Originally posted by Patient_Leech
I insulted nothing other than the logic you presented.Nice try playing victim.
I'm not playing victim, I just noted you can't have this debate without throwing insults (i.e. being emotional) which shows my argument triggered you, so you thought you better add in the insults to prop up your own rebuttal.
Like I said, IF your argument was superior, it'd stand out for itself. You certainly wouldn't need to get emotional on your first rebuttal LMAO
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Islam *is* barbaric.
You see IF you and the likes of Sam Harris argued that Evolution is Fact and therefore Religion can only hold back human progression, then you'd have a much better standing. However, you decide to throw out tropes like these instead, making you just seem bigoted.
Y'all should stick to your lane.
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
😂So you're drawing an analogy on what *may* happen in the future?
And supposing it *does* happen, that's still an evolution of technology that didn't happen over night.
One step lead to another step and another step, etc..
It's not a spontaneous creation. 😂
No because that would be an advancement through ever increasing knowledge leading to superior design.
It wouldn't start happening through random chance.
Important discoveries can be made through random chance, but to act on them and progress with that discovery takes intelligence.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
I'm not playing victim, I just noted you can't have this debate without throwing insults (i.e. being emotional) which shows my argument triggered you, so you thought you better add in the insults to prop up your own rebuttal.Like I said, IF your argument was superior, it'd stand out for itself. You certainly wouldn't need to get emotional on your first rebuttal LMAO
Lol, there you go with the unsupported assertion again.
Please point out the ad hominem.
Where did I insult you personally instead of the ideas presented?
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Lol, there you go with the unsupported assertion again.Please point out the ad hominem.
Where did I insult you personally instead of the ideas presented?
Did I claim you insulted me personally ?
Nope. Try to understand my point before responding.
Let me try again:
LET YOUR ARGUMENT OWN MINE
I mean If YOU KNOW you're right, then why be insecure about it, feeling the need on Your Very First Rebuttal to throw in a paragraph insulting "the argument".
Originally posted by Blakemore
Yes, you can create life. 😂By that I mean bacteria, not conscience which you probably call life.
Interesting. I found the article (Whirlys was asking for subscription) :
Just look at the effort, expertise, complications and sophistication that went into that.
And thats for a very simple organism.
Originally posted by Darth ThorYes. Your stretch of the imagination is the idea that another being way more intelligent than those people created all life from the beginning.
Interesting. I found the article (Whirlys was asking for subscription) :Just look at the effort, expertise, complications and sophistication that went into that.
And thats for a very simple organism.
The leap of faith, from my perspective, goes as follows.
If another being has to be that intelligent to create life, then what created that being, and then that being, etc. ?
You can call it god all you want, but you're not answering any questions, just raising more.
Originally posted by Blakemore
Yes. Your stretch of the imagination is the idea that another being way more intelligent than those people created all life from the beginning.The leap of faith, from my perspective, goes as follows.
If another being has to be that intelligent to create life, then what created that being, and then that being, etc. ?
You can call it god all you want, but you're not answering any questions, just raising more.
Well its the first time you asked that question.
That Being is the source of the Universe. Exists outside time and space, in fact created Time and Space, so was never in need of being created.
So it in fact does explain a lot.