Originally posted by Galan007You tried to save the validity of the Lobo feat by saying that it is, and I quote [so you don't cry again that I'm putting words into your mouth]:
Please don't put words in my mouth.I never said one of those feats was more vaild than the other. Not once. I said that while both of the feats were stupid, throwing the stellar mass of Pulsar was less stupid/space-cheesy then slowing down Spectre's 'infinite mass'. Suggesting otherwise shows me your bias toward Dianna... And despite what you suggested, I've yet to use that feat on behalf of Lobo. Why would I? It lends nothing to this particular battle.
Anyway, to be even clearer:
Lifting stellar mass is dumb. Lifting infinity is dumber. Stellar mass can actually be quantified. Infinity cannot.No need to make this more than it is. 🙂
"To be fair, tossing around Pulsar Stargrave really isn't space cheese in the sense that moving Spectre's 'infinite' weight is. The former is [a lot] more quantifiable than the latter. "
In short, just because it's more quantifiable than the infinite weight thing, it means that it's less space cheese and more valid [because the discussion at hand was on space cheese being invalid when comparing characters]. Why? Because you say so.
What is 'space cheese' isn't based on whether or not the feat is quantifiable or not. Surfer destroying a planet, Kyle destroying a supernova, Superman holding a black hole in his palm or, yes, Lobo dragging a sun are all moderately quantifiable, and they don't stop being space cheese for that, the same way Superman cauterizing space/time with his HV or lifting infinite weight also fits that category by definition - what differs being, of course, the magnitude (ie. lifting infinite weight > containing blackhole > destroying planet etc.) It's an arbitrary criteria that doesn't hold under any kind of logical scrutinity.
You're essentially saying that because Lobo's feat is less impressive [ie. stellar mass compared to infinite weight] then it means that is holds more validity, which is a hilariously stupid method to debate.