - let's not pretend there's anything else to it.
I never said one of those feats was more vaild than the other. Not once. I said that while both of the feats were stupid, throwing the stellar mass of Pulsar was less stupid/space-cheesy then slowing down Spectre's 'infinite mass'. Suggesting otherwise shows me your bias toward Dianna... And despite what you suggested, I've yet to use that feat on behalf of Lobo. Why would I? It lends nothing to this particular battle.
Anyway, to be even clearer:
Lifting stellar mass is dumb. Lifting infinity is dumber. Stellar mass can actually be quantified. Infinity cannot.
No need to make this more than it is. 🙂