Originally posted by Starscream M
stop bringing decade old featswhat has thor done in the past 5 years in strength?!
Canon is canon. Marvel doesn't do reboots for the most part. Selective ignorance is selective. If we're to ignore the feat entirely because it's old, then we're using different methods of arriving at a conclusion and our conversation is incompatible for actual debate.
srug
I actually don't think Thor's the key here. We know he has comparable but lower total strength than Kal. But we also know Surfer can amp to similar levels, Gladiator rests around the same, etc.
And "old" Superman, PC or mid-crises, has feats that put him in this range as well. The recent feat isn't anything new, so to speak, it just puts DCnU Superman around the same level he was before. This time it just puts a quantifiable total on it - whereas his other best feats are probably similar but don't have a number attached to them.
We like to glorify the new. The newest feats take precedence and seem greater than the rest. It happens with any character. But we're not dealing with a wildly stronger Superman imo. He'd win an arm-wrestling contest with any one of these guys, imo, but is sorely outmatched here.