Better movie franchise: Matrix or Star Wars

Started by Galan0075 pages

The original Matrix was great (+1). Reloaded was boring and extremely mediocre-- there were only a few moments even worth talking about (-1). Revolutions was utter shit (-1). Total score= -1

The original SW Trilogy was brilliant (+3). Episode I was absolutely horrendous (-1). Episode II was shitty until the last hour or so (-1). Episode III was decent overall (+1). Total score= +2.

The SW franchise has the better good/crap ratio. It wins. Numbers don't lie.

...but this math implies that The Matrix trilogy = The Starwars prequels.

Lumping the original star wars films in with the prequels isnt fair. Lucas had full creative control over the prequels whereas in Episodes IV-VI many people had influence over it. It would be fair to say that the originals are better as a whole than the matrix trilogy, whereas the prequels were far more dissapointing.

i like how people treat the Original Trilogy like a sacred goat and ignore it's many, many flaws and completely shitty moments.

take off the Solo cup colored glasses.

the OT wasn't brilliant, not by any stretch of the imagination.

Star Wars is at the top of the mythic mountain of pop culture. The only company it has up there on the peak is the LOTR series and Harry Potter(and they both come from book series), plus Indiana Jones. The Matrix series perhaps makes my top ten series, at best. But like many fans, I thought the series started swerving off the rails from the second film. They didn't even get out of one trilogy critically unscathed.

Originally posted by marwash22
i like how people treat the Original Trilogy like a sacred goat and ignore it's many, many flaws and completely shitty moments.

take off the Solo cup colored glasses.

the OT wasn't brilliant, not by any stretch of the imagination.

Whether or not i agree with you i can only imagin what you think of the prequels. And that is more of the point i was making. And flaws are one thing. You have to look at the overall good story telling and how the characters played off of each other. The point here to look at is that even by popularity and the fact that the original series didnt write itself into a corner and ruin what was a very good original premise, it is a better franchise. ot counting the prequels which bog it down considerably.

i wasn't specifically replying to you.

Galan is the one who called the OT brilliant.

Star Wars is better and anyone who thinks The Matrix is better or that The Matrix has something decent to offer besides the first film is a buttmunchingbraindeadlabmonkey who's full of AIDS and fail. /fact

I never actually said Matrix was the better franchise, I'm simply pointing out that a lot of nerds like to pretend Star Wars is this masterpiece that has no flaws and can stand up unfazed if put under the same microscope as other movies and franchises.

Dancing phucking Ewoks. lulz. that's one the dumbest things i have seen on screen and i have watched all the Twilight movies.

Originally posted by marwash22
I never actually said Matrix was the better franchise, I'm simply pointing out that a lot of nerds like to pretend Star Wars is this masterpiece that has no flaws and can stand up unfazed if put under the same microscope as other movies and franchises.

Dancing phucking Ewoks. lulz. that's one the dumbest things i have seen on screen and i have watched all the Twilight movies.


True fans of star wars realize that the third movie was just them going through the motions. Even seth mcfarlane made it clear they didnt want to do the third movie. Tho he did make a pretty penny i bet.

Originally posted by marwash22
Galan is the one who called the OT brilliant.
Imo, from a storytelling standpoint (ie. characters, plot, delivery, setting, etc.) the OT is one of the best sagas in cinematic history.

Did it have its flaws? Sure, I never said otherwise... But so did the Matrix trilogy.

Return of the Jedi was a heaping pile of shit, the worst Star Wars movie.

For all of Jarjar's metrosexuality, Ewoks were worse.

Lol. Nah.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Return of the Jedi was a heaping pile of shit, the worst Star Wars movie.

For all of Jarjar's metrosexuality, Ewoks were worse.


Ever play Hunter mode on Starwarsbattlefront 2? Snipers vs ewoks...they f-ing ewoks always win even when i play splitscreen with another player...damned creatures

Originally posted by NemeBro
Return of the Jedi was a heaping pile of shit, the worst Star Wars movie.

For all of Jarjar's metrosexuality, Ewoks were worse.

Wut?

Originally posted by NemeBro
Return of the Jedi was a heaping pile of shit, the worst Star Wars movie.

For all of Jarjar's metrosexuality, Ewoks were worse.


I wouldnt say heaping pile of shit as even with the weoks and the circular story telling it still had alot of memorable character moments. Jar Jar wasnt even the worst part of that shit. It was lucas' fault he ****ed up.

Lucas quote(might be ver batum)
"Oh my gosh so many sets have been built, i'm gonna have to start writing a script soon."

Comparing them as films? Star Wars EASILY takes this.

lol. Jedi is better than any of the prequels, and even the Ewoks had more emotional depth than Anakin.

Plus, Luke Vs Vader Vs Emperor.

Also, Star Wars gets my vote in general. More quality in general.

I gotta go with Matrix by a flarkin mile.

The mofo that invented bullet-time.