Bench-press Earth

Started by Starscream M6 pages

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Did you get beat up by a Norseman once?

'cause this vendetta you have against Thor is quite sad.

vendetta? just cuz Im trying to clear up a misconception?

thor is one of my top 3 fav characters in marvel, and one of the coolest character concepts in comics. just cuz I dont irrationally wank him does not mean i have a vendetta

Originally posted by Starscream M
lol so I guess there is no feat

lol, why are you so butthurt when it comes to Thor? Seriously.

Sure there are; they just don't all fall in to your picky little category.

Originally posted by Starscream M
vendetta? just cuz Im trying to clear up a misconception?

thor is one of my top 3 fav characters in marvel, and one of the coolest character concepts in comics. just cuz I dont irrationally wank him does not mean i have a vendetta

lol, that's a bold-faced lie.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Gammafather isn't a HH.durhulk

It was gladiator, quasar and ronan. SS and BRB did that to another planet. Post crisis superman did that to earth+moon+a BIG ship and moved it from another star system to this via hyperspace.

It's true bro. Hulk at his base or close to it is an elite class 100 on par with Thor, Superman etc. at this point. He only gets stronger than them at this point.

Thanks. Someone do the math for me, how much force does moving an -Earth sized, at least imo- planet across million light years despite the gravity of a yellow class Star like our Sun take?

I think Pre-Flashpoint Superman's history with Celestial bodies is a bit more complicated than that. Hyperspace don't count bro.

Originally posted by Starscream M
what in hell has thor done to make you think he can move earth? please give me ONE, just ONE, feat in the past decade

Or you could prove a depowering on Thor's part to show why old feats shouldn't be Canon.

Originally posted by Starscream M
lol so I guess there is no feat

Thor's not been placed in many situations where his raw physical might was tested in the form of lifting outside of the Asgard feat (which is really not all that much of a low end feat considering it's a magical city that Thor created from nothing) within past years. Currently, he's more about striking power, blasting power, and element/storm control.

Does that mean his strength feats don't count? No, that's borderline retarded. Especially considering how he fares against said peers consistently.

You getting mad about nothing and demanding feats doesn't change anything.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Or you could prove a depowering on Thor's part to show why old feats shouldn't be Canon.
common sense dictates that characters in marvel have undergone significant changes

marvel doesn't do reboots like dc...but that doesn't mean, feats that were written in a completely different era still are representative of what characters are capable of today

we can gauge a character's standing today based on what they have done in the past 10 years, which shouldn't be a problem

Originally posted by Starscream M
common sense dictates that characters in marvel have undergone significant changes

marvel doesn't do reboots like dc...but that doesn't mean, feats that were written in a completely different era still are representative of what characters are capable of today

we can gauge a character's standing today based on what they have done in the past 10 years, which shouldn't be a problem

And who decided on this arbitrary number?

Originally posted by Starscream M
vendetta? just cuz Im trying to clear up a misconception?

thor is one of my top 3 fav characters in marvel, and one of the coolest character concepts in comics. just cuz I dont irrationally wank him does not mean i have a vendetta

No, you're being butthurt about Thor, per usual. And if it's not about Thor, it's somehow Thor related, and generally, it's born of ignorance.

For Thor being one of your top three favorite characters, you display an incredible level of lack of knowledge concerning him. No one says you need to read or own all of his appearances, but you would think that if knowledgeable posters cite and post feats for you, you'd take those into consideration instead of trying to lowball and demean said feats of one of your "favorites".

At this point, it's one of the KMC "schticks", much like Carver marking out for anything Hulk, Quan riding Thanos, Abhi getting Superdefensive, me praising Doom, etc.

Originally posted by -Pr-
lol, why are you so butthurt when it comes to Thor? Seriously.

Sure there are; they just don't all fall in to your picky little category.

Im not butthurt about thor...he's a popular marvel character, so i'd rather discuss him than say, gladiator or herc, who I could use to make similar points

how is my category picky? I'm asking for ONE, just ONE strength feat in the past TEN years...is that really asking for so much?

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
It's true bro. Hulk at his base or close to it is an elite class 100 on par with Thor, Superman etc. at this point. He only gets stronger than them at this point.

Thanks. Someone do the math for me, how much force does moving an -Earth sized, at least imo- planet across million light years despite the gravity of a yellow class Star like our Sun take?

I think Pre-Flashpoint Superman's history with Celestial bodies is a bit more complicated than that. Hyperspace don't count bro.


I know bro. I actually read hulk comics.

It was done off panel and nothing was shown, nothing to calculate.

One lesser feat doesn't makes a higher feat vanish. Hyperspace doesn't decreases distance, so it counts perfectly.

Originally posted by -Pr-
And who decided on this arbitrary number?
because its reasonable to assume a popular character to have some feats within a ten year span, no?

Originally posted by Starscream M
common sense dictates that characters in marvel have undergone significant changes

marvel doesn't do reboots like dc...but that doesn't mean, feats that were written in a completely different era still are representative of what characters are capable of today

we can gauge a character's standing today based on what they have done in the past 10 years, which shouldn't be a problem

You'd have a point if Marvel didn't reference those stories and eras on a regular basis and if Marvel didn't make a great deal of all their characters more powerful currently than when they were conceived in the 60's/70's.

Originally posted by Starscream M
Im not butthurt about thor...he's a popular marvel character, so i'd rather discuss him than say, gladiator or herc, who I could use to make similar points

how is my category picky? I'm asking for ONE, just ONE strength feat in the past TEN years...is that really asking for so much?

Your posts say different.

Why ten years? Why not twenty? Or twenty-five?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
No one says you need to read or own all of his appearances, but you would think that if knowledgeable posters cite and post feats for you, you'd take those into consideration instead of trying to lowball and demean said feats of one of your "favorites".
jake, I asked for one strength feat of thor in the past 10 years and I've gotten nothing, so don't give me bull that people have been posting feats for me

I just want ONE thor strength feat in the past TEN years...I really dont think thats unreasonable.

So, Pr, hows that sig you promised me about two years back coming along?

Originally posted by Starscream M
because its reasonable to assume a popular character to have some feats within a ten year span, no?

Except that up until the reboot, DC characters had 25 years.

So why does marvel only get 10?

Originally posted by Starscream M
jake, I asked for one strength feat of thor in the past 10 years and I've gotten nothing, so don't give me bull that people have been posting feats for me

I just want ONE thor strength feat in the past TEN years...I really dont think thats unreasonable.

people have actually posted them in other threads.

Originally posted by Martian_mind
So, Pr, hows that sig you promised me about two years back coming along?

the one I pm'd you about and never got a response about?

Originally posted by -Pr-
Your posts say different.

Why ten years? Why not twenty? Or twenty-five?

because ten is long enough, and still current

also, why not 10?

thor isn't some obscure characters with few showings...asking for one feat in 10 years shouldn't be a problem really

Originally posted by -Pr-

the one I pm'd you about and never got a response about?

I remember this not.

Apologies sir. Also, you moved to Canada, yes?

Originally posted by Starscream M
because ten is long enough, and still current

also, why not 10?

thor isn't some obscure characters with few showings...asking for one feat in 10 years shouldn't be a problem really

because you were shown good feats in other threads, stuck your fingers in your ears and pretended they didn't exist.

because dc gets access to 25, is why.

Originally posted by Martian_mind
I remember this not.

Apologies sir. Also, you moved to Canada, yes?

I'm here right now, yeah. Trying to get my stay sorted.

It was a sig from one of those less read comics. something with a sword iirc.

Originally posted by -Pr-

I'm here right now, yeah. Trying to get my stay sorted.

It was a sig from one of those less read comics. something with a sword iirc.

I have no idea man, and I couldn't get rid of this one now, it's basically become like a fourth leg.

But anyway, thinking of moving out that way. How is it?